jclalor 12 #1 December 17, 2010 I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dj123 0 #2 December 17, 2010 QuoteBernacke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wmw999 2,460 #3 December 17, 2010 Oooh! Ooooh! I'll guess Mark Zuckerberg Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #4 December 17, 2010 Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #5 December 17, 2010 AFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #6 December 17, 2010 Quote Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. Also wrote "who's" for the same reason! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites dj123 0 #7 December 17, 2010 QuoteAFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Assange hasn't had a "significant"influence on the years events. Ahmed Ackmaujenidad or however you'ld like to spell it(president of Iran) has had a much larger influence on world events this year. That's my opinion. Why do you think he has? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites tonyhays 86 #8 December 17, 2010 We have a winner!!!!! “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #9 December 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteAFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Assange hasn't had a "significant"influence on the years events. Ahmed Ackmaujenidad or however you'ld like to spell it(president of Iran) has had a much larger influence on world events this year. That's my opinion. Why do you think he has? I'd put both of them in the top 10. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #10 December 17, 2010 Quote Oooh! Ooooh! I'll guess Mark Zuckerberg Wendy P. Oh shush.... this should be fun to watch since they no longer have a Man of the Year. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites dj123 0 #11 December 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteAFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Assange hasn't had a "significant"influence on the years events. Ahmed Ackmaujenidad or however you'ld like to spell it(president of Iran) has had a much larger influence on world events this year. That's my opinion. Why do you think he has? I'd put both of them in the top 10. I just don't see that Assuange has had much influence at all. Certainly not in the top ten. It seems to me that Wiki leaks hasn't revealed much of any import. Most likely that site is just a propaganda machine whose credibility with the common man is in the first stages of being established so that dis-information may be later disseminated. Again , that's my opinion. I am curious as to why you believe that Julian Assuage has had such influence as to even rank him in the top ten this year . Blue Skies, DJ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wmw999 2,460 #12 December 17, 2010 Assange's influence isn't because of the specific information that was shared via wikileaks. It was more about demonstrating the power of a fairly anonymous and interconnected internet to embarrass superpowers. Kind of like how Daniel Ellsberg isn't as much remembered for what was in the Pentagon Papers, but that he publicized them in the first place. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skyrider 0 #13 December 17, 2010 Quote Quote Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. Also wrote "who's" for the same reason! No mention of the mis spelling of Predictions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites dj123 0 #14 December 17, 2010 QuoteAssange's influence isn't because of the specific information that was shared via wikileaks. It was more about demonstrating the power of a fairly anonymous and interconnected internet to embarrass superpowers. Kind of like how Daniel Ellsberg isn't as much remembered for what was in the Pentagon Papers, but that he publicized them in the first place. Wendy P. I wonder , Wendy, if Assange was actually a threat to US security ,why hasen't he been secretly arrested and thrown into one of the secret prisons the CIA operates around the globe. If they wanted to assasinate his charachter why did they accuse him of heterosexual sex instead of homo or pedophilia? I believe Assange/wiki is a propaganda tool. Nothing of great import has been leaked. His credibility as a leaker is being established . Soon wiki can be used to disseminate *misinformation*. Unlimited Ceilings, DJ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #15 December 17, 2010 Justin Beiber? Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Remster 30 #16 December 17, 2010 Quote Oooh! Ooooh! I'll guess Mark Zuckerberg Wendy P. Guess it's so up there in news importance that most people missed it! lolRemster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #17 December 17, 2010 Quote Quote Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. Also wrote "who's" for the same reason! reminds me of Lucky's flailing on his Onion embarrassment. I don't see the advantage in reminding everyone that you can't use your/you're correctly. It's funnier to do this deliberately to make fun of those who have been caught. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
wmw999 2,460 #3 December 17, 2010 Oooh! Ooooh! I'll guess Mark Zuckerberg Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #4 December 17, 2010 Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #5 December 17, 2010 AFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #6 December 17, 2010 Quote Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. Also wrote "who's" for the same reason! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dj123 0 #7 December 17, 2010 QuoteAFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Assange hasn't had a "significant"influence on the years events. Ahmed Ackmaujenidad or however you'ld like to spell it(president of Iran) has had a much larger influence on world events this year. That's my opinion. Why do you think he has? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyhays 86 #8 December 17, 2010 We have a winner!!!!! “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #9 December 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteAFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Assange hasn't had a "significant"influence on the years events. Ahmed Ackmaujenidad or however you'ld like to spell it(president of Iran) has had a much larger influence on world events this year. That's my opinion. Why do you think he has? I'd put both of them in the top 10. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #10 December 17, 2010 Quote Oooh! Ooooh! I'll guess Mark Zuckerberg Wendy P. Oh shush.... this should be fun to watch since they no longer have a Man of the Year. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dj123 0 #11 December 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteAFAIK, Time's criterion is someone who's had a very significant influence - good, bad or neutral - on the year's events. So I'd say Julian Assange would be a top nominee. Assange hasn't had a "significant"influence on the years events. Ahmed Ackmaujenidad or however you'ld like to spell it(president of Iran) has had a much larger influence on world events this year. That's my opinion. Why do you think he has? I'd put both of them in the top 10. I just don't see that Assuange has had much influence at all. Certainly not in the top ten. It seems to me that Wiki leaks hasn't revealed much of any import. Most likely that site is just a propaganda machine whose credibility with the common man is in the first stages of being established so that dis-information may be later disseminated. Again , that's my opinion. I am curious as to why you believe that Julian Assuage has had such influence as to even rank him in the top ten this year . Blue Skies, DJ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,460 #12 December 17, 2010 Assange's influence isn't because of the specific information that was shared via wikileaks. It was more about demonstrating the power of a fairly anonymous and interconnected internet to embarrass superpowers. Kind of like how Daniel Ellsberg isn't as much remembered for what was in the Pentagon Papers, but that he publicized them in the first place. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #13 December 17, 2010 Quote Quote Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. Also wrote "who's" for the same reason! No mention of the mis spelling of Predictions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dj123 0 #14 December 17, 2010 QuoteAssange's influence isn't because of the specific information that was shared via wikileaks. It was more about demonstrating the power of a fairly anonymous and interconnected internet to embarrass superpowers. Kind of like how Daniel Ellsberg isn't as much remembered for what was in the Pentagon Papers, but that he publicized them in the first place. Wendy P. I wonder , Wendy, if Assange was actually a threat to US security ,why hasen't he been secretly arrested and thrown into one of the secret prisons the CIA operates around the globe. If they wanted to assasinate his charachter why did they accuse him of heterosexual sex instead of homo or pedophilia? I believe Assange/wiki is a propaganda tool. Nothing of great import has been leaked. His credibility as a leaker is being established . Soon wiki can be used to disseminate *misinformation*. Unlimited Ceilings, DJ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #15 December 17, 2010 Justin Beiber? Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #16 December 17, 2010 Quote Oooh! Ooooh! I'll guess Mark Zuckerberg Wendy P. Guess it's so up there in news importance that most people missed it! lolRemster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #17 December 17, 2010 Quote Quote Quote I'm gonna go with Glen Beck, who's head will then simultaneously explode. you wrote "You're" on purpose just for the fun of it. Also wrote "who's" for the same reason! reminds me of Lucky's flailing on his Onion embarrassment. I don't see the advantage in reminding everyone that you can't use your/you're correctly. It's funnier to do this deliberately to make fun of those who have been caught. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
