0
brenthutch

The case for wind farms

Recommended Posts

Quote

How well do you think our species at this stage in our civilization would handle such a change?



Edited to add: as a side note, comparing our species at this stage of development to our species at the stage of development in 2100 is difficult. It's the same as asking, "How well do you think our species at the stage in our civilization of 1920 would handle such changes as we are seeing now?"

As Charlie Duke said, plenty of people long ago predicted that we'd put men on the moon. None of those people had any idea that the world would be watching it on television.

I think the human species will do what it has done with all climate change throughout its history: (1) Either adapt to the environment; or (2) Adapt the environment to us.

Check out the Netherlands. 25% of it is below sea level. 50% of it is one meter or less in sea level. They have managed the problems that even they create by draining swampland, thus lowering the ground level more. But for roughly the last thousand years, the Dutch have managed it, improved upon it and grown it.

If/when the sea level rises, it won’t be a “smack in the face” as Amazon suggests. It will be gradual. The alarmists (most of them) are even backing off of their predictions. Rather than wholesale disaster and rapid inundation of coastal areas, they are looking at inconvenience and long-term contingency planning.

I don’t like putting all of our chips in the basket of uncertainty – which there is. For years, the argument has been, “We cannot afford not to do this because we cannot take the chance that it won’t.” That’s not sound policy in my book. It’s the equivalent of putting out trillions of dollars to put gravity tractors by every near-earth object because we cannot take the chance that it won’t hit us in the future.”

No, it doesn’t mean I’m pro-asteroid. It does not mean that I am a misanthrope for ignoring the risk of asteroid impact. It does not mean that I am anti-science. It does mean that I prefer to look at balancing the needs of the present, near future, middle future and long-term future. The people of the US – and even Europe and the planet – seem to agree that there are far greater and more immediate issues than this to deal with.

Note: not that non-immediate risks are bad. I’ve been thoroughly pissed off at the redirection of infrastructure funding to other purposes. The planners of the interstate highway system, perhaps, should have predicted that once the money was spent to build it that the money would not be spent to maintain it. Put simply, there’s a delicate balance that is reached, and each thing balanced is based on subjective ideas of what is and is not important.

I'm not wrong any more than I am correct. Neither are you wrong or right. It's what we each feel is important.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

>the glaciers have been melting since the last ice age, are you saying
>that we have changed that fact?

Nope. They're just melting a lot faster.



This is a statement that leaves me a bit frustrated. You know that 12k years ago, New York City was under ice a miles thick. By 10k years ago, NYC was there and the climate warmed so quickly that it is likely that spruce forests changed to pine forest in the span of a lifetime.



How well do you think our species at this stage in our civilization would handle such a change?



I don't know, maybe like I can handle the change from the Bahamas to Aspen in just a few weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just seen this. Don't come to SC very much, you'all to high fluting for me.


Their is NO CASE for wind farms, (except in the middle of the Atlantic or Pacific)
They are 100% polution,
I own a mountain, when I was aproached by a company to install a wind farm
I told them, (Over my dead body) thay tried to go over my head so the village
held a referendum and to a man the vote was NO,

The other side of the mountain their are wind farms and the villagers regret
ever saying yes,

The only people who benefit are the owners of the access roads and the land owners
who for the most are absent landlords so it dosen't affect them.


The way ahead is to build more safer and more efficient nuclear power plants.

Gone fishing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>the glaciers have been melting since the last ice age, are you saying
>that we have changed that fact?

Nope. They're just melting a lot faster.



This is a statement that leaves me a bit frustrated. You know that 12k years ago, New York City was under ice a miles thick. By 10k years ago, NYC was there and the climate warmed so quickly that it is likely that spruce forests changed to pine forest in the span of a lifetime.



How well do you think our species at this stage in our civilization would handle such a change?



I don't know, maybe like I can handle the change from the Bahamas to Aspen in just a few weeks.



That has to be the most idiotic statement you've yet made on SC, and you've made some.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Jealous much?



Nope. I'm off to the Galapagos:P



Each to his own, Liberal tortoises with their heads stuffed in their shell


Nonsense. Tortoises are as conservative as it's possible to be.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wind power in the US in 2001: .2% of our total generation
Wind power in the US in 2011: 2.3% of our total generation

>I own a mountain, when I was aproached by a company to install a wind farm
>I told them, (Over my dead body)

Yep. NIMBYs are, unfortunately, a big factor in our power decisions.

