0
airdvr

I'm beginning to re-think my views on taxation.

Recommended Posts

You're simply ignoring the facts in an irrational manner.
You might want to retain a tax law attorney for any unforeseen future needs.
Although paying the tax will be significantly cheaper.
This has been repeatedly proven.
Ignoring that won't make it different.
:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

a whale aint a herring



A tarpon isn't a herring, either. Nice try.

Quote

not that THEY OR THEIR kids would actually serve the country like the Shrub.. or Potatoe Quayle.



Got those stats on all the lib kids volunteering for A-stan yet? No? Didn't think so.



Ever seen a Tarpon Mike... its just a big fuckling herring... and dam near inedible... paint it RED.. and its silly like your arguements.

I think you will find that there is far less support for the GOP in the services now that the GOP butt fucked so many of them over and over and over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Show us the law which requires those who earn wages to pay income tax on those wages.



TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter B > PART I > § 63
Taxable income defined
(a) In general
Except as provided in subsection (b), for purposes of this subtitle, the term “taxable income” means gross income minus the deductions allowed by this chapter (other than the standard deduction).

Listen "Big Boy" , do you even know what all tlhat means?
I'll bet you don't.

Now you'll scurry so you can cover your tracks.

No need .

I am you and you are me and we are all together. See how we run ,together,

Fair Winds and Unlimited Ceilings ,
for you and yours,

"Treetop" a.k.a. LORD OF THE SKY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You have shown the specific paragraph(s) over and over again. If you don't believe that these are actual legislated laws, I have posted a link that shows some of the 2010 and future tax laws that are being legislated directly from the Thomas Library:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/d?d111,d111:500:./temp/~bdkluE:[[o]]&items=100&|/home/LegislativeData.php?n=BSS;c=111|

I leave it up to you to search for the tax year 2009 passed bills that will point you in the direction of your questions.

You can go ahead and try to argue your case, but you are wrong. This is because you relied on information from other people and popular websites than doing the research on your own. This is your bust.

For someone who doesn't trust legitimacy on certain laws, you sure blindly follow what other people say.
_____________________________

"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Listen "Big Boy" , do you even know what all tlhat means?
I'll bet you don't.



I do. What is being said here in a nutshell is, your income, which is taxable by law, isn't imposed until allowable deductions have been correctly applied. Subsection (b) are for those who take the standard deduction vs. Itemized. Which is why you should file to reduce your tax liability. If you still don't understand, take a look at the 1040 form. It has been constructed according to the tax law and puts the aforementioned statement into simple application.
_____________________________

"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ever seen a Tarpon Mike...



Yup, sure have.

Quote

its just a big fuckling herring



Herring, genus Clupea.

Tarpon, genus Megalops.

Herring != Tarpon

Quote

paint it RED.. and its silly like your arguements.



Yeah, whatever you say. Remind me again about PNAC and that martial law thing, will you?

Quote

I think you will find that there is far less support for the GOP in the services now that the GOP butt fucked so many of them over and over and over.



In point of fact, the officer corps is predominantly conservative (63% conservative, 23% moderate, 14% liberal), and the enlisted more moderate (45% moderate, 32% conservative, 23% liberal).

Regarding political party, the officer ranks are again predominantly conservative (51% republican, 37% independent, 12% democrat) while the enlisted are more independent (66% independent, 23% republican, 11% democrat).
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Show us the law which requires those who earn wages to pay income tax on those wages.



TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter B > PART I > § 63
Taxable income defined
(a) In general
Except as provided in subsection (b), for purposes of this subtitle, the term “taxable income” means gross income minus the deductions allowed by this chapter (other than the standard deduction).



Listen "Big Boy" , do you even know what all tlhat means?
I'll bet you don't.



Yes, 'Little Man", I do, but evidently you don't.

"The United States Code is the codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. "

You've been given the appropriate sections of the US Code - the words of the LAW. Your inability or unwillingness to realize that is YOUR problem - not ours.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still just looks like a big ass herring Mike.. I know how you love all your red herrings.

As I said... the times they are a changin.... just like they did while we were engaged in the SE Asian War Games. a LOT of those in the service saw things as they really are instead of the glorified patriotic movie images they grew up on. It changed many of us DRASTICALY.

