0
quade

Some With Histories of Mental Illness Petition to Get Their Gun Rights Back

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

There is a cost to freedom.



If the cost is innocent lives within our own borders, then the cost is far to high if only to protect the rights of the very few.



We need to outlaw skydiving then. And driving. Both of those cost innocent lives within our own borders. Also bathtubs. You know how many people die each year from hitting their head in the bathtub?
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?

Initially evaluation by a health professional (psychiatrist, ER doctor etc) Final decision by a court supported by mental health professionals.



What instrument would you have the mental health professional use for that evaluation? What is the standard against which that person is measured?
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>What instrument would you have the mental health professional use for that
>evaluation? What is the standard against which that person is measured?

Whether or not the person is a danger to themselves or others.



This is a criteria for an emergency psychiatric admission (or continued confinement). Everybody how is ever released no longer meets that criteria. Are you in favor of restoring their rights as soon as they no longer meet that criteria?
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Are you in favor of restoring their rights as soon as they no longer meet that criteria?

I think that as soon as possible after such a loss of rights, a court (backed up by mental health experts) should make a decision to either restore their rights or revoke them more permanently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Are you in favor of restoring their rights as soon as they no longer meet that criteria?

I think that as soon as possible after such a loss of rights, a court (backed up by mental health experts) should make a decision to either restore their rights or revoke them more permanently.



Great, what would the legal standard that the court would be evaluating against? Since we have already determined that the person is no longer a danger ot himself or others. Would further testing be required by mental health professionals? What tests? Who would bear the costs of these evaluations?
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So I am not sure why you jumped my ass a few posts ago



I wasn't jumping on you. I was posing a question concerning how you (or anyone) may feel if a victim were a loved one.

i am sure that you do realize that I am a gun owner. I have own a variety of guns over the years from an AR-15 to an Uzi. Though, I will admit that there is no real reason to have an Uzi, other than they are fun to fire (extremely expensive to do so.)
I use to be against near any legislation concerning gun control (even after being shot myself.) That is until 1995. One incidence being my spiral into depression. The other being my mother being pistol whipped during a hold up at the Sally's Beauty Supply that she worked at. I finally realized that certain people should not have guns. Some should never have access. I really have no idea how to limit complete access without denying every person their constitutional right. It is unreasonable to think that access can be completely denied, even with safeguards in place. Yet, if safeguards are ignored completely, then we should be prepared for whatever happens and for what will follow.
I would hate to see further legislation against us who do follow the law due to actions of those who should had never been in possession in the first place.

Marc, I believe we are on the same track, only moving at different speeds.
"...And once you're gone, you can't come back
When you're out of the blue and into the black."
Neil Young

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?

Initially evaluation by a health professional (psychiatrist, ER doctor etc) Final decision by a court supported by mental health professionals.



I am all for that

What would trigger this?
And then what would the first step be

And how would the actions (to the first step) be monitored to make sure the process is not abused?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marc, I believe we are on the same track, only moving at different speeds.



Agreed
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Please explain how you would "close the cracks".



Using the assessment of psychiatric professionals to determine status instead of physics professors watching Youtube would be a start.



So you agree with me now. (Using psychiatric professional was suggested by me some years ago).
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



It's a fascinating thing, John. I'd like you to answer this - how many people who are not ACTUAL threats should be seized in order to ensure that there is full coverage. Me? I'm the guy who has said I'd rather see 100 criminals go free than 1 innocent person imprisoned. The same holds true for kooks



How about you give the strawman a break. No-one has suggested seizing or imprisoning anyone on account of their mental illness.



How many innocent people would you like to be shot dead so that a "kook" can buy a gun with no inconvenience?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?

Initially evaluation by a health professional (psychiatrist, ER doctor etc) Final decision by a court supported by mental health professionals.



This I agree with.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



It's a fascinating thing, John. I'd like you to answer this - how many people who are not ACTUAL threats should be seized in order to ensure that there is full coverage. Me? I'm the guy who has said I'd rather see 100 criminals go free than 1 innocent person imprisoned. The same holds true for kooks



How about you give the strawman a break. No-one has suggested seizing or imprisoning anyone on account of their mental illness.



How many innocent people would you like to be shot dead so that a "kook" can buy a gun with no inconvenience?



Yet again another example of someone wanting complete security even though a right may be sacrificed. And that security would not be realized anyway.

Sorry John, I dont buy it.

You bitched differently about the Patriot Act I recall
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

There is a cost to freedom.



If the cost is innocent lives within our own borders, then the cost is far to high if only to protect the rights of the very few.


We need to outlaw skydiving then. And driving. Both of those cost innocent lives within our own borders. Also bathtubs. You know how many people die each year from hitting their head in the bathtub?


Congrats on your successful completion of the Mike Neal school of debate.

However, your rant makes you sound unstable - now where did I put that NICS contact number....?

No offense, Southern, I just could not resist.B|
"...And once you're gone, you can't come back
When you're out of the blue and into the black."
Neil Young

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?



I think most people don't want to arm the mentally unstable.



Agreed

So your point is?



You appear to have asked a question to which an answer isn't required since it makes little sense.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?

Initially evaluation by a health professional (psychiatrist, ER doctor etc) Final decision by a court supported by mental health professionals.



What instrument would you have the mental health professional use for that evaluation? What is the standard against which that person is measured?



Start here to understand just one over several tests.
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/436/the-psychopath-test

Testing high in psychopathy is one of several positive indicators. Not the only one, but the program discusses how it does relate to criminal behavior.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?



I think most people don't want to arm the mentally unstable.


Agreed

So your point is?


You appear to have asked a question to which an answer isn't required since it makes little sense.

:D

You posted that most people dont want to arm the mentally unstable

Ok

I do not see anyone here arguing against that position

You must have had a reason or a point to get across when you posted that

What is it?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Psychopathy is not "mental illness." Psychopathy is best described as "criminal."

There was no "mental illness" in Ted Bundy. The BTK Killer? Nope. Absolutely they knew right from wrong. They just were psychopaths.

There is a great and easy confusion between "psychopaths" and "psychotics." Pshoctics are those who, like schizophrenics, lose contact with reality. Psychopaths are ALWAYS under control. They are rational. They know that what they are doing is wrong but don't care because they will do what they want.

The psychopaths are the ones to be worried about. They are not "mentally ill." They are the quintessential bad seeds. They are the ones that end up in the criminal justice system AFTER they commit crimes.

Please note the difference between a "psychotic" and a "psychopath." A "psychopath" is the antisocial. The psychopath knows right from wrong and chooses wrong because he/she likes it. The psychopath is the predator.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

>How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?

Initially evaluation by a health professional (psychiatrist, ER doctor etc) Final decision by a court supported by mental health professionals.



What instrument would you have the mental health professional use for that evaluation? What is the standard against which that person is measured?


Start here to understand just one over several tests.
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/436/the-psychopath-test

Testing high in psychopathy is one of several positive indicators. Not the only one, but the program discusses how it does relate to criminal behavior.


I wonder how many shrinks and other so called mental health professionals would flunk that test.

I have met a few who worked in the field for one reason and one reason alone....They needed their patients help to them overcome their own poverty issues.

Other than that.... the fuckers were all nuttier than loons.. and fairly quick to abuse those they were supposed to be helping:S:S:S:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Psychopathy is not "mental illness." Psychopathy is best described as "criminal."

There was no "mental illness" in Ted Bundy. The BTK Killer? Nope. Absolutely they knew right from wrong. They just were psychopaths.

There is a great and easy confusion between "psychopaths" and "psychotics." Pshoctics are those who, like schizophrenics, lose contact with reality. Psychopaths are ALWAYS under control. They are rational. They know that what they are doing is wrong but don't care because they will do what they want.

The psychopaths are the ones to be worried about. They are not "mentally ill." They are the quintessential bad seeds. They are the ones that end up in the criminal justice system AFTER they commit crimes.

Please note the difference between a "psychotic" and a "psychopath." A "psychopath" is the antisocial. The psychopath knows right from wrong and chooses wrong because he/she likes it. The psychopath is the predator.




Your short break of about 3 hrs is already over?

Intersting ideas, you have there. :| There's nothing new in it, nothing you cannot googly by yourself.

Do you vote for giving them weapons or not??

I just feel a *great and easy confusion* in every of your posts.

:S

dudeist skydiver # 3105

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep. I thank quade for correcting me and I apologize to kallend for being a dick.

And true - nothing you can't google. Which is why I'm curous about why psychotpaths (who know right from wrong) are being lumped in with those who don't know right from wrong.

Quote

Do you vote for giving them weapons or not??



I don't vote for giving anyone weapons. If they want weapons they can get them themselves.

I DO, however, vote for lettign peope exercise their rights until they fuck up. Thus, even the psychopath gets a gun until she uses it.

We all know europeans cannot be trusted with guns - they themselves admit it and their governments thankfully remove weapons from them. But, if a European is in the US, then I do not support preventing them from accessing weapons.

Quote

I just feel a *great and easy confusion* in every of your posts



You feel plenty. It'd be nice for you to "think" instead of feel.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I wonder how many shrinks and other so called mental health professionals would flunk that test.

I have met a few who worked in the field for one reason and one reason alone....They needed their patients help to them overcome their own poverty issues.

Other than that.... the fuckers were all nuttier than loons.. and fairly quick to abuse those they were supposed to be helping:S:S:S:S



Scary that these are the very people so many want to put in charge or allowing or denying people their rights, isn't it?
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



..... Which is why I'm curous about why psychotpaths (who know right from wrong) are being lumped in with those who don't know right from wrong.
....



Nonsense. Do you really care if Ted Bundy or the BTK killer are falling into same category with the other mentally disturbed ones??

You posted a giant pile of sh*t today (where you falling into your whiskey bottle??) and now you're just looking for flimsy excuses to correct something ....

:|

dudeist skydiver # 3105

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

How would you pick who is metally unstable enough to own a firearm?


I think most people don't want to arm the mentally unstable.

Agreed
So your point is?

You appear to have asked a question to which an answer isn't required since it makes little sense.

:D
You posted that most people dont want to arm the mentally unstable
Ok
I do not see anyone here arguing against that position
You must have had a reason or a point to get across when you posted that
What is it?


Take a breath to clear your mind and carefully reread the sentence you wrote and I originally quoted from you at the top of this post.

What you've asked is how we as a society should establish the minimum level of mental instability to be allowed to own a gun.

If you do not understand why I commented the way I did after this explanation, I can't help you.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0