dreamdancer 0 #1 September 17, 2011 what a sad man... QuoteTexas Governor Rick Perry uses his state’s reputation for killing without question to gain applause for his presidential bid from Tea Party audiences that cannot contain their bloodlust. Perry, the frontrunner for the Republican party’s 2012 nomination claims he “never struggled” with questions of justice and injustice, right and wrong, when it comes to approving the executions of Texans. That’s because, Perry says, “the state of Texas has a very thoughtful, very clear process in place.” On Thursday night, that “very thoughtful, very clear process” was due to execute the 236th inmate to die on Perry’s watch. But the latest victim, Duane Edward Buck, had been sentenced to death after an “expert witness” told jurors in Houston that Buck posed a greater threat to public safety because he was African-American. That racially biased sentencing process drew objections from one of the prosecutors in the case, Linda Geffin, who wrote: “I felt compelled to step forward [because] of the improper injection of race into the sentencing hearing in Mr. Buck’s case.” Former Texas Attorney General John Cornyn, a conservative Republican who now serves on the US Senate’s Judiciary Committee, had moved to secure new hearings for defendants sentenced to death in circumstances similar to Buck’s, with Cornyn saying: “It is inappropriate to allow race to be considered as a factor in our criminal justice system.” http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/09/16-8stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #2 September 17, 2011 Gotta love unbiased reporting! That said, the Supremes did right by granting a stay so the case can be reviewed concerning the statement(s) made. HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,452 #3 September 17, 2011 What he said. I'm no Perry fan, and I think he should have required a review long, long ago. A pardon is not appropriate -- the guy is guilty as sin. A commutation is not necessarily appropriate -- a re-sentencing is utterly appropriate. The stupid statement was made during the sentencing phase, and undoubtedly was considered by the jury. Whether he would have been sentenced to death anyway (a distinct possibility ) is debatable; this was a pretty egregious crime, with children involved. I'm glad it's turned out the way it did -- he's getting the re-review of sentencing, and it makes Perry look like a dick Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #4 September 17, 2011 Quote What he said. I'm no Perry fan, and I think he should have required a review long, long ago. A pardon is not appropriate -- the guy is guilty as sin. A commutation is not necessarily appropriate -- a re-sentencing is utterly appropriate. The stupid statement was made during the sentencing phase, and undoubtedly was considered by the jury. Whether he would have been sentenced to death anyway (a distinct possibility ) is debatable; this was a pretty egregious crime, with children involved. I'm glad it's turned out the way it did -- he's getting the re-review of sentencing, and it makes Perry look like a dick Wendy P. So, something perry did not do, in a state that people support capital punishment, makes him look like a dick? I could see coming down on the person that used race at the sentencing hearing and havig a judge review it, but this does not make perry a dick. This make Perry look like someone that upholds the laws that the people of his state support. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #5 September 17, 2011 Quote Quote What he said. I'm no Perry fan, and I think he should have required a review long, long ago. A pardon is not appropriate -- the guy is guilty as sin. A commutation is not necessarily appropriate -- a re-sentencing is utterly appropriate. The stupid statement was made during the sentencing phase, and undoubtedly was considered by the jury. Whether he would have been sentenced to death anyway (a distinct possibility ) is debatable; this was a pretty egregious crime, with children involved. I'm glad it's turned out the way it did -- he's getting the re-review of sentencing, and it makes Perry look like a dick Wendy P. So, something perry did not do, in a state that people support capital punishment, makes him look like a dick? I could see coming down on the person that used race at the sentencing hearing and havig a judge review it, but this does not make perry a dick. This make Perry look like someone that upholds the laws that the people of his state support. Perry knew about the statements made and it was pointed out to him how it could have influenced the jury during sentencing. He could have granted the stay and ordered a review but he chose not to. He chose to allow a man to face execution knowing full well that he may not have received a fair sentence. That does not make him look like a dick. It only comfirms what people already know...that he is a dick.