mnealtx 0 #126 August 16, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteMore WEASELING from mnealtx. MORE lack of proof from kallend - maybe you can come up with some logs from your telepathy machine or something. You're funny when you defend the indefensible. STILL haven't read post 7, John?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #127 May 1, 2012 Rupert Murdoch "is not a fit person" to head a major international company. - UK Parliamentary report. Committee members stressed they were completely agreed on their finding that three of Murdoch’s senior executives essentially lied to Parliament about phone hacking, which News International insisted for years was confined to one "rogue reporter." One of those executives, Colin Myler, is now the editor of the Murdoch-owned New York Daily News.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wlsc 0 #128 May 1, 2012 ...On the basis of the facts and evidence before the Committee, we conclude that, if at all relevant times Rupert Murdoch did not take steps to become fully informed about phone-hacking, he turned a blind eye and exhibited wilful blindness to what was going on in his companies and publications. This culture, we consider, permeated from the top throughout the organisation and speaks volumes about the lack of effective corporate governance at News Corporation and News International. We conclude, therefore, that Rupert Murdoch is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #129 May 1, 2012 Quote...We conclude, therefore, that Rupert Murdoch is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company... That's a disturbing statement. If the guy is deserving of criminal or civil consequences, so be it. I'm not sure I want committees deciding who is fit to have a particular job in private industry. Ominous wording there.I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #130 May 1, 2012 QuoteQuote...We conclude, therefore, that Rupert Murdoch is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company... That's a disturbing statement. If the guy is deserving of criminal or civil consequences, so be it. I'm not sure I want committees deciding who is fit to have a particular job in private industry. Ominous wording there. "disturbing" is an understatement ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #131 May 1, 2012 Only ominous if this committee has any actual power to affect change within the company. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wlsc 0 #132 May 1, 2012 QuoteOnly ominous if this committee has any actual power to affect change within the company. It does. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wlsc 0 #133 May 1, 2012 ...Labour is using this as an opportunity to refocus attention on Ofcom's current review of whether News Corporation is "fit and proper" to hold a broadcasting licence. If found to be an unfit and improper owner, Murdoch could lose his existing 39 per cent stake in BSkyB... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #134 May 2, 2012 Quote Its so funny to watch when one of the darlings of the fringe right... and one of your lords and masters who you want to trickle on you... Sheeee's baaaaack, lol...I knew it was only a matter of time sugar momma... I guess you got board with you dz.com PM personal attack camgaign, eh? How'd that work out for ya?Muah...luv ya, girl.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #135 May 2, 2012 You *do* realize the post you replied to was from LAST YEAR, right?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #136 May 2, 2012 Quote You *do* realize the post you replied to was from LAST YEAR, right? Nope, but at least it enticed her to start PM'ing me with PA's again...What can I say...redhead bitches turn me on.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #137 May 2, 2012 Apparently she can't join us here in the SC to reply...I know you miss her tx....I sure do. Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #138 May 2, 2012 Quote Apparently she can't join us here in the SC to reply...I know you miss her tx....I sure do. Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #139 May 2, 2012 Warning to all, I guess...do not take advantage of your posting privileges - they can be taken away indefinitely. If it can happen to Amazon, then it can happen to anyone.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #140 May 2, 2012 QuoteWhat can I say...redhead bitches turn me on. If you are going to call her a bitch, at least do it somewhere she can respond. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #141 May 4, 2012 Quote Quote What can I say...redhead bitches turn me on. If you are going to call her a bitch, at least do it somewhere she can respond. She did respond...she said that's funny coming from the drunken fairy of SC, lol... We actually have friendly convos via pm.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #142 May 4, 2012 Then keep it in pm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #143 May 4, 2012 I didn't know she was banned at the time...mind your own business.Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
