0
piisfish

massive shooting at Batman projection...

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

nuts



+1, a senseless tragedy.



And regardless of this person’s religious or political leanings, in the end, he is just disturbed.....

Period.....



Right, we need to do a FAR BETTER JOB keeping guns out of the hands of nutcases.

Good job all those CCW holders were around to prevent this.



Ah yes

The circluar argument of the gun banner comes up early in the thread

Until you can be honest about your position on guns, why don't you just read and learn something

Bye



I am honest - I want it to be far more difficult for **nutcases** to get guns. If you think this will impact you, then the rest of us can draw our own conclusions about your own opinion of yourself.



What will be the measurement?

The Mom "knew", in the linked article, so what was she to do? what are the laws for her to help protect society?

How far do you want the laws to be able to reach?

Matt



He gave an honest answer to your quesion once years ago

His proposals amounted to massive government intrusions on our 2nd Amendment rights at best, but would better be described as an outright gun ban

He will not give an honest answer again here IMO.

You will just get his circular argument over and over again



Incorrect and the same lie you have repeated over and over again. Whenever called on it you can't find anything I wrote to back up your lie.

Keeping guns out of the hands of nutcases and felons is not an infringement of the 2nd Amendment. SCOTUS has already made that clear.

We just do a rather piss poor job of it at the moment.

If you think it will affect you personally, what does that say about you?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

nuts



+1, a senseless tragedy.



And regardless of this person’s religious or political leanings, in the end, he is just disturbed.....

Period.....



Right, we need to do a FAR BETTER JOB keeping guns out of the hands of nutcases.

Good job all those CCW holders were around to prevent this.



Ah yes

The circluar argument of the gun banner comes up early in the thread

Until you can be honest about your position on guns, why don't you just read and learn something

Bye



I am honest - I want it to be far more difficult for **nutcases** to get guns. If you think this will impact you, then the rest of us can draw our own conclusions about your own opinion of yourself.



What will be the measurement?

The Mom "knew", in the linked article, so what was she to do? what are the laws for her to help protect society?

How far do you want the laws to be able to reach?

Matt



He gave an honest answer to your quesion once years ago

His proposals amounted to massive government intrusions on our 2nd Amendment rights at best, but would better be described as an outright gun ban

He will not give an honest answer again here IMO.

You will just get his circular argument over and over again



Incorrect and the same lie you have repeated over and over again. Whenever called on it you can't find anything I wrote to back up your lie.

Keeping guns out of the hands of nutcases and felons is not an infringement of the 2nd Amendment. SCOTUS has already made that clear.

We just do a rather piss poor job of it at the moment.

If you think it will affect you personally, what does that say about you?




...quack, quack....
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Alrighty then... So much for a "temporary insanity" defense then.



Lawrocket or Andy would probably know better but, does the insanity defense basically mean that the defendant does not know right from wrong essentially?

I ask cause there is little doubt the guy is a nut



Thank you for acknowledging that. Yes, he was a nut with a gun.

We should probably do something to prevent nuts from having access to guns.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Alrighty then... So much for a "temporary insanity" defense then.



Lawrocket or Andy would probably know better but, does the insanity defense basically mean that the defendant does not know right from wrong essentially?

I ask cause there is little doubt the guy is a nut



Thank you for acknowledging that. Yes, he was a nut with a gun.

We should probably do something to prevent nuts from having access to guns.



Ah, you are now going to join the nutter with a gun but no real solution crowd

Got it
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

So how do we prevent these incidents from happening? What drives people to do this in such a premeditated fashion?

Is this just the price of the 2nd Amendment?

Are people ok with that price?



Never will

How do we stop drunk drivers from killing people

How do we stop skydivers from doing HP landing and killing themselves?

How do stop people from stepping into traffic?

Best we can ever do is minimize

Total elimination is impossible


(now dont that that as then we should not ever try comment from me)
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

h, you are now going to join the nutter with a gun but no real solution crowd

Got it



No, I don't think Kallend as going to join the Republican party any time soon.



Hmmm, it has nothing to do with party IMO
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Apparently we compare dicks and guns.

HOW do you identify the nuts before they snap?
Isn't that the real challenge?
Seems rather impossible.
Remove the guns? They'll pick another weapon.
We can't eliminate every deadly item or ones that can be used as such.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Alrighty then... So much for a "temporary insanity" defense then.



Accept, already we have "speculators" claiming he had PTSD, I have yet to read or hear any thing stating he did, or had served in a venue to suffer from PTSD.

Matt
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Apparently we compare dicks and guns.

HOW do you identify the nuts before they snap?
Isn't that the real challenge?
Seems rather impossible.
Remove the guns? They'll pick another weapon.
We can't eliminate every deadly item or ones that can be used as such.



So it is just the price of the 2nd Amendment?

Other countries appear to have less of an incident rate of these pre-meditated mass shootings. Is it really impossible that the easy availability of guns has no impact on this?

Quote

We can't eliminate ....



No shit Sherlock...

As always the question is how to reduce and if the price of reduction is worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

News just said one victim being treated is 3 months old.



WTF? Why was a parent taking their 3mo old to a midnight showing of a movie? That infant should have been home in their crib!



seriously (and this was even later, I heard it was a 2nd or 3rd run)

For that matter - why take a 3 month old to a Batman movie in the first place? regardless of time of day

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Apparently we compare dicks and guns.

HOW do you identify the nuts before they snap?
Isn't that the real challenge?
Seems rather impossible.
Remove the guns? They'll pick another weapon.
We can't eliminate every deadly item or ones that can be used as such.



So it is just the price of the 2nd Amendment?

Other countries appear to have less of an incident rate of these pre-meditated mass shootings. Is it really impossible that the easy availability of guns has no impact on this?

Quote

We can't eliminate ....



No shit Sherlock...

As always the question is how to reduce and if the price of reduction is worth it.


I am going to randomly try to demonize something as well. I say stop all the violence in the movies. Kids are and nut jobs are being influenced by these movies and.... video games... yes video games. Ban all violence in movies and in video games. They are the cause... they make people nuts! :S

Evil or bad exists in the world no matter what you do. It's not hard to build a homemade bomb. No guns just do that. Guns are not the problem... people are the problem and there is not much we can do about that. Things like this have happened since the dawn of time even before guns came around.
Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it.
Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000
www.fundraiseadventure.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Alrighty then... So much for a "temporary insanity" defense then.



Lawrocket or Andy would probably know better but, does the insanity defense basically mean that the defendant does not know right from wrong essentially?

I ask cause there is little doubt the guy is a nut



Thank you for acknowledging that. Yes, he was a nut with a gun.

We should probably do something to prevent nuts from having access to guns.



What would you suggest we do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

News just said one victim being treated is 3 months old.



WTF? Why was a parent taking their 3mo old to a midnight showing of a movie? That infant should have been home in their crib!

parent>


seriously (and this was even later, I heard it was a 2nd or 3rd run)

For that matter - why take a 3 month old to a Batman movie in the first place? regardless of time of day


Have you ever tried to get a babysitter at midnight on a week night? :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Alrighty then... So much for a "temporary insanity" defense then.



Accept, already we have "speculators" claiming he had PTSD, I have yet to read or hear any thing stating he did, or had served in a venue to suffer from PTSD.

Matt



ABC is trying to link this to the Tea Party now

Must have gotten a note from some one here on SC
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Have you ever tried to get a babysitter at midnight on a week night? :S



nope, I stay home with my kid and see the movie later

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0