I wonder how many of those "Conservative" officers that Rummy boned.. are still staunch GOP supporters and are now following in the disgruntled footsteps of Colin Powell after the GOP did such a great job for his comrades in arms[:/]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Still just looks like a big ass herring Mike.. I know how you love all your red herrings.



I *do* love them - I see so many in your arguments that I can point out.

Quote

I wonder how many of those "Conservative" officers that Rummy boned.. are still staunch GOP supporters and are now following in the disgruntled footsteps of Colin Powell after the GOP did such a great job for his comrades in arms[:/]



86% Conservative or Moderate vs. 14% Liberal - don't hold your breath, m'kay? You might strain something.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Still just looks like a big ass herring Mike.. I know how you love all your red herrings.



I *do* love them - I see so many in your arguments that I can point out.

Quote

I wonder how many of those "Conservative" officers that Rummy boned.. are still staunch GOP supporters and are now following in the disgruntled footsteps of Colin Powell after the GOP did such a great job for his comrades in arms[:/]



86% Conservative or Moderate vs. 14% Liberal - don't hold your breath, m'kay? You might strain something.


Uh huh

Peer pressure is a wonderful thing

Ever wonder what the TRUE numbers are when their careers are not on the line for spouting the party line???

There seem to be a lot of new politicians who served who do NOT seem to fit your demographics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Still just looks like a big ass herring Mike.. I know how you love all your red herrings.



I *do* love them - I see so many in your arguments that I can point out.

Quote

I wonder how many of those "Conservative" officers that Rummy boned.. are still staunch GOP supporters and are now following in the disgruntled footsteps of Colin Powell after the GOP did such a great job for his comrades in arms[:/]



86% Conservative or Moderate vs. 14% Liberal - don't hold your breath, m'kay? You might strain something.


Uh huh

Peer pressure is a wonderful thing

Ever wonder what the TRUE numbers are when their careers are not on the line for spouting the party line???


Oh, of course... just like the thousands of soldiers that got court-martialled last week for participating in the DADT survey. :S

Quote

There seem to be a lot of new politicians who served who do NOT seem to fit your demographics



Like LTC Scott Brown, R-MA?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


You *do* love that broad brush, don't you?

Seeing as how I haven't set foot in a church in over 30 years, your view of my 'demographic' is, as usual, dead wrong.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


You *do* love that broad brush, don't you?

Seeing as how I haven't set foot in a church in over 30 years, your view of my 'demographic' is, as usual, dead wrong.


Funny how you always seem to be an apologist for the status quo on so many far right leaning issues that actually are Laying down flat on their right side.... nope.. not a lot of leaning for Mikee.:ph34r::ph34r:

There is no religious discrimination in the military..... there is no peer pressure to be "conservative"... these are not the issues you are looking for... move along..:ph34r::ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


You *do* love that broad brush, don't you?

Seeing as how I haven't set foot in a church in over 30 years, your view of my 'demographic' is, as usual, dead wrong.


Funny how you always seem to be an apologist for the status quo on so many far right leaning issues that actually are Laying down flat on their right side.... nope.. not a lot of leaning for Mikee.:ph34r::ph34r:


Here's the threads on the AF Academy issue:

Thread 1

Thread 2

Put up or shut up time, Jeanne - show my posts supporting the actions or admit you're lying. It's one or the other.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:SIts just an observation Mikee.... your unquestioning support for so many of those fringe right issues.. and the former administration for any fucked up crap they came up with RAH RAH RAH goes the cheerleaders of the fringe right.

And is the whole accusing people of lying thing.. is this the lastest fringe right buzz word that you and Marc got from your indoctrinators???:S

Musta got tired of trying to paint anyone not in goose step with yall as libs:ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:

The military is one of the greatest organizations around.. but the expectation of conformance is paramount... and that leads to many peer group pressures to conform... OR ELSE.

Deny that all you wish... but I think I am not the only one who has seen it in action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

And is the whole accusing people of lying thing.. is this the lastest fringe right buzz word that you and Marc got from your indoctrinators???:S



You claim my demographics are the same as the folks at the AFA - I've provided the links to the threads - prove your assertion.

It's either true and I've posted in the threads supporting the actions of the AFA, or you're lying when you made the claim - pretty black and white, and I already know the answer.

Quote

Musta got tired of trying to paint anyone not in goose step with yall as libs:ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:



No, I'm tired of your constant insinuations where you "paint anyone not in goose step with you" as either a religious extremist, racist, fascist, homosexual, or sexual deviant (or combinations of the preceding).
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

And is the whole accusing people of lying thing.. is this the lastest fringe right buzz word that you and Marc got from your indoctrinators???:S



You claim my demographics are the same as the folks at the AFA - I've provided the links to the threads - prove your assertion.

It's either true and I've posted in the threads supporting the actions of the AFA, or you're lying when you made the claim - pretty black and white, and I already know the answer.

Quote

Musta got tired of trying to paint anyone not in goose step with yall as libs:ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:



No, I'm tired of your constant insinuations where you "paint anyone not in goose step with you" as either a religious extremist, racist, fascist, homosexual, or sexual deviant (or combinations of the preceding).



Birds of a feather... seem to have flocked together in the GOP.. and ALL of those things are FAR too common among the fringe rightrePUBIClowns that have co-opted the party for the last 20 years.

Sorry that discourages you... but you are a big boy.. you should be able to handle the truth.. no matter how much you wish it was not a sad sad truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

And is the whole accusing people of lying thing.. is this the lastest fringe right buzz word that you and Marc got from your indoctrinators???:S



You claim my demographics are the same as the folks at the AFA - I've provided the links to the threads - prove your assertion.

It's either true and I've posted in the threads supporting the actions of the AFA, or you're lying when you made the claim - pretty black and white, and I already know the answer.

Quote

Musta got tired of trying to paint anyone not in goose step with yall as libs:ph34r::ph34r::ph34r:



No, I'm tired of your constant insinuations where you "paint anyone not in goose step with you" as either a religious extremist, racist, fascist, homosexual, or sexual deviant (or combinations of the preceding).


Birds of a feather... seem to have flocked together in the GOP.. and ALL of those things are FAR too common among the fringe rightrePUBIClowns that have co-opted the party for the last 20 years.


And you constantly insinuate that those of us here that don't follow the same drum that you do are just like them - just like you did to me upthread.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Hey when the ducks all quack the same....:ph34r:



Thanks for proving the point.


Sorry that you guys keep voting for those who spout morality and try to legislate morality and turn out time after time after time.. to have a far higher level of immorality in their own lives.

IT must REALLLY suck to be fooled damn near ALL of the time.




Sucks to be yall:ph34r::ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Two years ago Wall Street's colossal greed crashed our economy. Our financial elites created and spewed highly leveraged toxic assets around the globe. These poisonous "innovations" pumped up the housing bubble and Wall Street grew insanely rich in the process. When it all burst, we learned that the big Wall Street institutions that had caused the crash were far too big to fail -- and too connected. High government officials came to their rescue with trillions in cash and guarantees -- underwritten, of course, by we taxpayers. Everyone knew this at the time. But if you asked just about anyone on "The Street" they denied all culpability and pointed the finger everywhere else: Fannie, Freddie, the Fed, the Community Reinvestment Act, tax deductions for home buying, bad regulations, not enough regulations, too many regulations, too much consumer debt, the rating agencies, the Chinese -- and on and on. Sadly, their blame-shifting strategy worked, bamboozling the media and people across the political spectrum. The GOP members of the Financial Crisis Commission are so drunk with this Kool-Aid that in their minority report, they refuse even to use the words "Wall Street" or "speculation" in assessing the causes of the crash. Hypocrites? Crooks? Morons? Take your pick.



http://www.alternet.org/economy/149361/wall_st%27s_10_biggest_lies_of_2010/
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You're simply ignoring the facts in an irrational manner.
You might want to retain a tax law attorney for any unforeseen future needs.
Although paying the tax will be significantly cheaper.
This has been repeatedly proven.
Ignoring that won't make it different.
:P



Define income. As a matter of fact and law, why don't you look up and provide for us the definition of income as stated in the tax code.
Thanks.

"Treetop" aka LORD OF THE SKY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0