kallend 2,108 #76 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteApparently you can't even remember your own question, which was: "So are you OK with a major tax increase to your income bracket or are you only wanting it increased to only those that make more than you?" If you can't figure out my answer, just try thinking a bit harder. Deflect, and Shuck and Jive! Just answer the question so that everone can understand your attempts to be illusive. Not my fault if you are incapable of understanding.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #77 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteApparently you can't even remember your own question, which was: "So are you OK with a major tax increase to your income bracket or are you only wanting it increased to only those that make more than you?" If you can't figure out my answer, just try thinking a bit harder. Deflect, and Shuck and Jive! Just answer the question so that everone can understand your attempts to be illusive. Not my fault if you are incapable of understanding. Supposedly if the student doesn't learn, it is the teachers fault, right? Just answer the question. Yes or No. Surely you can do that - or you can deflect and try to avoid answering again and again witch everyone here is used to - it really doesn't matter, it would just be nice for you to have the balls to actually answer some.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #78 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteApparently you can't even remember your own question, which was: "So are you OK with a major tax increase to your income bracket or are you only wanting it increased to only those that make more than you?" If you can't figure out my answer, just try thinking a bit harder. Deflect, and Shuck and Jive! Just answer the question so that everone can understand your attempts to be illusive. Not my fault if you are incapable of understanding. Supposedly if the student doesn't learn, it is the teachers fault, right? Just answer the question. Yes or No. Surely you can do that - or you can deflect and try to avoid answering again and again witch everyone here is used to - it really doesn't matter, it would just be nice for you to have the balls to actually answer some. In my experience as an instructor in several fields over a period of 40 years, some students are too damn stupid and closed minded to learn anything that goes against their brainwashing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #79 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteApparently you can't even remember your own question, which was: "So are you OK with a major tax increase to your income bracket or are you only wanting it increased to only those that make more than you?" If you can't figure out my answer, just try thinking a bit harder. Deflect, and Shuck and Jive! Just answer the question so that everone can understand your attempts to be illusive. Not my fault if you are incapable of understanding. Supposedly if the student doesn't learn, it is the teachers fault, right? Just answer the question. Yes or No. Surely you can do that - or you can deflect and try to avoid answering again and again witch everyone here is used to - it really doesn't matter, it would just be nice for you to have the balls to actually answer some. Not my fault if you are incapable of understanding or remembering. I've made the same statement about taxes dozens of times.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #80 February 22, 2011 QuoteIn my experience as an instructor in several fields over a period of 40 years, some students are too damn stupid and closed minded to learn anything that goes against their brainwashing. Guess that's why you still cling to that whole 'private army' thing, then.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #81 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteIn my experience as an instructor in several fields over a period of 40 years, some students are too damn stupid and closed minded to learn anything that goes against their brainwashing. Guess that's why you still cling to that whole 'private army' thing, then. Whatsa matter Mikeee.. Couldn't make the first cut??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #82 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteApparently you can't even remember your own question, which was: "So are you OK with a major tax increase to your income bracket or are you only wanting it increased to only those that make more than you?" If you can't figure out my answer, just try thinking a bit harder. Deflect, and Shuck and Jive! Just answer the question so that everone can understand your attempts to be illusive. Not my fault if you are incapable of understanding. Supposedly if the student doesn't learn, it is the teachers fault, right? Just answer the question. Yes or No. Surely you can do that - or you can deflect and try to avoid answering again and again witch everyone here is used to - it really doesn't matter, it would just be nice for you to have the balls to actually answer some. Not my fault if you are incapable of understanding or remembering. I've made the same statement about taxes dozens of times. I don't stalk your posts - if it happens to be in a thread I am reading - then I might read your stuff. I guess what i am trying to say, is that because of your posting history and your avoidance history. I don't believe you have. You avoid answering almost every question and are a vague as you can possibly be taking no actual position on most topics. So - no - I don't believe you have actually taken a stance on this.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #83 February 22, 2011 If you were really interested in my position on taxes and not just trying to score cheap points, you WOULD have paid attention previously. You are totally unconvincing as a debater. We ALL need to pay our way. Especially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #84 February 22, 2011 QuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #85 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Uh Mikeee.... just the bonus of just ONE of the guys you hoping for a trickle from is probably equal to well over 10000 of those low income people you want to tax while giving Mr Trickle a complete pass. Caint squeeze blood from a turnip Mikeee Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #86 February 22, 2011 QuoteIf you were really interested in my position on taxes and not just trying to score cheap points, you WOULD have paid attention previously. You are totally unconvincing as a debater. We ALL need to pay our way. Especially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. And now we are down to the meat and potatos of it. What percentage are you willing to pay for that to be your fair share. I never really supported the Bush tax cuts, by the way, and I will freely admit that anyone making more than me needs to pay more. The question is: What is a "Fair Share"? I think anyone making over 85K/yr should pay upwards of 50% of their income. Slide that scale down gradually to the poverty level which would obviously pay nothing. Is that a fair share? I think so.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #87 February 22, 2011 Hey! I'll put in 15% of my taxable income! Hell, I'll put in another 15% to cover the prof! While I'm at it I'll throw in another 15% for Amazon You Mike BillVon BUTTers and even the klueless kollege kid.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ridestrong 1 #88 February 22, 2011 Quote Quote Apparently you can't even remember your own question, which was: "So are you OK with a major tax increase to your income bracket or are you only wanting it increased to only those that make more than you?" If you can't figure out my answer, just try thinking a bit harder. Deflect, and Shuck and Jive! Just answer the question so that everone can understand your attempts to be illusive. It's like trying to fix a broken record only you can't move the needle... Because of the main 3-4 Lib posters here I can hardly tolerate reading SC posts any more. They actually make me almost miss Lucky's posts.... AT LEAST he did post a few lines of actual substance a mist his paragraphs of BS.*I am not afraid of dying... I am afraid of missing life.* ----Disclaimer: I don't know shit about skydiving.---- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mirage62 0 #89 February 22, 2011 Quote In my experience as an instructor in several fields over a period of 40 years, some students are too damn stupid and closed minded to learn anything that goes against their brainwashing. Amazon, if this is proper to ask...are you a teacher?Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #90 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Billionaires saved more than the poor make in total.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #91 February 22, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Apparently you can't even remember your own question, which was: "So are you OK with a major tax increase to your income bracket or are you only wanting it increased to only those that make more than you?" If you can't figure out my answer, just try thinking a bit harder. Deflect, and Shuck and Jive! Just answer the question so that everone can understand your attempts to be illusive. It's like trying to fix a broken record only you can't move the needle... Because of the main 3-4 Lib posters here I can hardly tolerate reading SC posts any more. They actually make me almost miss Lucky's posts.... AT LEAST he did post a few lines of actual substance a mist his paragraphs of BS. What part of "roll back the Bush era tax cuts" is it that you fail to comprehend? I can't say I've seen any substance from you on this issue.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #92 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuote In my experience as an instructor in several fields over a period of 40 years, some students are too damn stupid and closed minded to learn anything that goes against their brainwashing. Nope it pays for shit and is a complete waste of an education. Teachers deserve a much better living wage ... Trey need to get merit pay for those who do an exceptional job... and those who do not perform... get rid of them and sack the damn administrators who do little to educate. To live in an educated society there need to be two components, educators who strive for excellence and parents need to be involved to make very sure that the next generation is not a member of the Dumb as Dirt and Proud of IT mentality that is taking over in a larger Idiocracy. That type of mentality will not give us a secure society that is able to compete in a 21st century world. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #93 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #94 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? It sure a hell isn't going to be an answer about what he thinks a fair share to be.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,108 #95 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? It sure a hell isn't going to be an answer about what he thinks a fair share to be. WHY SHOULD I, WHEN I'VE DONE IT ALREADY. Particularly www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3772317;search_string=fair%20tax;#3772317 and http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4026201;search_string=fair%20tax;#4026201 You really have an atrocious attention span and attention to detail... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,108 #96 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? You do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #97 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? It sure a hell isn't going to be an answer about what he thinks a fair share to be. WHY SHOULD I, WHEN I'VE DONE IT ALREADY. Particularly www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3772317;search_string=fair%20tax;#3772317 You really have an atrocious attention span and attention to detail Only if you are arrogant enough and self-important enough to believe that everyone should remember your posts. by this example - it looks like the same old shuck and jive. You seem to refuse to let yourself have a stance on what specific percentage is YOUR personal belief, or you don't have the balls to claim one. QuoteTax protocols and rates are set to give the maximum revenue with fewest complaints from supporting voters. "Fair" has nothing to do with it. See - you just can't seem to admit that you have an opinion, unless you think that the current tax system is ok and there should be no increases.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #98 February 22, 2011 QuoteYou do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't. You do understand the concept of economy of scale, don't you? No, you obviously don't.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites turtlespeed 226 #99 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteYou do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't. You do understand the concept of economy of scale, don't you? No, you obviously don't. Kinda strange how obtuse that line of thinking is. One would think a university professor could do better.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,108 #100 February 23, 2011 QuoteQuoteYou do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't. You do understand the concept of economy of scale, don't you? No, you obviously don't. How does that have anything to do with whether or not the very wealthy got more from Bush's tax breaks than the poor make altogether? Answer - it has nothing to do with it whatsoever, you are just trying to distract from the facts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page 4 of 6 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
mnealtx 0 #93 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #94 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? It sure a hell isn't going to be an answer about what he thinks a fair share to be.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #95 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? It sure a hell isn't going to be an answer about what he thinks a fair share to be. WHY SHOULD I, WHEN I'VE DONE IT ALREADY. Particularly www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3772317;search_string=fair%20tax;#3772317 and http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4026201;search_string=fair%20tax;#4026201 You really have an atrocious attention span and attention to detail... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #96 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? You do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #97 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteEspecially those who benefited most from Bush's absurdly unwise tax cuts. That would be the low income folks removed from the tax rolls entirely due to the cuts. Not very good at math are you? Better than you, evidently - someome paying zero tax is better off than someone paying $1 in tax, by definition. QuoteBillionaires saved more than the poor make in total. They paid more than the poor people in total, too - coming to a point sometime soon? It sure a hell isn't going to be an answer about what he thinks a fair share to be. WHY SHOULD I, WHEN I'VE DONE IT ALREADY. Particularly www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3772317;search_string=fair%20tax;#3772317 You really have an atrocious attention span and attention to detail Only if you are arrogant enough and self-important enough to believe that everyone should remember your posts. by this example - it looks like the same old shuck and jive. You seem to refuse to let yourself have a stance on what specific percentage is YOUR personal belief, or you don't have the balls to claim one. QuoteTax protocols and rates are set to give the maximum revenue with fewest complaints from supporting voters. "Fair" has nothing to do with it. See - you just can't seem to admit that you have an opinion, unless you think that the current tax system is ok and there should be no increases.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #98 February 22, 2011 QuoteYou do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't. You do understand the concept of economy of scale, don't you? No, you obviously don't.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #99 February 22, 2011 QuoteQuoteYou do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't. You do understand the concept of economy of scale, don't you? No, you obviously don't. Kinda strange how obtuse that line of thinking is. One would think a university professor could do better.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #100 February 23, 2011 QuoteQuoteYou do understand the concept of subtraction to find a difference, don't you? Well maybe you don't. You do understand the concept of economy of scale, don't you? No, you obviously don't. How does that have anything to do with whether or not the very wealthy got more from Bush's tax breaks than the poor make altogether? Answer - it has nothing to do with it whatsoever, you are just trying to distract from the facts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
