funjumper101 15 #1 January 5, 2011 If Pelosi spewed tears every time she was on camera, the RWCs would have had a shit fit over her emotional lack of control and forced her out of office. How come Boner, the new SOTH, gets a pass? That weepy piece of shit can't even do a sixty minutes interview without busting out the tears. He was crying today. How come his obvious emotional instability is of no concern to the RWCs? The worthless POS is third in line to be POTUS. Anyone with half a clue should be horrified that an emotional wreck like Boner is that close to being POTUS. Give me an effective hard-ass like Pelosi anytime. Not an alcoholic emotional train wreck. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2 January 5, 2011 Quote If Pelosi spewed tears every time she was on camera, the RWCs would have had a shit fit over her emotional lack of control and forced her out of office. How come Boner, the new SOTH, gets a pass? That weepy piece of shit can't even do a sixty minutes interview without busting out the tears. He was crying today. How come his obvious emotional instability is of no concern to the RWCs? The worthless POS is third in line to be POTUS. Anyone with half a clue should be horrified that an emotional wreck like Boner is that close to being POTUS. Give me an effective hard-ass like Pelosi anytime. Not an alcoholic emotional train wreck. And so it beginsLoosing it early than I thought you wouldthanks for this I needed it"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #3 January 6, 2011 Your Bias is showing. I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
david3 0 #4 January 6, 2011 Quote Your Bias is showing. Ya think? Although it is a little odd. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #5 January 6, 2011 Quote Quote If Pelosi spewed tears every time she was on camera, the RWCs would have had a shit fit over her emotional lack of control and forced her out of office. How come Boner, the new SOTH, gets a pass? That weepy piece of shit can't even do a sixty minutes interview without busting out the tears. He was crying today. How come his obvious emotional instability is of no concern to the RWCs? The worthless POS is third in line to be POTUS. Anyone with half a clue should be horrified that an emotional wreck like Boner is that close to being POTUS. Give me an effective hard-ass like Pelosi anytime. Not an alcoholic emotional train wreck. And so it beginsLoosing it early than I thought you wouldthanks for this I needed it A weepy emotional wreck becomes SOTH, and you are HAPPY? That is disgusting, even for you. Thanks for cheering on the ruination of the USA. I hope that you live long enough to come to realize just how wrong you and your kind are. NOTHING positive has ever come from conservative philosophy. Nothing. Not a speck of goodness or societal advancement. If it was up to RWCs, slavery would still be legal, women's suffrage would not have occurred, and racial discrimination would be completely legal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #6 January 6, 2011 Quote Quote Your Bias is showing. Ya think? Although it is a little odd. The guy fought long and hard for what he acheived. Would you berate an athlete at the olympics when he wins the gold and sheds a few tears? He I look at it like he has a serious passion that most of his collegues don't have. He isn't afraid to show it and in his own words, "I'm comfortable in my own skin." I think it would be a little overboard if he cries at every occasion, but so far that is not the case. I am glad that the dems finally have someone to belittle again though. They must be so happy.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #7 January 6, 2011 QuoteNOTHING positive has ever come from conservative philosophy. Nothing. Not a speck of goodness or societal advancement. If it was up to RWCs, slavery would still be legal, women's suffrage would not have occurred, and racial discrimination would be completely legal. Yo have the most rediculous ideas. They really are disgusting.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
david3 0 #8 January 6, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Your Bias is showing. Ya think? Although it is a little odd. The guy fought long and hard for what he acheived. Would you berate an athlete at the olympics when he wins the gold and sheds a few tears? He I look at it like he has a serious passion that most of his collegues don't have. He isn't afraid to show it and in his own words, "I'm comfortable in my own skin." I think it would be a little overboard if he cries at every occasion, but so far that is not the case. I am glad that the dems finally have someone to belittle again though. They must be so happy. I know about how hard he has worked. I still find it a little odd. Now your bias is showing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,009 #9 January 6, 2011 >I think it would be a little overboard if he cries at every occasion =========== A Title Change, but the Tears Will Stay Published: January 4, 2011 WASHINGTON — It is a habit that Representative John A. Boehner is making no effort to kick. Mr. Boehner cries at big moments, and based on his history, is likely to tear up at some point on Wednesday, when he is scheduled to be sworn in as speaker of the House. His wife, Debbie Boehner, said Tuesday that the nation should get used to it. ============ That being said, I don't think that crying alone means much in the grand scheme of things, provided he is effective in his job, and can keep his crying (and perhaps more importantly his drinking) under control. Let's hope your newfound respect for (seeming) displays of weakness is not confined to republicans. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #10 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuoteIf Pelosi spewed tears every time she was on camera, the RWCs would have had a shit fit over her emotional lack of control and forced her out of office. Limbaugh sure let Pelosi Have it. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/17/rush_on_pelosi_getting_emotional_tears_of_a_clown.html What a fucking dick. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #11 January 6, 2011 Quote The guy fought long and hard for what he acheived. Would you berate an athlete at the olympics when he wins the gold and sheds a few tears? He How long and hard did *he* fight to get the party a majority? I barely heard his name prior to November. Did he really win it, or did Pelosi and Obama lose it, just as Bush lost it in 2008? Besides all that, he already had been SOTH before, so it's not like it was the culmination of a life dream. Rather, it's a comeback. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 221 #12 January 6, 2011 Quote Quote Quote If Pelosi spewed tears every time she was on camera, the RWCs would have had a shit fit over her emotional lack of control and forced her out of office. Limbaugh sure let Pelosi Have it. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/17/rush_on_pelosi_getting_emotional_tears_of_a_clown.html What a fucking dick. I agree with you . . . today is just to wierd. Yes RL is a giant Prick - So is O'Reilly So is GB But they do have a valid point every now and again - Not as often as would seem prudent, but sometimes they hit the ball down the fairway.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 221 #13 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuote The guy fought long and hard for what he acheived. Would you berate an athlete at the olympics when he wins the gold and sheds a few tears? He How long and hard did *he* fight to get the party a majority? I barely heard his name prior to November. Did he really win it, or did Pelosi and Obama lose it, just as Bush lost it in 2008? Besides all that, he already had been SOTH before, so it's not like it was the culmination of a life dream. Rather, it's a comeback. Why are you so against it?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #14 January 6, 2011 Quote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 221 #15 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. You sure it isn't sour grapes because the SOTH isn't Pelosi any more?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites petejones45 0 #16 January 6, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Your Bias is showing. Ya think? Although it is a little odd. The guy bribed long and hard for what he acheived. fixed it for you Look out for the freefly team, Smelly Peppers. Once we get a couple years more experience we will be a force to be reckoned with in the near future! BLUES! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #17 January 6, 2011 Quote >I think it would be a little overboard if he cries at every occasion =========== A Title Change, but the Tears Will Stay Published: January 4, 2011 WASHINGTON — It is a habit that Representative John A. Boehner is making no effort to kick. Mr. Boehner cries at big moments, and based on his history, is likely to tear up at some point on Wednesday, when he is scheduled to be sworn in as speaker of the House. His wife, Debbie Boehner, said Tuesday that the nation should get used to it. ============ That being said, I don't think that crying alone means much in the grand scheme of things, provided he is effective in his job, and can keep his crying (and perhaps more importantly his drinking) under control. Let's hope your newfound respect for (seeming) displays of weakness is not confined to republicans. Uh huh ... AS IF Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites winsor 236 #18 January 6, 2011 Pelosi is an evil piece of shit. I will take someone given to tears over the malevolent harpy he replaced any day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #19 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. You sure it isn't sour grapes because the SOTH isn't Pelosi any more? I don't think she even deserves the minority title anymore. The 3rd ranking person of the world's superpower should project strength, not tears. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #20 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. You sure it isn't sour grapes because the SOTH isn't Pelosi any more? I don't think she even deserves the minority title anymore. The 3rd ranking person of the world's superpower should project strength, not tears. I wish the libs would make up their minds - all the whining about how unfeeling the Reps are, then they bitch about too much emotion. As for strength...let's get the first ranker showing some before we worry about #3, eh?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skycop 0 #21 January 6, 2011 Look at the SOTH background, then look at many of the most outspoken democrats backgrounds. Then tell me who is more in touch with the "common man" Pelosi was an ice princess who thought she was queen. I'll take the speakers tears, the man has been a success coming from very humble beginnings. If he screws up like previous speakers have, then he'll be gone too. We'll see "Just 'cause I'm simple, don't mean I'm stewpid!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #22 January 6, 2011 Quote I wish the libs would make up their minds - all the whining about how unfeeling the Reps are, then they bitch about too much emotion. As for strength...let's get the first ranker showing some before we worry about #3, eh? Doesn't that make it more imperative that the 3rd guy not be a crybaby? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jgoose71 0 #23 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuote I wish the libs would make up their minds - all the whining about how unfeeling the Reps are, then they bitch about too much emotion. As for strength...let's get the first ranker showing some before we worry about #3, eh? Doesn't that make it more imperative that the 3rd guy not be a crybaby? Only if you are worried that guys #1 and #2 are going to fall off the scene. When was the last time both the Pres and VP both disappeared? You know something your not sharing?"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wmw999 2,461 #24 January 6, 2011 Were she a man who was like that, he wouldn't be called evil, just hard-assed and shrill. That said, I wish she hadn't been the majority leader, and I wish she weren't the minority leader. She's an ineffective tool because of her attitude. As far as Boehner crying? WTF does it matter, unless it impacts his effectiveness, and it doesn't look like it does. But, in the "legislative drama" department, the House, just to prove that it's in Republican hands now, is going to pass a bill that has NO chance whatsoever of passing the Senate. No fucking purpose to that other than theater -- why not begin hammering out legislation that actually has a chance of passing and impacting the debt? Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites david3 0 #25 January 6, 2011 Quote But, in the "legislative drama" department, the House, just to prove that it's in Republican hands now, is going to pass a bill that has NO chance whatsoever of passing the Senate. No fucking purpose to that other than theater -- why not begin hammering out legislation that actually has a chance of passing and impacting the debt? Wendy P. So they can call the Dems the party of “NO”. Tit for tat. Like you said “theater”. It comes from both sides. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
kelpdiver 2 #11 January 6, 2011 Quote The guy fought long and hard for what he acheived. Would you berate an athlete at the olympics when he wins the gold and sheds a few tears? He How long and hard did *he* fight to get the party a majority? I barely heard his name prior to November. Did he really win it, or did Pelosi and Obama lose it, just as Bush lost it in 2008? Besides all that, he already had been SOTH before, so it's not like it was the culmination of a life dream. Rather, it's a comeback. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #12 January 6, 2011 Quote Quote Quote If Pelosi spewed tears every time she was on camera, the RWCs would have had a shit fit over her emotional lack of control and forced her out of office. Limbaugh sure let Pelosi Have it. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/09/17/rush_on_pelosi_getting_emotional_tears_of_a_clown.html What a fucking dick. I agree with you . . . today is just to wierd. Yes RL is a giant Prick - So is O'Reilly So is GB But they do have a valid point every now and again - Not as often as would seem prudent, but sometimes they hit the ball down the fairway.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #13 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuote The guy fought long and hard for what he acheived. Would you berate an athlete at the olympics when he wins the gold and sheds a few tears? He How long and hard did *he* fight to get the party a majority? I barely heard his name prior to November. Did he really win it, or did Pelosi and Obama lose it, just as Bush lost it in 2008? Besides all that, he already had been SOTH before, so it's not like it was the culmination of a life dream. Rather, it's a comeback. Why are you so against it?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #14 January 6, 2011 Quote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #15 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. You sure it isn't sour grapes because the SOTH isn't Pelosi any more?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
petejones45 0 #16 January 6, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Your Bias is showing. Ya think? Although it is a little odd. The guy bribed long and hard for what he acheived. fixed it for you Look out for the freefly team, Smelly Peppers. Once we get a couple years more experience we will be a force to be reckoned with in the near future! BLUES! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #17 January 6, 2011 Quote >I think it would be a little overboard if he cries at every occasion =========== A Title Change, but the Tears Will Stay Published: January 4, 2011 WASHINGTON — It is a habit that Representative John A. Boehner is making no effort to kick. Mr. Boehner cries at big moments, and based on his history, is likely to tear up at some point on Wednesday, when he is scheduled to be sworn in as speaker of the House. His wife, Debbie Boehner, said Tuesday that the nation should get used to it. ============ That being said, I don't think that crying alone means much in the grand scheme of things, provided he is effective in his job, and can keep his crying (and perhaps more importantly his drinking) under control. Let's hope your newfound respect for (seeming) displays of weakness is not confined to republicans. Uh huh ... AS IF Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #18 January 6, 2011 Pelosi is an evil piece of shit. I will take someone given to tears over the malevolent harpy he replaced any day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #19 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. You sure it isn't sour grapes because the SOTH isn't Pelosi any more? I don't think she even deserves the minority title anymore. The 3rd ranking person of the world's superpower should project strength, not tears. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #20 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Why are you so against it? Against what? I reject your explanation. But yes, I don't think the Speaker of the House should be weepy. You sure it isn't sour grapes because the SOTH isn't Pelosi any more? I don't think she even deserves the minority title anymore. The 3rd ranking person of the world's superpower should project strength, not tears. I wish the libs would make up their minds - all the whining about how unfeeling the Reps are, then they bitch about too much emotion. As for strength...let's get the first ranker showing some before we worry about #3, eh?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skycop 0 #21 January 6, 2011 Look at the SOTH background, then look at many of the most outspoken democrats backgrounds. Then tell me who is more in touch with the "common man" Pelosi was an ice princess who thought she was queen. I'll take the speakers tears, the man has been a success coming from very humble beginnings. If he screws up like previous speakers have, then he'll be gone too. We'll see "Just 'cause I'm simple, don't mean I'm stewpid!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #22 January 6, 2011 Quote I wish the libs would make up their minds - all the whining about how unfeeling the Reps are, then they bitch about too much emotion. As for strength...let's get the first ranker showing some before we worry about #3, eh? Doesn't that make it more imperative that the 3rd guy not be a crybaby? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #23 January 6, 2011 QuoteQuote I wish the libs would make up their minds - all the whining about how unfeeling the Reps are, then they bitch about too much emotion. As for strength...let's get the first ranker showing some before we worry about #3, eh? Doesn't that make it more imperative that the 3rd guy not be a crybaby? Only if you are worried that guys #1 and #2 are going to fall off the scene. When was the last time both the Pres and VP both disappeared? You know something your not sharing?"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,461 #24 January 6, 2011 Were she a man who was like that, he wouldn't be called evil, just hard-assed and shrill. That said, I wish she hadn't been the majority leader, and I wish she weren't the minority leader. She's an ineffective tool because of her attitude. As far as Boehner crying? WTF does it matter, unless it impacts his effectiveness, and it doesn't look like it does. But, in the "legislative drama" department, the House, just to prove that it's in Republican hands now, is going to pass a bill that has NO chance whatsoever of passing the Senate. No fucking purpose to that other than theater -- why not begin hammering out legislation that actually has a chance of passing and impacting the debt? Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
david3 0 #25 January 6, 2011 Quote But, in the "legislative drama" department, the House, just to prove that it's in Republican hands now, is going to pass a bill that has NO chance whatsoever of passing the Senate. No fucking purpose to that other than theater -- why not begin hammering out legislation that actually has a chance of passing and impacting the debt? Wendy P. So they can call the Dems the party of “NO”. Tit for tat. Like you said “theater”. It comes from both sides. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
