kallend 2,027 #26 September 13, 2012 QuoteQuoteThe negative is that it funnels most of that wealth to a very small elite while sharing only scraps with the labor that produced it. Capitalists then use that wealth to shape laws that assist them in accumulating more wealth. I have no idea why such rhetoric is put out there when we have labor laws, minimum wages, etc. as laws. The fact that such laws are there necessarily disproves your statement. . The fact that such laws were necessary in the first place disproves yours.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #27 September 13, 2012 QuoteIt's how the increase in wealth from the increase in productivity is distributed. Yeah. The workers didn't spend $1.5 million in that new machine, either. I hate to break it to you, but paying the employees more because you've paid money in order to have them to less is not common sensical. You don't pay more for less (unless you pay the government). Quotealmost like a tax on the worker imposed by the rich Indeed. just like the climate of Alaska is almost like the climate of Florida because both get snow. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #28 September 13, 2012 QuoteQuoteIt's how the increase in wealth from the increase in productivity is distributed. Yeah. The workers didn't spend $1.5 million in that new machine, either. I hate to break it to you, but paying the employees more because you've paid money in order to have them to less is not common sensical. You don't pay more for less (unless you pay the government). Quotealmost like a tax on the worker imposed by the rich Indeed. just like the climate of Alaska is almost like the climate of Florida because both get snow. Florida would actually be warmer than Alaska if it weren't for the higher temperatures.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #29 September 13, 2012 QuoteThe fact that such laws were necessary in the first place disproves yours. The fact that such laws were passed disproves his. What point of mine did he disprove? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #30 September 13, 2012 Quote Quote The fact that such laws were necessary in the first place disproves yours. The fact that such laws were passed disproves his. What point of mine did he disprove? So you're both wrong and I'm right... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
