Recommended Posts
Quote
The lawyers are very cautious about how much use they make of email or other electronic communications, preferring in person communication. Their argument--and it makes some sense--is that if we were ever involved in a lawsuit it's best not too have too much of a paper trail which can be revealed in discovery and "can and will be used against you in a court of law".
less kindly put, they're dinosaurs when it comes to technology, with word perfect lasting far longer in the legal realm than anywhere else. And the courts are even more primitive and happy to be so.
Speaking solely about lawyers--and leaving medicine and business aside for the moment--I am a technical person who happens to work with a lot of lawyers. The lawyers IMO are much better than the tech folks about ensuring that their work doesn't get outsourced.
The lawyers are very cautious about how much use they make of email or other electronic communications, preferring in person communication. Their argument--and it makes some sense--is that if we were ever involved in a lawsuit it's best not too have too much of a paper trail which can be revealed in discovery and "can and will be used against you in a court of law".
It's a valid argument but of course there is a second, unspoken, reason for their preference to avoid email: By insisting on in person interaction for a lot of their work, they ensure that it cannot be outsourced. The lawyers actually do outsource some of their work, but only very routine tasks that do not threaten their livelihood.
The engineers, OTOH, email anything and everything.
The result is that, while both engineers and lawyers can be hurt by an economic downturn, the engineers find themselves competing against a global labor force while the lawyers only need to be competitive domestically or perhaps even just within their own state.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites