billvon 2,991 #276 September 30, 2011 >but Obama is using that to cover his failures and push the leftist agenda. Right. When Obama blames Bush, he is using that to cover his failures and push his leftist agenda. When Bush blames Clinton, he is doing that to honestly state the facts, save children and puppies, and kill the evil Osama bin Laden. You spin better than even RushMC. >things were much butter under Bush until the dems took over congress. And things were much better under Clinton - until Bush took over. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #277 September 30, 2011 Quote>but Obama is using that to cover his failures and push the leftist agenda. Right. When Obama blames Bush, he is using that to cover his failures and push his leftist agenda. When Bush blames Clinton, he is doing that to honestly state the facts, save children and puppies, and kill the evil Osama bin Laden. You spin better than even RushMC. >things were much butter under Bush until the dems took over congress. And things were much better under Clinton - until Bush took over. not for me and many others, I was worse off in the late 90's and got back on my feet after 2000 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #278 September 30, 2011 >not for me and many others, I was worse off in the late 90's and got back on my feet >after 2000 That's too bad. Most people were better off in the late 90's, when unemployment was 4%, than in 2003, when unemployment was 6%. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #279 September 30, 2011 Quote>not for me and many others, I was worse off in the late 90's and got back on my feet >after 2000 That's too bad. Most people were better off in the late 90's, when unemployment was 4%, than in 2003, when unemployment was 6%. My pay decreased each year from 95- 2000 and lost most benifits. my pay has gone up each year since until 2009 when it started decreasing again. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #280 September 30, 2011 >My pay decreased each year from 95- 2000 and lost most benifits. I could have retired on my investments in 1999. By 2005 they had fallen to about 1/3 of their original value. Fortunately my pay has been going up in the meantime. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #281 September 30, 2011 Quote>My pay decreased each year from 95- 2000 and lost most benifits. I could have retired on my investments in 1999. By 2005 they had fallen to about 1/3 of their original value. Fortunately my pay has been going up in the meantime. over the lst 30 years my pay goes up with a rep president and down with a dem president Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #282 September 30, 2011 >over the lst 30 years my pay goes up with a rep president and down >with a dem president Hmm. Mine's gone up pretty steadily over the years. Maybe you get so angry when democrats are in office that you get fired more often for spending all your time on line? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #283 September 30, 2011 Quote>over the lst 30 years my pay goes up with a rep president and down >with a dem president Hmm. Mine's gone up pretty steadily over the years. Maybe you get so angry when democrats are in office that you get fired more often for spending all your time on line? Lame attempted smear, Bill.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #284 September 30, 2011 Quote>over the lst 30 years my pay goes up with a rep president and down >with a dem president Hmm. Mine's gone up pretty steadily over the years. Maybe you get so angry when democrats are in office that you get fired more often for spending all your time on line? If Obama would get out of the way of the economy maybe I wouldn't have the time to sit on the computer and types things that make the liberals heads pop off. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #285 September 30, 2011 >maybe I wouldn't have the time to sit on the computer and types things that make the >liberals heads pop off. If you didn't sit at the computer and type political rants all day to try to piss people off you might just make more money! Come to think of it, if you spent less time trying to piss people off period you might get more work. Or you can keep doing it if it entertains you, and you don't care about the money. Whatever floats your boat. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #286 September 30, 2011 Quote>maybe I wouldn't have the time to sit on the computer and types things that make the >liberals heads pop off. If you didn't sit at the computer and type political rants all day to try to piss people off you might just make more money! Come to think of it, if you spent less time trying to piss people off period you might get more work. Or you can keep doing it if it entertains you, and you don't care about the money. Whatever floats your boat. the issue isn't lack of work, the issue is a lack of people with money to pay for the work. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #287 September 30, 2011 QuoteQuote>maybe I wouldn't have the time to sit on the computer and types things that make the >liberals heads pop off. If you didn't sit at the computer and type political rants all day to try to piss people off you might just make more money! Come to think of it, if you spent less time trying to piss people off period you might get more work. Or you can keep doing it if it entertains you, and you don't care about the money. Whatever floats your boat. the issue isn't lack of work, the issue is a lack of people with money to pay for the work. That's immaterial, since it doesn't leave an opportunity for Bill to make his snide remarks at your expense.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #288 September 30, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuote>maybe I wouldn't have the time to sit on the computer and types things that make the >liberals heads pop off. If you didn't sit at the computer and type political rants all day to try to piss people off you might just make more money! Come to think of it, if you spent less time trying to piss people off period you might get more work. Or you can keep doing it if it entertains you, and you don't care about the money. Whatever floats your boat. the issue isn't lack of work, the issue is a lack of people with money to pay for the work. That's immaterial, since it doesn't leave an opportunity for Bill to make his snide remarks at your expense. the right wants to make people work the left wants to control what they think everyone is entitled to. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #289 October 1, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>maybe I wouldn't have the time to sit on the computer and types things that make the >liberals heads pop off. If you didn't sit at the computer and type political rants all day to try to piss people off you might just make more money! Come to think of it, if you spent less time trying to piss people off period you might get more work. Or you can keep doing it if it entertains you, and you don't care about the money. Whatever floats your boat. the issue isn't lack of work, the issue is a lack of people with money to pay for the work. That's immaterial, since it doesn't leave an opportunity for Bill to make his snide remarks at your expense. the right wants to make people work the left wants to control what they think everyone is entitled to. It sure wasn't a bunch of liberals who trashed the stock market, caused skyrocketing unemployment, got bailed out by taxpayers, and then walked off with $millions in bonuses.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #290 October 2, 2011 Quote It sure wasn't a bunch of liberals who trashed the stock market, caused skyrocketing unemployment, got bailed out by taxpayers, and then walked off with $millions in bonuses. why is it always so damn black & white with you? can liberals do no wrong? open your eyes man. there is corruption on both sides of the fence. they're almost all in it for their own good, not ours.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #291 October 2, 2011 >the right wants to make people work the left wants to control what they think >everyone is entitled to. Hmm. I guess I'm neither, then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #292 October 3, 2011 Quote It sure wasn't a bunch of liberals who trashed the stock market, caused skyrocketing unemployment, got bailed out by taxpayers, and then walked off with $millions in bonuses. Did you survey to verify this? Since education and intelligence has some correlation with liberalism, and bonuses are based on success, surely some of them are liberal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #293 October 3, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>maybe I wouldn't have the time to sit on the computer and types things that make the >liberals heads pop off. If you didn't sit at the computer and type political rants all day to try to piss people off you might just make more money! Come to think of it, if you spent less time trying to piss people off period you might get more work. Or you can keep doing it if it entertains you, and you don't care about the money. Whatever floats your boat. the issue isn't lack of work, the issue is a lack of people with money to pay for the work. That's immaterial, since it doesn't leave an opportunity for Bill to make his snide remarks at your expense. the right wants to make people work the left wants to control what they think everyone is entitled to. It sure wasn't a bunch of liberals who trashed the stock market, caused skyrocketing unemployment, got bailed out by taxpayers, and then walked off with $millions in bonuses. you might want to rethink that Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weekender 0 #294 October 3, 2011 QuoteQuote It sure wasn't a bunch of liberals who trashed the stock market, caused skyrocketing unemployment, got bailed out by taxpayers, and then walked off with $millions in bonuses. Did you survey to verify this? Since education and intelligence has some correlation with liberalism, and bonuses are based on success, surely some of them are liberal. C'mon your saying there are rich liberal bankers who live in West Chester and Bergen Counties?. Not possible, those are all right leaning conservative places. No one who works on Wall Street and is wealthy is a liberal or supports liberals politicians. Just no possible. When you are so full of hate and jealousy you completely lose grasp on reality. The NY metro area is one of the most liberal places in the US."The point is, I'm weird, but I never felt weird." John Frusciante Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #295 October 3, 2011 QuoteWhen you are so full of hate and jealousy you completely lose grasp on reality. and join the tea party...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mirage62 0 #296 October 3, 2011 Quote That's too bad. Most people were better off in the late 90's, when unemployment was 4%, than in 2003, when unemployment was 6%. And certainly people were better off when unemployment was below 9%. I struggle when I read post by someone who's thinking I normally admire but may disagree with (Bill) who seems to get so vested in defending Obama over say Bush. Overall it seems clear that Bush did not blame the problems he was dealing with as much on Clinton as Obama has blamed on Bush. Obama is running out of time with the American peopleKevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #297 October 4, 2011 QuoteOverall it seems clear that Bush did not blame the problems he was dealing with as much on Clinton as Obama has blamed on Bush. That's cause Bush got Osama and mushroom clouds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #298 January 7, 2012 Latest on tax cheats: money.cnn.com/2012/01/06/news/economy/tax_gap/?source=cnn_bin "What's driving the shortfall? A whopping 84% of the total tax gap is due to underreporting of income by corporations, small businesses and individuals. But underreporting by small businesses and others who report business income on the individual tax return is the biggest single culprit, accounting for more than a quarter of the gap."... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matthewcline 0 #299 January 7, 2012 Quote Latest on tax cheats: money.cnn.com/2012/01/06/news/economy/tax_gap/?source=cnn_bin "What's driving the shortfall? A whopping 84% of the total tax gap is due to underreporting of income by corporations, small businesses and individuals. But underreporting by small businesses and others who report business income on the individual tax return is the biggest single culprit, accounting for more than a quarter of the gap." The Author quotes six your old numbers. So the blame is on Millionaires, Small Business Owners, and 1099 Contractors (none W-2 holders), correct? Now what is the damage when you add the Sub Contractors who then file for unemployment as well? MattAn Instructors first concern is student safety. So, start being safe, first!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #300 January 7, 2012 QuoteQuote Latest on tax cheats: money.cnn.com/2012/01/06/news/economy/tax_gap/?source=cnn_bin "What's driving the shortfall? A whopping 84% of the total tax gap is due to underreporting of income by corporations, small businesses and individuals. But underreporting by small businesses and others who report business income on the individual tax return is the biggest single culprit, accounting for more than a quarter of the gap." The Author quotes six your old numbers. "according to new estimates by the IRS. That's the net tax gap number -- meaning what didn't get paid even after the $65 billion the IRS managed to collect through audits. And it's the closest proxy policymakers have to the country's annual revenue shortfall So the IRS is years behind in indentifying the cheats. Better late than never. Quote So the blame is on Millionaires, Small Business Owners, and 1099 Contractors (none W-2 holders), correct? Very hard to cheat if you are salaried and have to turn in your W2. Quote Now what is the damage when you add the Sub Contractors who then file for unemployment as well? Matt Good question. Fact remains that the heroes of the GOP appear to be the biggest tax cheats.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites