Recommended Posts
Quote>Bill put out a story about a pathetic negligent discharge, but it doesn't
>take much to avoid those. To accidentally kill your wife, you have to
>violate pretty much all of the basic rules for handling guns.
Definitely agreed. But that's true of a great many activities - driving, skydiving etc - and people regularly make incredibly bad decisions that result in their (or someone else's) death. It's part of the risk equation.Quote
To a degree. People have a lot of NDs. But I am not people. I don't measure my risk by the lowest common denominator. My guns don't "just go off" and I did 180 jumps without a malfunction. (That wasn't my great packing skill - I'd give most credit to selection of two triathlons and a pilot as the main)Quote
So - how many cases have there been in the past 4 years where a man shot and killed an intruder who was threatening his wife's life?
A lot more than 5. BTW, how did they determine it was really an accident in your last example? I'm suspicious of ND homicides. It seems like an easy defense to make.
The strongest argument to make against gun ownership is the suicide rate, though you would need to ignore that there are other methods readily available.
nigel99 476
I think you are probably in a situation where you have a higher likelihood of having a violent or abusive individual force their way into your home while you are awake and giving you the opportunity to better defend yourself.
For Joe average I think gun ownership does more to make the owner "feel" safe than it actually achieves in practice.
Somebody breaks into your home, ties up your family and tortures them for a bit, even threatens to execute your wife and kids....
Should you manage to break free and fight them off and harm the person who broke into your home? YOU get arrested for assault.
Ten years ago, farmer unloaded a shotgun into a burglar, he got done for manslaughter...3 months ago a gang of 4 men with knives enter a man's home. A fight ensues man grabs knife and sticks it in the intruder... gets arrested for murder and put in jail (jail as in remand prison where they hold people while investigations occur)
oh, I don't think it hurts (unless the other party files a countering RO request and is granted, as typical in divorce proceedings. Until recently, that meant no gun rights for you either). But as I said, it's not a get out of jail free card. In a state like CA, you still have to have been in immediate danger. And you'd still be in that same situation if an ex SO broke into your house without an existing RO. In a state like Texas, maybe violating the RO is enough to allow a legal shooting under any circumstances.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites