Recommended Posts
There appears to be numerous sources to back the Rights assertion that Acorn and the Left committed Voter Fraud after the Voter Registration Fraud.
As to the Lefts assertion that the Right did the same, I think it is true as well.
Right and Left Lie, Right and Left Cheat and Right and Left bring each other to trial when one holds the majority over the other.
Thanks to Andy who has a better understanding of the law than I and stated it much clearer.
Matt
So, start being safe, first!!!
keep up...
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
muff528 3
Quotei've already provided a source - which you've ignored.
keep up...
These guys? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian
First paragraph:
"The Guardian (formerly known as The Manchester Guardian) is a British national daily newspaper owned by the Guardian Media Group. Founded in 1821, it is unique among major British daily newspapers in being owned by a foundation (the Scott Trust, via the Guardian Media Group). It is known for its left-of-centre political stance.[3] At the 2010 election it supported the Liberal Democrats."
Not saying their bias is relevant but what is their source that no illegal votes were cast?
they've relied on the facts
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
chutem 0
Unless someone has verified every single ballot no one can factually state that there were no fraudulant votes cast. You can however state that no fraudulently cast ballots were discovered in this investigation. Seems a bit of a difference there eh?
James
or, none were discovered because none were cast
(tell us when you get any evidence otherwise)
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
Your "source" is an Oct 2008 article, hardly a "source" in regards to this thread.
If you had posted a counter article that had some thing to counter the court convictions that Faux news used, then maybe it would be valid.
By your lack of willingness to address this with current and factual counters I am lead to believe that the Fraud did happen and the Convictions are just.
Of course it makes it easy to believe when Defendant's plead out for a reduced sentence and helped the Prosecution.
Matt
So, start being safe, first!!!
chutem 0
James
Quoteor, none were discovered because none were cast
(tell us when you get any evidence otherwise)
So basically although there was election fraud, it had no verifiable impact on the outcome of the election.
~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~
both of you come back when you find some actual votes cast
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
QuoteQuoteor, none were discovered because none were cast
(tell us when you get any evidence otherwise)
So basically although there was election fraud, it had no verifiable impact on the outcome of the election.
this seems to be the case

(and surely fox with its vast news resources would have found just a couple of votes by now)
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
It is a 2007 NY Times Article. I figured since out of date sources seemed to be proof it is viable.
It shows Voter Fraud Convictions.
Matt
So, start being safe, first!!!
QuoteQuoteQuoteor, none were discovered because none were cast
(tell us when you get any evidence otherwise)
So basically although there was election fraud, it had no verifiable impact on the outcome of the election.
this seems to be the case
(and surely fox with its vast news resources would have found just a couple of votes by now)
So...if the logic is no harm no foul, then no one should be concerned if someone buries a bowie knife in their backpack as long as the flight arrives on time?
~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~
can you now pick out the bit where it says fraudulent votes were cast
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteor, none were discovered because none were cast
(tell us when you get any evidence otherwise)
So basically although there was election fraud, it had no verifiable impact on the outcome of the election.
this seems to be the case
(and surely fox with its vast news resources would have found just a couple of votes by now)
So...if the logic is no harm no foul, then no one should be concerned if someone buries a bowie knife in their backpack as long as the flight arrives on time?
perhaps some tinfoil might help?
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
http://dailycaller.com/2010/11/23/the-voter-fraud-hall-of-shame-milwaukee-voter-fraud-conviction-makes-acorn%E2%80%99s-2010-total-at-least-15/
This is current and it shows Mr Clancy is convicted of Voter Fraud.
My whole issue has been your contention that NO votes where cast fraudulently. I suggest the Court Convictions and various Articles conclude other wise and no one party is innocent.
Matt
So, start being safe, first!!!
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteor, none were discovered because none were cast
(tell us when you get any evidence otherwise)
So basically although there was election fraud, it had no verifiable impact on the outcome of the election.
this seems to be the case
(and surely fox with its vast news resources would have found just a couple of votes by now)
So...if the logic is no harm no foul, then no one should be concerned if someone buries a bowie knife in their backpack as long as the flight arrives on time?
perhaps some tinfoil might help?
yeah I gotta gum wrapper if you need to make a hat!

~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~
rhaig 0
please don't feed the troll
Rob
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites