rehmwa 2
QuoteThe most amusing aspect of SC is people post with the sincere belief that it makes a difference.
that's funny, I don't know anyone here with that belief
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
QuoteQuoteDo the men who become prisoners of war accept the process?
Does a man being questioned at a police station accept the process, even if it includes being roughed up? Does that make it OK?
Context isn't everything, Marc, but power, and the ability to say NO and have it matter, means a lot.
SEALs can say NO. Boxers can say NO. Women in consensual relationships can say NO.
Beating victims, rape victims, and prisoners of war cannot say NO. And saying that torture (which waterboarding was defined as before) is part of establishing dominance is bullshit. The subjects are prisoners of war. They're not in charge of anything.
Wendy P.
Explain the no thing to the family and friends of the people in the towers.
I dont like it either
There are a good many things neither of us Like
That does not change what the reality is
"Explain it to the people in the towers" - why do you presume to speak for them or their remaining families?
And isn't that argument just the same as saying that because someone else did something bad, that makes it okay for us to something bad in return?
QuoteAnd if taking a terrorist and skinning the bastard alive (of course keep it a damn secret!-loose lips sink ships!) kept them from carrying out an attack on US schools like in Beslan Russia- think I'd really give a fuck?
Do you consider yourself a moral person?
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteSome people voluntarily choose to have their genitalia pierced.
Using rushmc "logic" that means sticking needles into the genitals of POWs is not torture.
Some people voluntarily choose to have their noses, navels and cheeks pierced.
Using rushmc "logic" that means sticking needles into the bodies of POWs is not torture.
Some people, those into S&M, voluntarily choose to be whipped.
Using rushmc "logic" that means whipping and beating POWs is acceptable.
Some people choose to have anal sex.
Using rushmc "logic" that means sodomizing POWs is acceptable and is not torture.
There's something seriously wrong with rushmc "logic".
thanks for the professionalisms dick!
You are welcome. Not able to deny any of it, are you?
Why would anyone reply to bull shit?
It just validates it
What do you think Dick?
rush - when you reply like this, it makes it obvious that you have been hurt.
rushmc 23
And isn't that argument just the same as saying that because someone else did something bad, that makes it okay for us to something bad in return?
I do not
Nope
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteSome people voluntarily choose to have their genitalia pierced.
Using rushmc "logic" that means sticking needles into the genitals of POWs is not torture.
Some people voluntarily choose to have their noses, navels and cheeks pierced.
Using rushmc "logic" that means sticking needles into the bodies of POWs is not torture.
Some people, those into S&M, voluntarily choose to be whipped.
Using rushmc "logic" that means whipping and beating POWs is acceptable.
Some people choose to have anal sex.
Using rushmc "logic" that means sodomizing POWs is acceptable and is not torture.
There's something seriously wrong with rushmc "logic".
thanks for the professionalisms dick!
You are welcome. Not able to deny any of it, are you?
Why would anyone reply to bull shit?
It just validates it
What do you think Dick?
rush - when you reply like this, it makes it obvious that you have been hurt.
That then makes me assume you think, I give a damn about what others or you think of and about me
Or
... maybe you missed a couple of posts that explains the comments.
Which is it?
Hmmmm
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Quote>The most amusing aspect of SC is people post with the sincere belief that
>it makes a difference.
It doesn't. (Which is a good thing to keep in mind when trying to convert others to one's religion.)
QuoteDisintegration of the entire vehicle began after an O-ring seal in its right solid rocket booster (SRB) failed at liftoff. The O-ring failure caused a breach in the SRB joint it sealed, allowing pressurized hot gas from within the solid rocket motor to reach the outside and impinge upon the adjacent SRB attachment hardware and external fuel tank. This led to the separation of the right-hand SRB's aft attachment and the structural failure of the external tank. Aerodynamic forces promptly broke up the orbiter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
winsor 236
QuoteQuote>The most amusing aspect of SC is people post with the sincere belief that
>it makes a difference.
It doesn't. (Which is a good thing to keep in mind when trying to convert others to one's religion.)QuoteDisintegration of the entire vehicle began after an O-ring seal in its right solid rocket booster (SRB) failed at liftoff. The O-ring failure caused a breach in the SRB joint it sealed, allowing pressurized hot gas from within the solid rocket motor to reach the outside and impinge upon the adjacent SRB attachment hardware and external fuel tank. This led to the separation of the right-hand SRB's aft attachment and the structural failure of the external tank. Aerodynamic forces promptly broke up the orbiter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
Bot misfire?
QuoteQuoteQuote>The most amusing aspect of SC is people post with the sincere belief that
>it makes a difference.
It doesn't. (Which is a good thing to keep in mind when trying to convert others to one's religion.)QuoteDisintegration of the entire vehicle began after an O-ring seal in its right solid rocket booster (SRB) failed at liftoff. The O-ring failure caused a breach in the SRB joint it sealed, allowing pressurized hot gas from within the solid rocket motor to reach the outside and impinge upon the adjacent SRB attachment hardware and external fuel tank. This led to the separation of the right-hand SRB's aft attachment and the structural failure of the external tank. Aerodynamic forces promptly broke up the orbiter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
Bot misfire?
billvon will get it...
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
This is exactly what I keep in mind when you post about AGW
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln