0
StreetScooby

$1.5 trillion dollar deficits

Recommended Posts

Quote


you agree that whatever happens to the rich - they're not going to starve. unlike the poor...



How do you think people get rich in America? By and large, they take risks and work their ass off, for a very long time. They commit their life to it. These are the people who produce jobs and growth in GDP. The government doesn't do that.

I care very much what happens to the "rich". If their hard earned money is confiscated, then who's going to put the effort in required to build and own a company? Then, when that happens, where is the government going to get its money?
We are all engines of karma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


taxed



25% is taxed. Start getting much over that, and it's confiscatory.



on the other hand - if they hadn't of confiscated so much of our wealth in the first place we wouldn't be asking for it back now would we?
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


if they hadn't of confiscated so much of our wealth in the first place we wouldn't be asking for it back now would we?



I don't think markets are perfect, but they are the only proven mechanism that's been able to increase living standards for a society. In order for markets to work, there must be many sellers and many buyers. When that gets out of whack, it's no longer a market as defined, and issues can arise.
We are all engines of karma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


they must be well regulated by government...



And that's a never ending balance. Well regulated vs. over/under regulated. Alot of this balance is dictated by how well educated a society is.



the market has been badly regulated, letting the rich accrue too much wealth which they then use to further 'tilt' the market their way. this is why the rich don't want a well educated society - enough to do the 'clever' jobs for them but no more...
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


this is why the rich don't want a well educated society



Ultimately, it's the family's responsibility to educate their children, independent of what the "rich" think.



no, it's society's job to educate the next generation...
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Revenues didn't drop under Bush! They rose to record levels.

The problem was that spending increased more quickly that revenues. That is until the market crashed and revenues did drop.

Which is, of course, when spending accelerated astronomically.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


no, it's society's job to educate the next generation...



We'll have to agree to disagree on that point. One of the problems with our federal government's approach to welfare is the dismantling of the traditional family. "Rewarding" mother's for having children out of wedlock is not the correct path to take. Same problem in Britain. When girls have children out of wedlock so they can get council housing, that should be a red flag that something is wrong.

Government should emphasize productive citizens. Productive citizens are responsible and can take care of themselves and their family. Otherwise, you end up with a society that doesn't work (...no pun intended).
We are all engines of karma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Revenues didn't drop under Bush! They rose to record levels.

The problem was that spending increased more quickly that revenues. That is until the market crashed and revenues did drop.

Which is, of course, when spending accelerated astronomically.



pretty sure it dropped in the 2008 tax year (which settles up in April 2009). The point was that simply looking at deficit levels, rather than year revenues and spending makes it difficult to evaluate claims of Bush v Obama.

We've seen the boom and bust pattern in California every decade at least once - Sac jacks up spending during the good days and then when revenues dry up in a bad spell, budget balancing is a pain. Arnold tried his hardest to get measures in to level out the spending through the cycle, but he was just wasn't good enough on the political side to get it done.

Bush obliterated the notion that the Republicans are about small government or balanced budgets. Still can't tell if the Tea Party types are serious, or just taking advantage of their minority status to say things that won't actually be done (like any good Libertarian).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow, even columnists in Britain are starting to question the sustainability of the welfare state:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/janetdaley/8685945/If-we-are-to-survive-the-looming-catastrophe-we-need-to-face-the-truth.html

Quote


The hardest obstacle to overcome will be the idea that anyone who challenges the prevailing consensus of the past 50 years is irrational and irresponsible. That is what is being said about the Tea Partiers. In fact, what is irrational and irresponsible is the assumption that we can go on as we are.


We are all engines of karma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Wow, even columnists in Britain are starting to question the sustainability of the welfare state:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/janetdaley/8685945/If-we-are-to-survive-the-looming-catastrophe-we-need-to-face-the-truth.html

Quote


The hardest obstacle to overcome will be the idea that anyone who challenges the prevailing consensus of the past 50 years is irrational and irresponsible. That is what is being said about the Tea Partiers. In fact, what is irrational and irresponsible is the assumption that we can go on as we are.



wow, we have a right wing press here as well...
stay away from moving propellers - they bite
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0