Recommended Posts
Shotgun 1
QuoteThe best argument I hear atheists using to defend "almighty evolution" as the creator and designer of the universe is ," I don't believe in any gods so therefore evolution must be the god of the gaps in explaining how we got here"
People claim evolution as "the creator and designer of the universe"? I don't think I've ever heard that.
maadmax 0
--Sure there is.
--Simpler to more complex structures - crystallography, metallurgy, geology, chemistry. Plenty of examples there.
--Self-replicating molecules - chemistry. Scripps just demonstrated how very simple organic molecules can replicate forever.
I have to disagree, You are describing simple chemistry and physics, not mutation & natural selection leading to sentient life
--Simpler to more complex structures - crystallography, metallurgy, geology, chemistry. Plenty of examples there.
--Self-replicating molecules - chemistry. Scripps just demonstrated how very simple organic molecules can replicate forever.
I have to disagree, You are describing simple chemistry and physics, not mutation & natural selection leading to sentient life
--More complex life - biology. There are plenty of examples of complex structures (powered flagella, wings, eyes) that evolved from simpler ones (osmotic pumps, arms, light sensitive patches.)
OK, no disagreement, that is obviously evolution. Which in essence is a force acting on disordered matter and energy to produce an ordered more complex state.
--"God of the gaps" is actually the opposite argument, that anything unexplained by science must have been engineered by God.
that is why I said "god of the gaps" its the atheists explanation of the basic questions of origin and meaning using evolution in place of God.
...
billvon 3,008
>I have to disagree, You are describing simple chemistry and physics, not mutation &
>natural selection leading to sentient life
Yes. That wasn't meant to demonstrate how life began - just a few examples to demonstrate how random matter can spontaneously combine to produce more complex matter.
>that is why I said "god of the gaps" its the atheists explanation of the basic questions
>of origin and meaning using evolution in place of God.
But it means the opposite of what you said. It's like saying "I can prove there is no God because there is evidence that Zeus exists."
>natural selection leading to sentient life
Yes. That wasn't meant to demonstrate how life began - just a few examples to demonstrate how random matter can spontaneously combine to produce more complex matter.
>that is why I said "god of the gaps" its the atheists explanation of the basic questions
>of origin and meaning using evolution in place of God.
But it means the opposite of what you said. It's like saying "I can prove there is no God because there is evidence that Zeus exists."
maadmax 0
People claim evolution as "the creator and designer of the universe"? I don't think I've ever heard that.
That is the explanation I have heard over and over explaining how we and everything else got here. Which of course is based on an extrapolated observation of events occurring on the earth over a limited period of time. In a different setting confidence put in such theories would be called faith.
maadmax 0
--Yes. That wasn't meant to demonstrate how life began - just a few examples to demonstrate how random matter can spontaneously combine to produce more complex matter.
Negative, your examples can go in both directions without degradation to the specimen. That is not life or evolution.
Negative, your examples can go in both directions without degradation to the specimen. That is not life or evolution.
--But it means the opposite of what you said. It's like saying "I can prove there is no God because there is evidence that Zeus exists.
I don't follow your statement, the phrase "god of the gaps" refers to phenomena being explained by unprovable events. Which can apply equally to creation originating from God or evolution.
...
Coreece 190
QuoteQuoteYou'd think that if the "evolutionists" here actually cared they have more to say about something so tangible other than appeals to ridicule and complexity, i.e., "you're too stupid to understand."
If that's all you've ever taken away from the many, many information filled posts on the subject here then sorry, but it sounds like you are.
I was talking to beowulf...how many of those information filled posts were his?
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...
>our existence and why we are here.
Definitely agreed. All evolution does is show us how, physically, we evolved from lower organisms. It doesn't answer any philosophical questions about the meaning of our existence.
>There is no area in the fundamental sciences that can produce a postulate explaining
>how random matter and energy will spontaneously combine to produce ever more
>complex life forms.
Sure there is.
Simpler to more complex structures - crystallography, metallurgy, geology, chemistry. Plenty of examples there.
Self-replicating molecules - chemistry. Scripps just demonstrated how very simple organic molecules can replicate forever.
More complex life - biology. There are plenty of examples of complex structures (powered flagella, wings, eyes) that evolved from simpler ones (osmotic pumps, arms, light sensitive patches.)
>" I don't believe in any gods so therefore evolution must be the god of the gaps in
>explaining how we got here"
"God of the gaps" is actually the opposite argument, that anything unexplained by science must have been engineered by God.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites