marks2065 0 #26 July 12, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote The evidence mounts.... and Mikeeeeeee goes for his first new Medal in Defence of the Undefendable. Well let's see that vaunted evidence proving old Rupert was in it up to his elbows, then. Why.. its impossible to prove your sacred cows can EVER do anything wrong...You are incapable of ever hearing ANY discouraging word. Post 7: Quote ***If this is the case, I think he should face some heavy consequences. Given the *large* assumption that Murdoch was aware of the practice at all, I agree. So.... where's that "evidence", Jeanne? Your usuall ASSumptions... that those you worship are above and beyond any wrongdoing... because YOU believe in them I thought in this country that you are innocent until proven guilty. prove the guilt. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA What country is Rupert from.. and where is this scandal unfolding..... FAIL... but I have come to expect that from some around here. just like we know what to expect from you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #27 July 12, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote The evidence mounts.... and Mikeeeeeee goes for his first new Medal in Defence of the Undefendable. Well let's see that vaunted evidence proving old Rupert was in it up to his elbows, then. Why.. its impossible to prove your sacred cows can EVER do anything wrong...You are incapable of ever hearing ANY discouraging word. Post 7: Quote ***If this is the case, I think he should face some heavy consequences. Given the *large* assumption that Murdoch was aware of the practice at all, I agree. So.... where's that "evidence", Jeanne? Your usuall ASSumptions... that those you worship are above and beyond any wrongdoing... because YOU believe in them I thought in this country that you are innocent until proven guilty. prove the guilt. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA What country is Rupert from.. and where is this scandal unfolding..... FAIL... but I have come to expect that from some around here. just like we know what to expect from you Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #28 July 12, 2011 Quote Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... Great movie!Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #29 July 12, 2011 Quote Quote Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... Great movie! So was Goldfinger. Mnealtx seems to think it was a military documentary, though.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #30 July 13, 2011 Quote FAIL... but I have come to expect that from some around here. But enough about your posts....you mentioned evidence?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #31 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote FAIL... but I have come to expect that from some around here. But enough about your posts....you mentioned evidence? Most little boys grow out of that tactic at about 6 or 7.. tsk tsk tsk He set up the culture.... amazing how THE BOSS socializes his expectations and his amorality is adopted by those who work for him. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/10/rupert-murdoch-s-dark-arts-hacking-scandal-hasn-t-vanquished-him-yet.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #32 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... Great movie! So was Goldfinger. Mnealtx seems to think it was a military documentary, though. I believe I was about 10 or so when I actually saw the movie. My experience with the quote was from hearing military folks use it. Regardless of the source it STILL makes the case that the papers are being attacked from outside - that seems to have conveniently dropped off your radar, perfesser.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #33 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote Quote FAIL... but I have come to expect that from some around here. But enough about your posts....you mentioned evidence? Most little boys grow out of that tactic at about 6 or 7.. tsk tsk tsk Evidently little girls NEVER grow out of it, going by your example. Quote He set up the culture.... amazing how THE BOSS socializes his expectations and his amorality is adopted by those who work for him. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/10/rupert-murdoch-s-dark-arts-hacking-scandal-hasn-t-vanquished-him-yet.html An editorial piece is your 'evidence'? Par for the course, too - the accusation is all that matters, evidence be damned.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #34 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote FAIL... but I have come to expect that from some around here. But enough about your posts....you mentioned evidence? Most little boys grow out of that tactic at about 6 or 7.. tsk tsk tsk Evidently little girls NEVER grow out of it, going by your example. Quote He set up the culture.... amazing how THE BOSS socializes his expectations and his amorality is adopted by those who work for him. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/10/rupert-murdoch-s-dark-arts-hacking-scandal-hasn-t-vanquished-him-yet.html An editorial piece is your 'evidence'? Par for the course, too - the accusation is all that matters, evidence be damned. Mikee There will NEVER be enough evidence to suit you. Face it.. its am impossibility. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #35 July 13, 2011 QuoteThere will NEVER be enough evidence to suit you. Face it.. its am impossibility. "Enough" evidence implies that there was any evidence supplied in the first place. We're still waiting.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #36 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... Great movie! So was Goldfinger. Mnealtx seems to think it was a military documentary, though. I believe I was about 10 or so when I actually saw the movie. My experience with the quote was from hearing military folks use it. Regardless of the source it STILL makes the case that the papers are being attacked from outside - that seems to have conveniently dropped off your radar, perfesser. VICTIMS generally are on the outside. Left, right and center politicianss have been his victims, as well as children and crime victims. The people Rupert hired (see thread title since apparently you've forgotten it) are HIS responsibility. (At least) three of his mouthpieces "news" organizations are up to the same unethical tricks. Hardly a coincidence. Rupert is a Class 1 sleazebag and you know it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #37 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... Great movie! So was Goldfinger. Mnealtx seems to think it was a military documentary, though. I believe I was about 10 or so when I actually saw the movie. My experience with the quote was from hearing military folks use it. Regardless of the source it STILL makes the case that the papers are being attacked from outside - that seems to have conveniently dropped off your radar, perfesser. VICTIMS generally are on the outside. Left, right and center politicianss have been his victims, as well as children and crime victims. The people Rupert hired (see thread title since apparently you've forgotten it) are HIS responsibility. (At least) three of his mouthpieces "news" organizations are up to the same unethical tricks. Hardly a coincidence. Rupert is a Class 1 sleazebag and you know it. Thread titles don't equate to proof/evidence, either.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #38 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... Great movie! So was Goldfinger. Mnealtx seems to think it was a military documentary, though. I believe I was about 10 or so when I actually saw the movie. My experience with the quote was from hearing military folks use it. Regardless of the source it STILL makes the case that the papers are being attacked from outside - that seems to have conveniently dropped off your radar, perfesser. VICTIMS generally are on the outside. Left, right and center politicianss have been his victims, as well as children and crime victims. The people Rupert hired (see thread title since apparently you've forgotten it) are HIS responsibility. (At least) three of his mouthpieces "news" organizations are up to the same unethical tricks. Hardly a coincidence. Rupert is a Class 1 sleazebag and you know it. That is the kind of person that certain frionge righties WORSHIP you will never be able to break that BELIEF.. its not in their natures to ever believe anything different about their ICONS of the Fringe. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #39 July 13, 2011 poor mr murdoch stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #40 July 13, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Yup.. me laughing at the usual suspects on a daily basis... Great movie! So was Goldfinger. Mnealtx seems to think it was a military documentary, though. I believe I was about 10 or so when I actually saw the movie. My experience with the quote was from hearing military folks use it. Regardless of the source it STILL makes the case that the papers are being attacked from outside - that seems to have conveniently dropped off your radar, perfesser. VICTIMS generally are on the outside. Left, right and center politicianss have been his victims, as well as children and crime victims. The people Rupert hired (see thread title since apparently you've forgotten it) are HIS responsibility. (At least) three of his mouthpieces "news" organizations are up to the same unethical tricks. Hardly a coincidence. Rupert is a Class 1 sleazebag and you know it. Thread titles don't equate to proof/evidence, either. Are you saying he didn't hire the people who run the Sun, News of the World and Sunday Times? OR are you claiming that no unethical acts were committed?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,490 #41 July 13, 2011 QuoteOf course, the usual suspects also fail to mention that it was investigators that did the tapping and not reporters - of course, that wouldn't fit with the whole "look what Rupert did" theme, now would it? Hmm, yes, that's an interesting take on it. Just investigators, so obviously seperate and working independently. Of course, one of the guys who have so far been convicted and jailed in connection with this mess was not a reporter, but an editor. And one of the guys currently under police bail was not a reporter, but the editor. What theme does that fit?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #42 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteOf course, the usual suspects also fail to mention that it was investigators that did the tapping and not reporters - of course, that wouldn't fit with the whole "look what Rupert did" theme, now would it? Hmm, yes, that's an interesting take on it. Just investigators, so obviously seperate and working independently. Of course, one of the guys who have so far been convicted and jailed in connection with this mess was not a reporter, but an editor. And one of the guys currently under police bail was not a reporter, but the editor. What theme does that fit? That more information has come out from when I made my first post. Still waiting on that email from Rupert telling people to tap phones - you know, something that would actually support the allegations that he was involved?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frankyspanky 0 #43 July 14, 2011 LOLBack a hundred years ago, especially around Woodrow Wilson, what happened in this country is we took freedom and we chopped it into pieces. Ron Paul Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nigel99 475 #44 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteOf course, the usual suspects also fail to mention that it was investigators that did the tapping and not reporters - of course, that wouldn't fit with the whole "look what Rupert did" theme, now would it? Hmm, yes, that's an interesting take on it. Just investigators, so obviously seperate and working independently. Of course, one of the guys who have so far been convicted and jailed in connection with this mess was not a reporter, but an editor. And one of the guys currently under police bail was not a reporter, but the editor. What theme does that fit? That more information has come out from when I made my first post. Still waiting on that email from Rupert telling people to tap phones - you know, something that would actually support the allegations that he was involved? Business culture is set from the top. A number of journalists have stated that NoW had a standing policy of getting the story at any cost. Bribes, employing shady individuals require financial sign-off. One isolated incident is a rogue employee, wholesale business practice is down to management. By the way - it is becoming apparent that illegal practices are quite widespread in the whole of the UK tabloid press. I am open to the fact that it may be an industry wide problem not specific to one organisation. We also have regulators and bodies that are supposed to provide oversight, they are guilty of incompetence for not exposing this some time ago.Experienced jumper - someone who has made mistakes more often than I have and lived. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,490 #45 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteOf course, the usual suspects also fail to mention that it was investigators that did the tapping and not reporters - of course, that wouldn't fit with the whole "look what Rupert did" theme, now would it? Hmm, yes, that's an interesting take on it. Just investigators, so obviously seperate and working independently. Of course, one of the guys who have so far been convicted and jailed in connection with this mess was not a reporter, but an editor. And one of the guys currently under police bail was not a reporter, but the editor. What theme does that fit? That more information has come out from when I made my first post. No, that information was available when you made your first post. But seriously, you thought it was important to note that it was investigators, not reporters that were carrying out the hacks. Since it turns out that the criminal culture at the paper actually rises beyond mere reporters and goes right to the top, has that had any impact on your opinion? If not, why mention it in the first place?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ScottishJohn 25 #46 July 14, 2011 It's unlikely that you will see an email as the existence of NOW email archive keeps changing depending on what court case the NOW Exec are trying to defend against. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/did-wapping-executive-try-to-delete-the-evidence-2309492.html John---------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think my attitude stinks you should smell my fingers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #47 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteOf course, the usual suspects also fail to mention that it was investigators that did the tapping and not reporters - of course, that wouldn't fit with the whole "look what Rupert did" theme, now would it? Hmm, yes, that's an interesting take on it. Just investigators, so obviously seperate and working independently. Of course, one of the guys who have so far been convicted and jailed in connection with this mess was not a reporter, but an editor. And one of the guys currently under police bail was not a reporter, but the editor. What theme does that fit? That more information has come out from when I made my first post. No, that information was available when you made your first post. Believe whatever you wish. QuoteBut seriously, you thought it was important to note that it was investigators, not reporters that were carrying out the hacks. Since it turns out that the criminal culture at the paper actually rises beyond mere reporters and goes right to the top, has that had any impact on your opinion? If not, why mention it in the first place? According to Nigel, above, it's all of them, not just Rupert's bunch. As to why I mentioned it, because it was mentioned in the article I read.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #48 July 14, 2011 QuoteIt's unlikely that you will see an email as the existence of NOW email archive keeps changing depending on what court case the NOW Exec are trying to defend against. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/did-wapping-executive-try-to-delete-the-evidence-2309492.html John I'm certain they'll be dealt with much more severely than Phil Jones and CRU.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #49 July 14, 2011 QuoteQuoteIt's unlikely that you will see an email as the existence of NOW email archive keeps changing depending on what court case the NOW Exec are trying to defend against. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/did-wapping-executive-try-to-delete-the-evidence-2309492.html John I'm certain they'll be dealt with much more severely than Phil Jones and CRU. Or the Democrat operatives that were tapeing Newt Gingrich's cell phone conversations a few years ago. Not too much outrage then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #50 July 14, 2011 the outrage isn't against hacking politicians phones. the outrage is against the hacking of the phones of murder victims, the war dead, and their families...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
