0
jclalor

Florida Teen Shot

Recommended Posts

***
Nor did the kid look like he did any beating.


Not to sound violent,but if I punched someone in the nose,I would probably have no injuries on my fist at all.I could most likely bust most peoples jaw with no injury to my fist.
I know this from past experience,when I was a dumbass teenager(more prone to fight than rational).
Now if you were to drop your chin and tuck your head forward and I drilled you hard in the forehead,then it would most likely cause damage and pain to my hand.
If you have a young,strong and fit individual,they can give out alot of punishment with little or no damage to themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Only a few more days and they reel him in. Trial will be August time?



Yep, just in time for the elections so the Dems can demagogue the trial to stir up racial anomosity.



and that would do what exactly for the election? Is pointing out that the system is evil and racist an effective way to get non voters to vote? I don't see it.

We're in April. No chance we'd see a trial by August unless they jail him, and even then I don't think his attorney would want to rush into it unprepared.

But these arguments are irrelevant. I got a $20 bill that says there will never be a trial. And a $10 bill that says he's never even charged.



If this happens the Occupy movement will take up the slack.



So, you support vigilantism?



Hippies are usually quite peaceful. Flower Power and all that.



Well, what "slack" are the Occu-poopers going to "take up", then?



That'll be the 'white men get away with murdering black men with impunity' slack. Stock up with flowers now and join the revolution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
News reports are saying that the rally organizers in Sanford and Miami estimates of "tens of thousands" fell way short. Press interest has dropped way off.

I would think there would be a rally Tuesday when the grand jury is called???

Looking at my interest in all this. I really am intersted in the "truth" I'll be honest. I DIDN'T think the press handled this fairly toward Zimmerman BUT that doesn't make him innocent either
Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

News reports are saying that the rally organizers in Sanford and Miami estimates of "tens of thousands" fell way short. Press interest has dropped way off.

I would think there would be a rally Tuesday when the grand jury is called???

Looking at my interest in all this. I really am intersted in the "truth" I'll be honest. I DIDN'T think the press handled this fairly toward Zimmerman BUT that doesn't make him innocent either




+1
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

..... The 911 operator tells him to stop, and at some point (5 seconds? 30 seconds? later, he does).



And subsequently loses sight of Martin, thus ending that confrontation.


Quote

....Granted, when he stops chasing, presumably Martin recognizes it..




Quote

Of course his blood his up, adrenaline's still pumping, so cool, calm decisions are not his specialty at the moment. Instead, he switches from flight to fight...a mistake on his part that costs him his life.



So you admit that once Martin breaks the engagement by running, the further actions were all on his own hook?


Quote

However I also don't think his actions were completely innocent. He (Zimmerman) provoked the situation and helped escalate it to the point that violence broke out.



No - Martin did that when he circled back to confront Zimmerman.

Quote

In my opinion, the stand-your-ground principle went out the window when he started chasing the other guy.



Since you keep mis-characterizing SYG, allow me to add to your knowledge:
"A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony."

SYG doesn't come into play UNTIL violence is offered. Even had SYG *not* been passed, Zimmerman was justified in the use of deadly force since he had no way to further retreat; his back was literally "against the wall (ground)".




Some understand these things...some refuse to understand...for whatever reason.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Why do you refuse to acknowledge that Zimmerman chasing Martin was wrong and could very easily be considered a threat?


Nobody is saying that to my knowledge.



Quote

And how do you decide that there are two separate incidents?


See Mike's reply above...again.

Quote

*IF* Zimmerman lost sight of Martin, what makes you think Martin lost sight of Zimmerman?

Quote


Nobody said that either. Obviously, he found Z whether or not he ever lost sight of him.


Quote

Assuming you've been in that mode at some point in your life, you have to understand that you can't turn it off like that. As an adult it gets a bit easier, but it's still not a light switch, much less at 17.


It's your personal responsibility to do that.


Quote

If he didn't actually make a habit of trying to save the world from non-criminals, mea culpa.


And if he had? Does that make a difference? In my book it's commendable. More people should care enough.

Quote

It implies pretty clearly that Zimmerman did quit chasing Martin as directed by the 911 operator, but a couple minutes later Martin approached him, asked why he was following him, he denied it, but then chased him *again*, this time directly into the physical confrontation.


????
Directly into an ambush is more like it.
My reality and yours are quite different.
I think we're all Bozos on this bus.
Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It implies pretty clearly that Zimmerman did quit chasing Martin as directed by the 911 operator, but a couple minutes later Martin approached him, asked why he was following him, he denied it, but then chased him *again*, this time directly into the physical confrontation.


????
Directly into an ambush is more like it.



Eye of the beholder I suppose. Martin had just asked him "why are you following me?" And he said he was not. Martin took off again, and he chased him again. From Martin's perspective, the creepy dude who just denied following him is chasing him *again*. Turning to fight someone chasing you is not an ambush. If Zimmerman was truly not following Martin, as he just said, and as the 911 operator had instructed, he wouldn't have been at the location of the fight, and no altercation would have occurred.

Personally, I consider someone chasinghe me to be a threat. If Martin had shot Zimmerman at that point, it would have been almost as (un)justifiable.

Blues,
Dave
"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!"
(drink Mountain Dew)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

It implies pretty clearly that Zimmerman did quit chasing Martin as directed by the 911 operator, but a couple minutes later Martin approached him, asked why he was following him, he denied it, but then chased him *again*, this time directly into the physical confrontation.


????
Directly into an ambush is more like it.



Eye of the beholder I suppose. Martin had just asked him "why are you following me?" And he said he was not. Martin took off again, and he chased him again. From Martin's perspective, the creepy dude who just denied following him is chasing him *again*. Turning to fight someone chasing you is not an ambush. If Zimmerman was truly not following Martin, as he just said, and as the 911 operator had instructed, he wouldn't have been at the location of the fight, and no altercation would have occurred.

Personally, I consider someone chasinghe me to be a threat. If Martin had shot Zimmerman at that point, it would have been almost as (un)justifiable.

Blues,
Dave



Now another version of what happened!

Wow
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

It implies pretty clearly that Zimmerman did quit chasing Martin as directed by the 911 operator, but a couple minutes later Martin approached him, asked why he was following him, he denied it, but then chased him *again*, this time directly into the physical confrontation.


????
Directly into an ambush is more like it.



Eye of the beholder I suppose. Martin had just asked him "why are you following me?" And he said he was not. Martin took off again, and he chased him again. From Martin's perspective, the creepy dude who just denied following him is chasing him *again*. Turning to fight someone chasing you is not an ambush. If Zimmerman was truly not following Martin, as he just said, and as the 911 operator had instructed, he wouldn't have been at the location of the fight, and no altercation would have occurred.

Personally, I consider someone chasinghe me to be a threat. If Martin had shot Zimmerman at that point, it would have been almost as (un)justifiable.

Blues,
Dave




Or maybe Martin could have just gone to the house he was staying in and locked the door to get away from the creepy guy.
You can't be drunk all day if you don't start early!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>Or maybe Martin could have just gone to the house he was staying in and locked the
>door to get away from the creepy guy.

True. So could Zimmerman.



Also true. 2 people made bad decisions. 1 ended up dead. I am glad I live in Orange County and not Seminole. i would not like to be called for jury duty on this case.
You can't be drunk all day if you don't start early!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Or maybe Martin could have just gone to the house he was staying in and locked the door to get away from the creepy guy.



Because the first thing I want to do when some creepy dude is following me is show him where I live? Wasn't Zimmerman similarly reluctant? I know I have been (and the cops screwed me over and brought the guy I called the cops about to my front door...I moved the following week.)

Blues,
Dave
"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!"
(drink Mountain Dew)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Or maybe Martin could have just gone to the house he was staying in and locked the door to get away from the creepy guy.



Because the first thing I want to do when some creepy dude is following me is show him where I live?



Once 'creepy dude' loses sight of you, how are you leading him to your door? You going to stand outside waving lightsticks yelling "Over here, creepy dude!"?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Martin had just asked him "why are you following me?" And he said he was not. Martin took off again, and he chased him again. From Martin's perspective, the creepy dude who just denied following him is chasing him *again*.



Did I miss something? My understanding was that the only time they spoke was when T.M approached Z and ask something to the effect if "do you have a problem..." and the fight broke out.

Of course that can't be proved. So is the above just speculation that know one has suggested in either of the T.M or Zimmerman camps?
Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>It would be nearly impossible for Zimmerman to get a fair trial even if he is indicted.

Perhaps true. But as the gun advocates put it - "it is better to be judged by twelve than carried by six." Zimmerman made his choice.



I doubt when he made that choice he ever dreamed the Congress-critters and the President would enhance the possibility he can't get a fair trial. Since many of them are lawyers, I can't imagine what they were thinking when they spoke out so vociferiously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Of the seven calls placed by George Zimmerman, the man who shot Trayvon Martin, there were five where he reported suspicious-looking young men in the area -- but he never mentioned the men's race without first being asked. NBC's Michael Isikoff reports.



This is interesting, the fact that they took the effort to point out that he never mention the mans race without first being asked.

It seems the idea that Zimmerman was a racist is being slowly debunk.

Saw where Z family had written the NAACP in Sanford to ask they they stop making it sound like Z was a racist, Pushing back in hard terms.

They have also set up a web page for donations to offset his legal fees and to help pay bills as he can't work.

Be interesting to see if any Congressman come forward to give him money or support....LOL - that isn't going to happen.

Perhaps Obama will comment that Z could be his cousin....naaaa that won't happen.......
Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I doubt when he made that choice he ever dreamed the Congress-critters
>and the President would enhance the possibility he can't get a fair trial.

Probably not. Nor would Martin's family have ever dreamed that a "neighborhood watch" guy would end up killing their son as he returned from buying Skittles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I doubt when he made that choice he ever dreamed the Congress-critters
>and the President would enhance the possibility he can't get a fair trial.

Probably not. Nor would Martin's family have ever dreamed that a "neighborhood watch" guy would end up killing their son as he returned from buying Skittles.



Skittles being street slang for Ecstacy.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>I doubt when he made that choice he ever dreamed the Congress-critters
>and the President would enhance the possibility he can't get a fair trial.

Probably not. Nor would Martin's family have ever dreamed that a "neighborhood watch" guy would end up killing their son as he returned from buying Skittles.



Skittles being street slang for Ecstacy.

You have any proof of that?

Otherwise, that's an exceptionally contemptible comment, even considering the source.

Don
_____________________________________
Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996)
“Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0