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #6 September 17, 2011 Quote Quote Quote What he said. I'm no Perry fan, and I think he should have required a review long, long ago. A pardon is not appropriate -- the guy is guilty as sin. A commutation is not necessarily appropriate -- a re-sentencing is utterly appropriate. The stupid statement was made during the sentencing phase, and undoubtedly was considered by the jury. Whether he would have been sentenced to death anyway (a distinct possibility ) is debatable; this was a pretty egregious crime, with children involved. I'm glad it's turned out the way it did -- he's getting the re-review of sentencing, and it makes Perry look like a dick Wendy P. So, something perry did not do, in a state that people support capital punishment, makes him look like a dick? I could see coming down on the person that used race at the sentencing hearing and havig a judge review it, but this does not make perry a dick. This make Perry look like someone that upholds the laws that the people of his state support. Perry knew about the statements made and it was pointed out to him how it could have influenced the jury during sentencing. He could have granted the stay and ordered a review but he chose not to. He chose to allow a man to face execution knowing full well that he may not have received a fair sentence. That does not make him look like a dick. It only comfirms what people already know...that he is a dick. no he allowed the legal process to work, or are you all about over riding the legal process? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #7 September 17, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote What he said. I'm no Perry fan, and I think he should have required a review long, long ago. A pardon is not appropriate -- the guy is guilty as sin. A commutation is not necessarily appropriate -- a re-sentencing is utterly appropriate. The stupid statement was made during the sentencing phase, and undoubtedly was considered by the jury. Whether he would have been sentenced to death anyway (a distinct possibility ) is debatable; this was a pretty egregious crime, with children involved. I'm glad it's turned out the way it did -- he's getting the re-review of sentencing, and it makes Perry look like a dick Wendy P. So, something perry did not do, in a state that people support capital punishment, makes him look like a dick? I could see coming down on the person that used race at the sentencing hearing and havig a judge review it, but this does not make perry a dick. This make Perry look like someone that upholds the laws that the people of his state support. Perry knew about the statements made and it was pointed out to him how it could have influenced the jury during sentencing. He could have granted the stay and ordered a review but he chose not to. He chose to allow a man to face execution knowing full well that he may not have received a fair sentence. That does not make him look like a dick. It only comfirms what people already know...that he is a dick. no he allowed the legal process to work, or are you all about over riding the legal process? He refused to make the decision himself when he was in a position to do so. "Passing the buck" is a sign of a poor leader and a dick.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #8 September 17, 2011 Quote Quote Quote What he said. I'm no Perry fan, and I think he should have required a review long, long ago. A pardon is not appropriate -- the guy is guilty as sin. A commutation is not necessarily appropriate -- a re-sentencing is utterly appropriate. The stupid statement was made during the sentencing phase, and undoubtedly was considered by the jury. Whether he would have been sentenced to death anyway (a distinct possibility ) is debatable; this was a pretty egregious crime, with children involved. I'm glad it's turned out the way it did -- he's getting the re-review of sentencing, and it makes Perry look like a dick Wendy P. So, something perry did not do, in a state that people support capital punishment, makes him look like a dick? I could see coming down on the person that used race at the sentencing hearing and havig a judge review it, but this does not make perry a dick. This make Perry look like someone that upholds the laws that the people of his state support. Perry knew about the statements made and it was pointed out to him how it could have influenced the jury during sentencing. He could have granted the stay and ordered a review but he chose not to. He chose to allow a man to face execution knowing full well that he may not have received a fair sentence. That does not make him look like a dick. It only comfirms what people already know...that he is a dick. The same "expert" made similar statements in 5 other sentencing hearings. The other 5 were reviewed and resentenced. This one wasn't. He's guilty as sin, and probably will end up being executed. But having statements made by "expert witnesses" that a black man is more likely to be violent in the future because he is black is a pretty good reason to review the sentencing."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #9 September 18, 2011 Quotewhat a sad man... QuoteIt is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. So how's your life going? Tell rhys "hi" for us at your next meeintg.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites