DanG 1 #2176 June 14, 2012 Sorry, I'm done playing. This has gotten boring. Everyone who was alive at the time knows the lies that got him in trouble related to his relationship with Lewinski. It's really not in dispute. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #2177 June 14, 2012 QuoteSorry, I'm done playing. This has gotten boring. snort. checkmate, then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #2178 June 14, 2012 Yes, you have defeated my with your superior pedantry. Tally ho. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #2179 June 14, 2012 oh, I thought you were done with the thread? If you can respond to that post, surely you could answer my simple question, then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2180 June 14, 2012 Quote Sorry, I'm done playing. This has gotten boring. Everyone who was alive at the time knows the lies that got him in trouble related to his relationship with Lewinski. It's really not in dispute. You are smart enough to stop diggingAND It is getting tiring because you are getting your ass kicked The case was about his harassment of women In the end, what he lied about is irrelevant and your perspective is dishonest at best"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #2181 June 14, 2012 Quote Quote Sorry, I'm done playing. This has gotten boring. Everyone who was alive at the time knows the lies that got him in trouble related to his relationship with Lewinski. It's really not in dispute. You are smart enough to stop diggingAND It is getting tiring because you are getting your ass kicked The case was about his harassment of women In the end, what he lied about is irrelevant and your perspective is dishonest at best You are not smart enough to shut up in due time. You forgot to ask the international media, Marc. What they published all over the world was NOT what you said. Scrubby, buddy, really scrubby. dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 102 #2182 June 14, 2012 QuoteWhat they published all over the world was NOT what you said. The case was a sexual harassment case (a very severe one at that), and the ML affair was relevant because the affair with an intern made him look guilty in the harassment of PJ. Just because much of the international media misreported things doesn't change what the PJ case was about, and why Clinton was testifying about the ML affair as part of the PJ case.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #2183 June 14, 2012 Your one warning. Don't tell people to "shut up." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #2184 June 14, 2012 Quote You forgot to ask the international media, Marc. What they published all over the world was NOT what you said. European morals around marital fidelity are much weaker than US ones. And it seems it's true for workplace harassment as well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #2185 June 14, 2012 RushMC comes out swinging: >Lied about a bj? You have no idea what you are taking about . . . >Clinton perjured himself during testimony before a grand jury . . . >The lie was about a sexual harrasment case. . . . Then RushMC realizes he's screwed up and is getting taken to school on the subject. The very next post: >In the end, what he lied about is irrelevant . . . Now that's some fine entertainment right there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2186 June 15, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Sorry, I'm done playing. This has gotten boring. Everyone who was alive at the time knows the lies that got him in trouble related to his relationship with Lewinski. It's really not in dispute. You are smart enough to stop diggingAND It is getting tiring because you are getting your ass kicked The case was about his harassment of women In the end, what he lied about is irrelevant and your perspective is dishonest at best You are not smart enough to shut up in due time. You forgot to ask the international media, Marc. What they published all over the world was NOT what you said. Scrubby, buddy, really scrubby. I am not smart enough........ Fucking brilliant I stand beat down I really love you as a stalker "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2187 June 15, 2012 Quote RushMC comes out swinging: >Lied about a bj? You have no idea what you are taking about . . . >Clinton perjured himself during testimony before a grand jury . . . >The lie was about a sexual harrasment case. . . . Then RushMC realizes he's screwed up and is getting taken to school on the subject. The very next post: >In the end, what he lied about is irrelevant . . . Now that's some fine entertainment right there. comes out swinging? No, that gets one banned here Taken to school? You hope "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2188 June 15, 2012 Quote Your one warning. Don't tell people to "shut up." You cant say shut up but telling someone they are not smart enough gets a pass Not that I am surprised you know"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #2189 June 15, 2012 Quote RushMC comes out swinging: >Lied about a bj? You have no idea what you are taking about . . . >Clinton perjured himself during testimony before a grand jury . . . >The lie was about a sexual harrasment case. . . . Then RushMC realizes he's screwed up and is getting taken to school on the subject. The very next post: >In the end, what he lied about is irrelevant . . . Now that's some fine entertainment right there. Yet, to a certain extent, true. The BJ was simply the icing on the cake (sorry). What "it" was about was the Republicans doing everything they could on all possible fronts to make the President look bad. If it wasn't a BJ, it was going to be about something else as long as they kept digging hard enough and pressing uncomfortable issues and putting the man under oath so they could press him harder and maybe he'd slip up and then they'd "have" him for "something" proving he was "evil" and by extension the Republicans the only "right" direction for the country. Not that this is what Rush meant . . . but he was, in fact, inadvertently correct.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 348 #2190 June 15, 2012 Z is still a douchebag - and so's his wife.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #2191 June 15, 2012 Quote The BJ was simply the icing on the cake (sorry). Phrasing! Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #2192 June 15, 2012 Quote That was one of the topics where he fucked himself He needed only tell the truth and it would have been over I am full of it alright "It" = Truth It he had just fucked himself he would have stayed out of trouble."What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skypuppy 1 #2193 June 15, 2012 He got in trouble because he made a play for a subordinate, in this case PJ, and he got caught. and with ML. How many others did he get away with? Model employer.If some old guy can do it then obviously it can't be very extreme. Otherwise he'd already be dead. Bruce McConkey 'I thought we were gonna die, and I couldn't think of anyone Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 800 #2194 June 15, 2012 WTH are you talking about?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
linebckr83 3 #2195 June 15, 2012 I don't care if he lied about the snack he ate for lunch. As Commander in Chief, and President of the United States, he is held to a higher level and expected to NOT lie to the very people he swore to protect. How is this related to a thug in florida getting shot? Who knows but apparently its relevant. "Are you coming to the party? Oh I'm coming, but I won't be there!" Flying Hellfish #828 Dudist #52 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #2196 June 15, 2012 Quote As Commander in Chief, and President of the United States, he is held to a higher level and expected to NOT lie to the very people he swore to protect. I don't consider not lying to be "higher standard". I don't care if it's the POTUS, or just anybody I associate with. When we consider honesty to be a special and noble character trait only reserved for our leaders, then we really are in deep shit. We don't live in aristocracy. There shouldn't be higher and lower standards of character. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #2197 June 15, 2012 Quote I don't care if he lied about the snack he ate for lunch. As Commander in Chief, and President of the United States, he is held to a higher level and expected to NOT lie to the very people he swore to protect. How is this related to a thug in florida getting shot? Who knows but apparently its relevant. Perhaps, you should judge a man's life more than just beeing a "thug" without any proof. How do you know he was a thug?? A CiC, a prez ... = "... held to a higher level"? My as* You're a jester, right? dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #2198 June 15, 2012 Quote Perhaps, you should judge a man's life more than just beeing a "thug" without any proof. How do you know he was a thug?? Well, he wasn't a model student, that much is rather clear. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #2199 June 15, 2012 Quote Quote Perhaps, you should judge a man's life more than just beeing a "thug" without any proof. How do you know he was a thug?? Well, he wasn't a model student, that much is rather clear. Is it? And that means what, again? dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #2200 June 15, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Perhaps, you should judge a man's life more than just beeing a "thug" without any proof. How do you know he was a thug?? Well, he wasn't a model student, that much is rather clear. Is it? And that means what, again? dunno about you, but I wasn't suspended from my high school once, nevermind three times. Thug is a loaded word, but definitely not someone I want my children associating with. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites