0
jclalor

Florida Teen Shot

Recommended Posts

Quote


I like this bit:

"Martin was visiting his father's fiancee, who lived there. He had been suspended from school in Miami after being found with an empty marijuana baggie. Miami schools have a zero-tolerance policy for drug possession."

I guess "zero tolerance" means you have no marijuana, just an empty bag.



the precise details are that there were trace amounts, which begs the question of why it was described as "empty." This apparently is the 3rd suspension for the young man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Fact is, the investigation was bungled from the very start.

A month after the event has given so-called "eyewitnesses" plenty of time to collaborate in fabricating a consistent story in support of their guy (whichever guy that was).



If someone is predisposed to belief this was an assassination, there's really no winning. Then you can't believe the cops did their job, or that these witnesses exist. And since there is now a black acting police chief, you have to believe he's part of it too, either because he's an angry Uncle Tom, or adhering to a very broad code blue.

now do you see any point to investigating it at this point - will you believe anything that leads to an exoneration of the shooter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Some years back I remember some commentator somewhere state that blacks are going to have to work harder to maintain their number one persecuted minority status because Hispanics and Latinos were growing rapidly and taking over the slot.

People earn a living studying and predicting social phenomena, trends, injustices and the like. They are probably drafting federal grant proposals as we speak.

Sharpton, the first on the scene, and Jackson exacerbate these unfortunate incidents. I believe they do it for personal gain. As the saying goes, "Never let a good crisis go to waste."

I have no opinion until after the grand jury finding.



Gotta love the fox news signature move of when you want to say something really racist, simply start with "some people say", or "i once heard from some commentator..." :)

Mine was a first person statement of fact for consideration. It was not racist.

I stand by my belief that Sharpton and Jackson perpetuate racial tension for personal gain.

We just had two trials here in my area where 1) a 17 YO black male shot and killed two British tourists for being in the wrong neighborhood and 2) a 17 YO black male shot and killed a police officer that stopped him and asked for ID.

Where were Sharpton and Jackson on these incidents?

No where to be found. They only show up to further the cause of racial tension, increase personal exposure and profit.

You can research the trials. Both were in the last month or six weeks. The first was in Bradenton FL and the second in St. Petersburg FL.
Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Might as well make a few bucks off your dead child. Perhaps this will help with the greiving process.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/trayvon-martin-trademarks-769123

Quote

MARCH 26--The mother of Trayvon Martin has filed two applications to secure trademarks containing her late son’s name, records show.

Sybrina Fulton is seeking marks for the phrases “I Am Trayvon” and “Justice for Trayvon,” according to filings made last week with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In both instances, Fulton, 46, is seeking the trademarks for use on “Digital materials, namely, CDs and DVDs featuring Trayvon Martin,” and other products.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


I like this bit:

"Martin was visiting his father's fiancee, who lived there. He had been suspended from school in Miami after being found with an empty marijuana baggie. Miami schools have a zero-tolerance policy for drug possession."

I guess "zero tolerance" means you have no marijuana, just an empty bag.



the precise details are that there were trace amounts, which begs the question of why it was described as "empty." This apparently is the 3rd suspension for the young man.



I believe that a careful analysis of the bills in your wallet at any given time is very likely to show trace amounts of cocaine. Doesn't prove you snort the stuff.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Fact is, the investigation was bungled from the very start.

A month after the event has given so-called "eyewitnesses" plenty of time to collaborate in fabricating a consistent story in support of their guy (whichever guy that was).



If someone is predisposed to belief this was an assassination, there's really no winning. Then you can't believe the cops did their job, or that these witnesses exist. And since there is now a black acting police chief, you have to believe he's part of it too, either because he's an angry Uncle Tom, or adhering to a very broad code blue.

now do you see any point to investigating it at this point - will you believe anything that leads to an exoneration of the shooter?



I'm not sure I believe anything about the event except that the kid, armed only with groceries, was shot dead.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not sure I believe anything about the event except that the kid, armed only with groceries, was shot dead.



Yeah the groceries and the intent to cause great bodily harm....



According to what Zimmerman told local officers, he lost sight of the teen and was returning to his SUV when Martin approached him and they exchanged words. He said Martin asked if he had a problem, Zimmerman replied no and reached for his cell phone. He then alleges that Martin said "well you do now" and punched him in the nose.


Zimmerman said he then fell to the ground and Martin got on top of him and began slamming his head into the sidewalk. Zimmerman said he began yelling for help.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/26/trayvon-martin-case-georg_n_1381322.html?1332811474&ncid=webmail1










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True facts; guilt nor innocence no longer matters in this country. What does matter is political correctness.

"God" help us all for what will become of us.....
"Better to have a short life that is full of what you like doing, than a long life spent in a miserable way." - Alan Watts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I will go with them at this time rather than your biased already convicted opinion



Once again, you are inventing the existence of eyewitness reports that exonerate him and pretending they have been reported in the press, I am simply asking to see them.

Your decision has clearly already been made.

Quote

Oh
and the stories are there



No, they're not. Not the ones that show the reports I'm asking for. If they were, you would have been able to link to one, and so would Mike.

Now, Mike is admitting he was mistaken, so why are you still holding out?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How else could Zimmerman confront Martin if he wasn't able to outrun him, since he had to leave his truck?



You make the presumption that Martin was running away as fast as he could as soon as Zimmerman left his truck. We know this isn't true.

Quote

Yes, Jake - I misread the statement and thought it mentioned the start of the fight.



So you knew you were flat wrong on the one specific issue I was asking about, and yet you had the gall to accuse me of word games at the start of your last post? Why is it impossible to have a straight discussion with you without any of that bullshit creeping in?

Quote

Given that information, how *else* would the confrontation have taken place, absent Martin returning to the scene?



Billvon has given several scenarios. But that would presume you'd read the thread.

Quote

Given that Zimmerman knew that the police were mere moments away, why would *Zimmerman* attack Martin?



Why did he follow him in the first place? He's got a history of being aggressive and confrontational and after chasing him in the first place, it wouldn't take much for Zimmerman to put Martin in genuine fear of his own safety.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Still waiting on your "plausable reasons".



Yes, you are. So how do you know they're whimsical? You must be going for some kind of contradiction record.

But seriously, can you think of no way that an unarmed man can threaten another unarmed man? Just a yes or a no. You can do it.


How many invitations do you need...


OK. Agrown man has just been following a teenager at night for no reason, grabs him by the arm and wont let go, while aggressively asking who the fuck he is and what the fuck he's doing, and threatening to kick his ass if he's a) a punk and b) if he tries to leave. That is but one of the things that would make me feel quite threatened if I was in the teenager's position.

Were you able to think of that? No? Then... :D:D:D:D:D
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

the precise details are that there were trace amounts, which begs the question of why it was described as "empty."



When my orange juice carton has only trace amounts of orange juice left on the sides I describe it as empty. Same with my car's gas tank. And, y'know, pretty much everything.

Quote

This apparently is the 3rd suspension for the young man.



For marijuana? So what?

I thought the days of 'reefer madness' were rightfully dead and buried.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



Some years back I remember some commentator somewhere state that blacks are going to have to work harder to maintain their number one persecuted minority status because Hispanics and Latinos were growing rapidly and taking over the slot.

People earn a living studying and predicting social phenomena, trends, injustices and the like. They are probably drafting federal grant proposals as we speak.

Sharpton, the first on the scene, and Jackson exacerbate these unfortunate incidents. I believe they do it for personal gain. As the saying goes, "Never let a good crisis go to waste."

I have no opinion until after the grand jury finding.



Gotta love the fox news signature move of when you want to say something really racist, simply start with "some people say", or "i once heard from some commentator..." :)


Mine was a first person statement of fact for consideration. It was not racist.


That commentator was being racist - and Stupid. Glad you don't agree with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


now do you see any point to investigating it at this point - will you believe anything that leads to an exoneration of the shooter?



The easy answer is NO. I've read every thread here. Basically one group is just SURE that Zimmerman did it. There story has modifiyed somewhat but the facts are coming out.

The overiding fact is that a young boy is dead, and that is terrible - but other facts are coming out. Zimmerman was a fool, but Martain wasn't the perfect little kid either.

I find it interesting the pictures that are being used of Zimmerman and Martin. Ebe terrible, terrible Fox uses the picture of Zimmerman that makes him look like a thug and the sweet young picture of Martin.

Interesting.
Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



I'm not sure I believe anything about the event except that the kid, armed only with groceries, was shot dead.



Yeah the groceries and the intent to cause great bodily harm....



According to what Zimmerman told local officers, he lost sight of the teen and was returning to his SUV when Martin approached him and they exchanged words. He said Martin asked if he had a problem, Zimmerman replied no and reached for his cell phone. He then alleges that Martin said "well you do now" and punched him in the nose.


Zimmerman said he then fell to the ground and Martin got on top of him and began slamming his head into the sidewalk. Zimmerman said he began yelling for help.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/26/trayvon-martin-case-georg_n_1381322.html?1332811474&ncid=webmail1



That's just his story, not a proven fact.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

"If the eyewitness reports are true, Martin closed on Zimmerman and knocked him to the ground, initiating the attack."



Except that there are no eye witness reports regarding that. Eye witnesses were attracted by cries for help, those didn't start until after the fight started.

There is confusion amongst eye witnesses who was on top of whom. The one eye witness who has gone to the media has been described in reports as a friend of Zimemrman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Might as well make a few bucks off your dead child. Perhaps this will help with the greiving process.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/trayvon-martin-trademarks-769123

Quote

MARCH 26--The mother of Trayvon Martin has filed two applications to secure trademarks containing her late son’s name, records show.

Sybrina Fulton is seeking marks for the phrases “I Am Trayvon” and “Justice for Trayvon,” according to filings made last week with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In both instances, Fulton, 46, is seeking the trademarks for use on “Digital materials, namely, CDs and DVDs featuring Trayvon Martin,” and other products.



That also prevents other people from making money of her dead child. But you wouldn't look at it from that side, would you....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



I'm not sure I believe anything about the event except that the kid, armed only with groceries, was shot dead.



Yeah the groceries and the intent to cause great bodily harm....



According to what Zimmerman told local officers, he lost sight of the teen and was returning to his SUV when Martin approached him and they exchanged words. He said Martin asked if he had a problem, Zimmerman replied no and reached for his cell phone. He then alleges that Martin said "well you do now" and punched him in the nose.


Zimmerman said he then fell to the ground and Martin got on top of him and began slamming his head into the sidewalk. Zimmerman said he began yelling for help.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/26/trayvon-martin-case-georg_n_1381322.html?1332811474&ncid=webmail1



That's just his story, not a proven fact.



Absolutely...as is the OTHER side of the story.

But~ his dad says it didn't sound like the kid's voice crying out for help...HIS DAD. (fact)

Zimmerman says it was he himself yelling for help. (fact)

Zimmerman has a bloody nose and a busted up back of the head. (fact)


Zimmerman 'says' he was attacked...do we NOT believe him because there may be rioting in the streets?

Many seem to be saying Zimmerman alone was overly aggressive, yet the FACT the teen has shown aggressive behavior as well in the past is to be ignored because there may be rioting in the streets?

I'm not saying any of this is good, right or justifiable...just that the portrayal of some innocent little child with a pocket full of skittles being ruthlessly gunned down because he was wearing a hoodie is NOT the facts of what's going on here.

Ya got a wannabe gangsta playing tough guy to some self proclaimed Lone Ranger ~ the perfect storm for this to happen. Color is inconsequential, or it 'should' be if we want justice...let it play out and the ACTUAL facts be presented.

~ the fear of another LA riot has kept this top news for a month now, there was a rally in downtown Houston two nights ago...1/2 the people misspelled the kids name of their hoodies of protest. Either they didn't wanna pay his MOTHER trademark fees, or they really don't have a clue and just want to do as you're doing. Make a 'statement' without taking the time to get the FACTS right.

Tragic situation to be sure, but everyone ~ yourself included Doc, are making critical judgements on speculative hype.

That does nothing but play right into what the racist 'Calvary' wants...play the hand wringing emotion card and try to trump the logic hand.




IF ya wanna speculate, lets take the gun out of the equation for a minute and make them both GREEN...

The 'story' as we know it so far green older neighborhood watch guy sees what he believes to be suspicious activity so he follows green kid to see what he's up to.
Green kid doesn't like that and attacks older guy doing physical harm...WHO is breaking the LAW again?

OK, throw the gun back in there and the kid turns blue...since it's been established that the older green guy was within the law to carry a weapon and protect himself...there can be no arrest.

SOMEHOW when ya throw the color back in there you have a unending news story designed to create unrest...and all kinds of people with unrelated agendas seize that and get the emotional masses to drink the kool aid...WTF?










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Killers have shown time after time that they can lie to cover their tracks. They can even get their friends to give them alibis.



So you are the judge and jury and the case is closed:S


Very open minded of you
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Killers have shown time after time that they can lie to cover their tracks. They can even get their friends to give them alibis.



Yup...

And vocal Black leaders have shown time after time that they can turn non existent prejudice into profit by utilizing mis-information as a tool to create unrest and/or twist justice. Read O.J.'s book...even HE says so. :ph34r:;)

What's your point?

Is there really a problem with letting the FACTS play out here?

~put down the Kool Aid and think with your head not your emotions that are being played by pros...question EVERYTHING sure, to blindly believe what you're being told by someone with an agenda is ludicrous.


That kind of mentality can end up having ya killing a few million Jews, or wearing purple sneakers and eating poison to catch a ride on a spaceship...or making those around you drinking even MORE suicidal Kool Aid :S

WHENEVER I see someone trying to create a pack mentality...I step back and look for motivation in doing that, don't have to look real hard on this one.










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Is there really a problem with letting the FACTS play out here?



Unfortunately I think it is likely that the facts will never all be known. Makes it a bit of a Roschach test, I think. We know Zimmermann got out of his vehicle and followed the dude at some point, we know there was a scuffle at some point (and apparently Z was getting the worst of that), we know that Zimmerman shot Martin. Between those things there is a lot of fill-in-the-blank going on.

I have a question for the attorneys, though. My belief was that self-defense in a case like this was an affirmative defense, which would shift the burden to Zimmerman to establish certain elements of his defense. Is that correct? Of does the prosecution have to estbalish that Zimmerman was "not" in fear of his life?
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Trolls have shown time after time that they can post to get a rise out of people. They can even get other posters to respond to them.



Don't feed the race baiting trolls.
"The restraining order says you're only allowed to touch me in freefall"
=P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Is there really a problem with letting the FACTS play out here?



Not at all.

Isn't anybody concerned this may not have happened the first time around?

(Never mind the larger issue that race relations are still extremely poor for this outcry to occur)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Basically one group is just SURE that Zimmerman did it.

There's no question that he shot the kid.

The question is - is he guilty of murder or manslaughter? One group is positive he is guilty, and killed him because he hated blacks; one is positive he is a completely innocent guy who heroically defended himself against a deadly threat. The truth is almost certainly between those two extremes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0