>The only people who benefit are the owners of the access roads and the land
>owners who for the most are absent landlords farmers so it dosen't affect them.

Fixed that. Yes, farmers often benefit from wind farms. And of course the people who use the power. And the people who don't get emphysema as quickly.

>The way ahead is to build more safer and more efficient nuclear power plants.

And they will try to build them, and the locals will say (over my dead body.) And they will be just as right as you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fixed that. Yes, farmers often benefit from wind farms. And of course the people who use the power. And the people who don't get emphysema as quickly.

.



The wind companies have shit in their own nest around here
They will get few if any more leases to build these wastes of space and money

The only places they are building (for the most part) is on land where they got the leases signed prior to the first ones being built

The noise is horable

But you have already stated that you dont care if land values fall if that fact supports your green world view.

NOTE: there are many non-farmers who home sites are becoming unmarketable because of these monstrosities

Not in my back yard?

Damn straight not in my back yard!

and the counties are passing ordances to inforce just that
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>The wind companies have shit in their own nest around here

I guess that's why installed capacity has been increasing an average of 30% a year over the past decade.

>Damn straight not in my back yard!

Yep. The cry of every NIMBY everywhere. "Someone else do it!"

>NOTE: there are many non-farmers who home sites are becoming unmarketable
>because of these monstrosities

I bet these people would do almost anything to have homes in your so-called "unmarketable" sites:

===================
The TVA Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill occurred just before 1 a.m. on Monday December 22, 2008, when an ash dike ruptured at an 84-acre (0.34 km2) solid waste containment area at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant in Roane County, Tennessee, USA. 1.1 billion US gallons (4,200,000 m3) of coal fly ash slurry was released. . . .

The spill caused a mudflow wave of water and ash that covered 12 homes, pushing one entirely off its foundation, rendering three uninhabitable, and caused some damage to 42 residential properties. It also washed out a road, ruptured a major gas line, obstructed a rail line, downed trees, broke a water main, and destroyed power lines.

The spill covered surrounding land with up to six feet of sludge. The EPA first estimated that the spill would take four to six weeks to clean up; however, Chandra Taylor, the staff attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, said the cleanup could take months and possibly years. As of June 2009, six months following the spill, only 3% of the spill had been cleaned and is now estimated to cost between $675 and $975 million to clean, according to the TVA.
=======================

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>The wind companies have shit in their own nest around here

I guess that's why installed capacity has been increasing an average of 30% a year over the past decade.

>Damn straight not in my back yard!

Yep. The cry of every NIMBY everywhere. "Someone else do it!"

>NOTE: there are many non-farmers who home sites are becoming unmarketable
>because of these monstrosities

I bet these people would do almost anything to have homes in your so-called "unmarketable" sites:

===================
The TVA Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill occurred just before 1 a.m. on Monday December 22, 2008, when an ash dike ruptured at an 84-acre (0.34 km2) solid waste containment area at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant in Roane County, Tennessee, USA. 1.1 billion US gallons (4,200,000 m3) of coal fly ash slurry was released. . . .

The spill caused a mudflow wave of water and ash that covered 12 homes, pushing one entirely off its foundation, rendering three uninhabitable, and caused some damage to 42 residential properties. It also washed out a road, ruptured a major gas line, obstructed a rail line, downed trees, broke a water main, and destroyed power lines.

The spill covered surrounding land with up to six feet of sludge. The EPA first estimated that the spill would take four to six weeks to clean up; however, Chandra Taylor, the staff attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, said the cleanup could take months and possibly years. As of June 2009, six months following the spill, only 3% of the spill had been cleaned and is now estimated to cost between $675 and $975 million to clean, according to the TVA.
=======================



One acident (or failure of a company) does not make your position more solid.

Damns have caused more damage and death than this ONE example you give

Going to get rid of them too?

And the capacity growth is ONLY because the gov subsidies

Unles extended the growth will slow or end at the end of 2012



The wind farms were allowed here in good faith
Nothing prepared the locals for what they are going through now
So NIMBY? cant claim that here cause they are already here

There will only be more on lands that have already been leased cause no one else here will give the SOB's any more land than they all ready have


Waste of money and land
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[Reply]NIMBYs are, unfortunately, a big factor in our power decisions.



Just as a curiosity, what is unfortunate about NIMBY? I think it's one of the great things about private property ownership. Who wants a freeway running through their backyard? Or a runway being built that will have his house subject to jet noise at all hours?

NIMBY is private right taking precedence over public opinion. NIMBYism always sucks until it's your house that will become much less of a lovely place to be.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>The wind companies have shit in their own nest around here

I guess that's why installed capacity has been increasing an average of 30% a year over the past decade.

>Damn straight not in my back yard!

Yep. The cry of every NIMBY everywhere. "Someone else do it!"

>NOTE: there are many non-farmers who home sites are becoming unmarketable
>because of these monstrosities

I bet these people would do almost anything to have homes in your so-called "unmarketable" sites:

===================
The TVA Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill occurred just before 1 a.m. on Monday December 22, 2008, when an ash dike ruptured at an 84-acre (0.34 km2) solid waste containment area at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant in Roane County, Tennessee, USA. 1.1 billion US gallons (4,200,000 m3) of coal fly ash slurry was released. . . .

The spill caused a mudflow wave of water and ash that covered 12 homes, pushing one entirely off its foundation, rendering three uninhabitable, and caused some damage to 42 residential properties. It also washed out a road, ruptured a major gas line, obstructed a rail line, downed trees, broke a water main, and destroyed power lines.

The spill covered surrounding land with up to six feet of sludge. The EPA first estimated that the spill would take four to six weeks to clean up; however, Chandra Taylor, the staff attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, said the cleanup could take months and possibly years. As of June 2009, six months following the spill, only 3% of the spill had been cleaned and is now estimated to cost between $675 and $975 million to clean, according to the TVA.
=======================



One acident (or failure of a company) does not make your position more solid.

Damns have caused more damage and death than this ONE example you give



Damn coal mines?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You dont really expect Marc to look up the VERY long and devastating list of coal mine disasters, coal mine deaths, coal mine pollution, and the vast areas of environmental degradation of the land water and air in the last 250 years worldwide. I wonder what the total death toll from his favorite industry REALLLY is... MILLIONS would not be a stretch from direct and indirect human lives lost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Gonna take it back from eveybodya?
Farmers? Solar? Wind? All of them?



Well, I'm only talking about energy subsidies, but yeah, take it back from everyone. Ethanol, solar, wind, coal, oil, nuclear.

My point is, it is unfair to complain about subsidies for emerging technologies but be okay with past subsidies (and continuing, completely ridiculous subsidies) to established technologies.



And you point is well taken

However
Solar and wind can not turn profits even with subsidies. At least coal, gas and oil will survive with out gov help

Those others can not



Stopped at a wind turbine yesterday to see what kind of noise it made.

Unfortunately a freight train (coal) was passing at the time, and the noise it made completely drowned out the sound of the turbine.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Just as a curiosity, what is unfortunate about NIMBY?

It replaces logical decisionmaking with emotion, which overall is unfortunate. It means that nuclear power plants are not built within 500 miles of someone's home while a research reactor operates a few miles from the person.

>Who wants a freeway running through their backyard?

Well, no one; who wants to lose their back yard? (You understand, of course, that "their back yard" has almost nothing to do with NIMBYs; they protest things that are hundreds of miles away.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Still waiting for the obit that shows that power plant emissions killed someone

============
HSPH Report Quantifies Health Impact of Air Pollution From Two Massachusetts Power Plants

For immediate release: May 04, 2000

Boston, MA--Air pollution from two Massachusetts coal-fired power plants contributes to particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone exposure over a large region. Using a sophisticated model of how particulate matter and its precursors are dispersed in the atmosphere, Harvard School of Public Health scientists Jonathan Levy and John D. Spengler have calculated exposures to 32 million residents living in New England, eastern New York and New Jersey from these older plants.

Their report estimated that current emissions from the Salem Harbor and Brayton Point power plants can be linked to more than 43,000 asthma attacks and nearly 300,000 incidents of upper respiratory symptoms per year in the region. The study also estimated that 159 premature deaths per year could be attributed to this pollution.

The health risks are greatest for people living closer to the plants. Twenty percent of the total health impact occurs on 8 percent of the population that lives within 30 miles of the facilities.
============



Here is another study and comments

http://junkscience.com/2011/11/07/huge-study-air-pollution-asthma-epidemic-link-in-tatters/

Not air polution?

Hmmmmmm
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Stopped at a wind turbine yesterday to see what kind of noise it made.

Unfortunately a freight train (coal) was passing at the time, and the noise it made completely drowned out the sound of the turbine.



A good point... but you must admit that a train does not run by 24/7 and a wind turbine could.

BTW, I am all FOR alternative energy methods to include wind and solar.... But you must admit my point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0