Recommended Posts
jaybird18c 24
jaybird18c 24
QuoteQuoteGod is fair and just and will judge each person on the merits of what opportunities they were given.
that's not what the other guys have been telling us here.
"Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you repentance? But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, who will render to each person according to his deeds." Romans 2:4-5
maadmax 0
Quote
I respect your faith, but I respectfully disagree. These issues are a distraction from the real message the Bible is offering. Salvation to a lost world.
jaybird18c 24
QuoteQuote
I respect your faith, but I respectfully disagree. These issues are a distraction from the real message the Bible is offering. Salvation to a lost world.
I agree that we can agree to disagree on this but it does undermine the doctrine of salvation which begins in Genesis. You can choose not to believe what it says, but it is clear. A Gap theory or any other is just an attempt to compromise and harmonize what is told with modern evolutionary ideas.
jakee 1,489
QuoteQuoteYeah, but again, it's not exactly a surprise that the bible is going to try and convince you of it's own reliability. Problem is that anyone can just make up a story to illustrate that the bonkers advice they're peddling is going to work. I could tell you that the last person who gave me $100 married a supermodel a month later. Does that actually mean that it would be a good idea for you to give me money?
You do realize that most of those guys died horribly rather than deny what they had seen and experienced? Now, Muslims fly into buildings for what they deeply believe but that is different. It would be very difficult indeed to find someone willing to suffer and die the kind of deaths the Apostles did for what they knew to be false (just to further another false religion). Also kind of a different scenario than the one you mentioned.
First of all you do realise, with all of your scriptural know how, that you quoted the old testament, right? Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the apostles witnessed those events.
Secondly, I don't think it is particularly impressive that the apostles were willing to die. It's not unique, or even that special, that a charismatic individual can craft so devoted a group of followers and it absolutely is not evidence enough to convince me that miracles are the more likely option.
jakee 1,489
QuoteQuoteQuote
I respect your faith, but I respectfully disagree. These issues are a distraction from the real message the Bible is offering. Salvation to a lost world.
I agree that we can agree to disagree on this but it does undermine the doctrine of salvation which begins in Genesis. You can choose not to believe what it says, but it is clear. A Gap theory or any other is just an attempt to compromise and harmonize what is told with modern evolutionary ideas.
Yet again I point out the disconnect between your earlier trumpeting of exegesis and your stance on this issue, which is something along the lines of "It needs to be true so fuck what the evidence says."
RonD1120 62
QuoteQuoteQuoteGod is fair and just and will judge each person on the merits of what opportunities they were given.
that's not what the other guys have been telling us here.
"Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you repentance? But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, who will render to each person according to his deeds." Romans 2:4-5
We have a saying in substance recovery, "God is not fair and life is not fair, be grateful."
RonD1120 62
Quote
I agree that we can agree to disagree on this but it does undermine the doctrine of salvation which begins in Genesis. You can choose not to believe what it says, but it is clear. A Gap theory or any other is just an attempt to compromise and harmonize what is told with modern evolutionary ideas.
Yet again I point out the disconnect between your earlier trumpeting of exegesis and your stance on this issue, which is something along the lines of "It needs to be true so fuck what the evidence says."
I heard an interesting point made on History yesterday. That is, the Bible is not a book of science so don't try to make it as such. However, religion and science do overlap. They overlap in the soul of the person who has science and who has religion.
The message of the Bible is salvation.
winsor 236
QuoteQuoteQuote
I respect your faith, but I respectfully disagree. These issues are a distraction from the real message the Bible is offering. Salvation to a lost world.
I agree that we can agree to disagree on this but it does undermine the doctrine of salvation which begins in Genesis. You can choose not to believe what it says, but it is clear. A Gap theory or any other is just an attempt to compromise and harmonize what is told with modern evolutionary ideas.
Given that this thread is conclusive evidence that religious conviction is but a socially acceptable form of psychosis, the clear demonstration that its underlying principles are unadulterated nonsense is pointless.
If someone is going to devote their life to Baal or Gichimanitou or Bacchus or whatever, the fact that these are all mythical constructs is moot. The myriad gods out there are equally real and have identical claims to legitimacy (depending on who you ask).
When believers presume to make their case by "logic," it has a similar quality to a little kid who is trying to prove that there are monsters in his closet - in a much more pathetic manner. The garbled accounts found in the popular religious texts are no more convincing than if belivers were to cite the phone book for support of their position.
If I am working in a high-risk environment, knowing that the person upon whom I must rely is an adherent of a delusional phobosophy is frighteneing. I question the mental competence of someone who really believes in leprechauns and so forth, and thinks that failing to properly follow critical safety procedures will simply give them hot and cold running virgins or harp music ad nauseum or whatever. I'll take a cynic any day.
Faith is okay, in that I have faith that I can make the best of what comes along if I so choose. Belief in things that are patently, demonstrably false is not so good. I contend that the only limitless resource at our disposal is stupidity, and religion is proof positive of that principle. One whose work is appreciated most by those in the upper echelons of Mensa is likely to remain obscure, but one who can tap into that atavistic facet of the human condition represented by religion is set for life.
Getting back to the basis of the thread, it was simply the work of someone who assembled a period chrestomathy that did not not rely on superstition. It was an exercise of duplicating the work of those who prepared the popular religious compendia with an eye toward knowledge, rather than ignorance.
Unfortunately, as the advertising rule of thumb goes, once you reach an 8th grade level, you have lost half your audience. Or, as Taylor Caldwell put it, "5% of the population think, 5% think they think, and 90% would rather die than think," and religion is ample proof that she was spot on.
BSBD,
Winsor
jakee 1,489
QuoteQuote
I agree that we can agree to disagree on this but it does undermine the doctrine of salvation which begins in Genesis. You can choose not to believe what it says, but it is clear. A Gap theory or any other is just an attempt to compromise and harmonize what is told with modern evolutionary ideas.
Yet again I point out the disconnect between your earlier trumpeting of exegesis and your stance on this issue, which is something along the lines of "It needs to be true so fuck what the evidence says."
I heard an interesting point made on History yesterday. That is, the Bible is not a book of science so don't try to make it as such. However, religion and science do overlap. They overlap in the soul of the person who has science and who has religion.
A) What does that actually mean?
B) What are you telling me for? I'm not the one who thinks that Genesis has to be literally true.
that's not what the other guys have been telling us here.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites