dreamdancer 0 #101 November 16, 2011 and it was bloomberg, one of the 1%, who said that he alone gave the final decision. we all now know that he stands with wall street and not the people. round two coming shortly...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 800 #102 November 16, 2011 Agreed. I try to find unbiased news every time I hear something news worthy that interests me. It IS quite challenging. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #103 November 16, 2011 Quote Quote Why the hell would we want to read ANYTHING on that biased site? If you're going to exclude biased sources, you'll have to exclude anything owned by Rupert Murdoch (FOX, The WSJ...) and Newsmax too. Mikee... would implode..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #104 November 16, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Why the hell would we want to read ANYTHING on that biased site? If you're going to exclude biased sources, you'll have to exclude anything owned by Rupert Murdoch (FOX, The WSJ...) and Newsmax too. Mikee... would implode..... Says the woman that's linked to many times more Fox articles than I ever have...shall we compare?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #105 November 16, 2011 Occupy Calgary tent catches fire: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/calgary/burned+tent+fire+Olympic+Plaza+makeshift+home+Occupy+Calgary+protesters/5719432/story.html BTW ... it is a balmy -3C today in snow covered Cowtown. But temperatures are expected to dip close to -20C at night this coming weekend. The city should go around the squatters site this weekend and remove all unoccupied tents. It will be interesting to see how many of these Marxist squatters who hate businesses can handle the cold temperatures without their corporate supplied camping gear and mountaineering clothing. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 800 #106 November 16, 2011 Or the corporate supplied heating at mommy's home. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #107 November 16, 2011 Quoteand it was bloomberg, one of the 1%, who said that he alone gave the final decision. we all now know that he stands with wall street and not the people. round two coming shortly... Yes. He decided that a few hundred people are not more important than several million. Eventually you must come to the conclusion that 99 percent of the rest of us find out - in the grand scheme of things, not one of us is nearly as important as we wished we were. I am not so important that I think I am entitled to shit wherever I want. These protesters will return to the world and the idea that they made a difference will slowly erode. They will then complain because they haven't figured out that the world does not change by doing nothing but by doing something. Change takes work. Change takes hard work and discipline and goals. Change is not simply handed out and it is not something other people do. Take the advice of Fox News mouthpiece Bill Clinton - try being FOR something instead of just against something. Then work to achieve it. I know, I know. Achievement is such a bad word nowadays. It implies that people can actually succeed. Such a message is bad for the movement. The one percent will not let it happen, right? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #108 November 16, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Why the hell would we want to read ANYTHING on that biased site? If you're going to exclude biased sources, you'll have to exclude anything owned by Rupert Murdoch (FOX, The WSJ...) and Newsmax too. Mikee... would implode..... Says the woman that's linked to many times more Fox articles than I ever have...shall we compare? I link to them because some of the stupid fuckers on the far right.. will not take any news as legit..... unless it come from one of their approved news outlets such as the Pravda of the FRIGHT RIGHT. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #109 November 16, 2011 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Why the hell would we want to read ANYTHING on that biased site? If you're going to exclude biased sources, you'll have to exclude anything owned by Rupert Murdoch (FOX, The WSJ...) and Newsmax too. Mikee... would implode..... Says the woman that's linked to many times more Fox articles than I ever have...shall we compare? I link to them because some of the stupid fuckers on the far right.. will not take any news as legit..... unless it come from one of their approved news outlets such as the Pravda of the FRIGHT RIGHT. And I don't link them... which proves your statement above false, as usual.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #110 November 16, 2011 QuoteI link to them because some of the stupid fuckers on the far right.. will not take any news as legit..... unless it come from one of their approved news outlets such as the Pravda of the FRIGHT RIGHT. Which is equal and opposite to those stupid fuckers on the left who will not take any news as legit BECAUSE it comes from disapproved news outlets considered to be the Pravda of the FRIGHT RIGHT. Either way is goat fuck stupid. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #111 November 16, 2011 yep, bloomberg is one of the 1% and that's who he's standing by. and now we all know his stripes. meanwhile round two is about to begin...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #112 November 16, 2011 Quoteyep, bloomberg is one of the 1% and that's who he's standing by. and now we all know his stripes. meanwhile round two is about to begin... Define 1%. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #113 November 16, 2011 QuoteQuoteyep, bloomberg is one of the 1% and that's who he's standing by. and now we all know his stripes. meanwhile round two is about to begin... Define 1%. the 1% that bloomberg owes allegiance too...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 800 #114 November 16, 2011 I'm only slightly more curious as to what "round 2" could possibly entail. hhmmmmmm....buncha confused kids standing around doing nothing until it's time for dinner at mommy's? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #115 November 16, 2011 QuoteQuoteQuoteyep, bloomberg is one of the 1% and that's who he's standing by. and now we all know his stripes. meanwhile round two is about to begin... Define 1%. the 1% that bloomberg owes allegiance too... Great answer to a question that I did not ask. Tell me who the 1% are. Define them. You've had a couple of months to do this, so it should be a fairly simple thing for you to do. If after two months you don't even know who you are protesting, that indicates a MASSIVE problem on your part and an indication that the OWS movement is even more of a joke than I thought. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #116 November 16, 2011 if you don't know who the 1% are (and bloomberg is a good example) then you have the massive problem...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 800 #117 November 16, 2011 Funny. The "occupiers" don't even know who the 1% are. Much like some of the 1% that are playfully involved with "the movement". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #118 November 16, 2011 Quoteif you don't know who the 1% are (and bloomberg is a good example) then you have the massive problem... You are correct. I do not know who the 1% are because nobody has ever defined it. Is this another "keep it internal" thing like rapes? And Bloomberg is a mayor. Are government officials the 1%? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #119 November 16, 2011 Quote Quote I link to them because some of the stupid fuckers on the far right.. will not take any news as legit..... unless it come from one of their approved news outlets such as the Pravda of the FRIGHT RIGHT. Which is equal and opposite to those stupid fuckers on the left who will not take any news as legit BECAUSE it comes from disapproved news outlets considered to be the Pravda of the FRIGHT RIGHT. Either way is goat fuck stupid. The difference is... I just roll my eyes laugh my ass off at those who will only take FAUX News and the WSJ as the only things they find "fair and balanced" or the daily tripe from the EIB. I just use the approved sources to avoid the usual suspects having a Linda Blair head spinning event with green spewage if any non approved source is linked. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #120 November 16, 2011 Quoteif you don't know who the 1% are (and bloomberg is a good example) then you have the massive problem... Do you know who they are? Please share your definition, because I still haven't heard one. Like Voltaire said, “If you wish to converse with me, define your terms.”witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #121 November 16, 2011 QuoteQuoteif you don't know who the 1% are (and bloomberg is a good example) then you have the massive problem... Do you know who they are? Please share your definition, because I still haven't heard one. Like Voltaire said, “If you wish to converse with me, define your terms.” and as the common people say - if it waddles and quacks it's a duck...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #122 November 16, 2011 QuoteI'm only slightly more curious as to what "round 2" could possibly entail. hhmmmmmm....buncha confused kids standing around doing nothing until it's time for dinner at mommy's? yes, I need round 2 defined as well. Is that when the protesters get very sick and have to be hospitalized on the public dime? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #123 November 16, 2011 Quote Quote Why the hell would we want to read ANYTHING on that biased site? If you're going to exclude biased sources, you'll have to exclude anything owned by Rupert Murdoch (FOX, The WSJ...) and Newsmax too. Alternut is self contributed material, no? That puts it on par with the Examiner chain. No pretense of professionalism. Next step up is Fox and MSNBC and the WSJ. Not sure where to put Newsmax as I've never looked at it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #124 November 16, 2011 Quoteand as the common people say - if it waddles and quacks it's a duck... I don't see anyone protesting at Billvon's house. Nor do I think he made his money in the financial market. But if you insist, we can get a protest going - shit in his neighbor's mailbox, break the solar panels, etc..... (Though you do have a point - much of the top 1% of earners do consist of doctors and engineers and small/direct business people - much more than the portion of the 1% that did it via wall street. So maybe protesting small businesses and engineers and doctors is the way to go..........) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dreamdancer 0 #125 November 16, 2011 and why do you say that billvon is a member of the 1%...stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
