billvon 3,118 #426 July 24, 2012 >The 'gun show loophole' is when Bob sets up a table at a gunshow to sell >beef jerky and wants to sell his personal weapon he no longer needs. He >is not in the business to feel that one gun, he is in the business to sell >jerky and wants to sell his personal weapon since he knows a bunch of >buyers will be there. It is NO different than him putting an ad in the local >paper and selling his personal weapon to you at his house. Right - but it is still selling a gun at a gun show. I make a lot of beer. I give some of it away. If I ever tried to sell it I'd be lucky to avoid fines and/or getting arrested - because it's illegal to sell alcohol without a license, and it's illegal to make it for sale without following all the requirements for operating a business, making a food product, labeling the beer appropriately etc. And that would be true whether I tried to open a bar, rolled a keg into a gun show and sold it for $1 a cup or even just put out a few "personal bottles" I wanted to sell. And believe me people try - many homebrewer meetings have hours-long discussions over dodges like "OK, if I just sell T-shirts and give people a free beer for buying a shirt, isn't that OK?" And the answer is always no. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense that gun laws should be more lax than beer laws, with even more ways to get around them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #427 July 24, 2012 QuoteRight - but it is still selling a gun at a gun show. But by law it is no different than selling a personal weapon in my house. QuoteI make a lot of beer. I give some of it away. If I ever tried to sell it I'd be lucky to avoid fines and/or getting arrested - because it's illegal to sell alcohol without a license It is also illegal to sell guns without a license. But it is NOT illegal to sell a personally owned gun without a license. QuoteIt doesn't make a whole lot of sense that gun laws should be more lax than beer laws, with even more ways to get around them. Then maybe the beer laws should be more like gun laws? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #428 July 24, 2012 QuoteBut by law it is no different than selling a personal weapon in my house. I think you missed Bill's point that by law it is illegal to sell beer in your house. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #429 July 24, 2012 QuoteQuoteBut by law it is no different than selling a personal weapon in my house. I think you missed Bill's point that by law it is illegal to sell beer in your house. Here's a story problem... I bought a case of beer the other night for $18...I gave half to my uncle and he gave me $9. How long will it take for the ATF to raid my house?Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #430 July 24, 2012 QuoteQuoteBut by law it is no different than selling a personal weapon in my house. I think you missed Bill's point that by law it is illegal to sell beer in your house. alcohol has regulations around it that are just as uptight as gun sales. Add in Prohibition and various blues laws and the hunger for taxes and it's quite a mess. If you overbuy for a party (or wedding), you can't return the excess...that would make you a distributor. Though somehow people are able to sell wine, either on consignment or directly. Wonder how legal that is. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #431 July 24, 2012 QuoteI bought a case of beer the other night for $18...I gave half to my uncle and he gave me $9. How long will it take for the ATF to raid my house? part 2 - How do you think the rainforests FEEL about dying so that grain can be grown for corporate liquor sales? Please note your preferences. Spelling is not important if you try hard. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muff528 3 #432 July 24, 2012 Quote Quote Quote But by law it is no different than selling a personal weapon in my house. I think you missed Bill's point that by law it is illegal to sell beer in your house. alcohol has regulations around it that are just as uptight as gun sales. Add in Prohibition and various blues laws and the hunger for taxes and it's quite a mess. If you overbuy for a party (or wedding), you can't return the excess...that would make you a distributor. Though somehow people are able to sell wine, either on consignment or directly. Wonder how legal that is. I always thought it was strange that in my county you cannot buy liquor on Sunday and take it home to drink in the safety of your house (only beer and wine). But you can go to a bar for a few hours, drinking any kind of drink you want, and then drive home shitfaced. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #433 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuote there are two major hold ups to fixing what is called the loophole 1 the NICS system runs on a small staff on weekends. Weekends are when most gun shows are held. Those wanting to fix the loopholes do not want to fix the NICS issue {/reply] I thought it was all a computerized database? Do you mean it is not and there is not a staff person there for the gun show people to talk to? Or is the database so bad that they can't keep it running with a minimal IT support crew? It is But I did not go far enough with the info The NICS data base is only available to licenced sellers. Those wishing to sell privatley have no access to the system The other issue it is crashes frequently Not sure what level of IT support is needed to get past this Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #434 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote there are two major hold ups to fixing what is called the loophole 1 the NICS system runs on a small staff on weekends. Weekends are when most gun shows are held. Those wanting to fix the loopholes do not want to fix the NICS issue {/reply] I thought it was all a computerized database? Do you mean it is not and there is not a staff person there for the gun show people to talk to? Or is the database so bad that they can't keep it running with a minimal IT support crew? It is But I did not go far enough with the info The NICS data base is only available to licenced sellers. Those wishing to sell privatley have no access to the system The other issue it is crashes frequently Not sure what level of IT support is needed to get past this Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? Seems you gotta get snarky to feel good about yourself huh Nice"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #435 July 25, 2012 Quote Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? wrong question. Was the sky falling in the other 33, and did this change make a lick of difference, other than inconveniencing the people? Shall we compare crime rates in Illinois, CA, NY to those 33? I notice you're no long so eager to compare Chicago to X anymore. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites muff528 3 #436 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuote Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? wrong question. Was the sky falling in the other 33, and did this change make a lick of difference, other than inconveniencing the people? Shall we compare crime rates in Illinois, CA, NY to those 33? I notice you're no long so eager to compare Chicago to X anymore. Well, the mayor did order the gangs to leave the children alone. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites piisfish 140 #437 July 25, 2012 Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites matthewcline 0 #438 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie I can't see the theater being liable either, unless the angle is to show they didn't enforce their rules with detectors and security, thus endangering the patrons. MattAn Instructors first concern is student safety. So, start being safe, first!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Skyrad 0 #439 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie You should have been a lawyer!When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #440 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie You don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #441 July 25, 2012 QuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #442 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Hehath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) Agreed on all accounts, but if you wanted to apply any, even vague, logic to the lawsuit, you'd probably want to "blame" the film that gave the shooter the idea of being "The Joker."quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DaVinci 0 #443 July 25, 2012 QuoteI think you missed Bill's point that by law it is illegal to sell beer in your house. I think you missed the point that I was talking about the so called 'loophole' But looking at Bill's point.... Still not the same. See he is CREATING beer. It is illegal for me to MAKE a weapon for sale without a license. So: * It is illegal to make beer for sale without a license. * It is illegal to make a firearm for sale without a license. * It is legal for me to make beer without a license if it is for personal consumption. * It is legal for me to make a firearm for myself. But there are taxes to make a weapon, not to make beer. Further: * It is legal for me to make beer to GIVE it away. * It is ILLEGAL for me to make firearms to give them away. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DaVinci 0 #444 July 25, 2012 QuoteI can't see the theater being liable either, unless the angle is to show they didn't enforce their rules with detectors and security, thus endangering the patrons. Bingo..... When they do not allow people to protect themselves, they take on the added responsibility of protecting them to a higher standard. I am for gun free areas..... As long as EVERYONE has to pass through a metal detector and there are armed guards at each entry and exit point. Without that.... they just make the area a soft target. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,118 #445 July 25, 2012 >I bought a case of beer the other night for $18...I gave half to my uncle and he >gave me $9. How long will it take for the ATF to raid my house? Probably never. Now try selling it on the corner like Lucy sold lemonade . . . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyDekker 1,465 #446 July 25, 2012 QuoteStill not the same. See he is CREATING beer. It is illegal for me to MAKE a weapon for sale without a license. Lol *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. (In the end they are different products, most people understand that different products can be treated differently) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #447 July 25, 2012 Quote *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. in certain states. Rules for both alcohol and guns vary considerably. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DaVinci 0 #448 July 25, 2012 QuoteLol *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. (In the end they are different products, most people understand that different products can be treated differently) Then maybe you should ask Bill why he used it as an example? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ryoder 1,590 #449 July 26, 2012 QuoteQuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) Actually, the only good parts of that movie were the ones where Heath was in the scene. The rest of the movie was a crashing bore. OK, now the story gets juicy: http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/25/james-holmes-prostitutes/"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Skyrad 0 #450 July 26, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotenuts +1, a senseless tragedy. And regardless of this person’s religious or political leanings, in the end, he is just disturbed..... Period..... Right, we need to do a FAR BETTER JOB keeping guns out of the hands of nutcases. Good job all those CCW holders were around to prevent this. Just one man carrying a Ninja Glock would have made all the difference. The Perp wouldn't have stood a chance against a have a go hero Xbox Veteran, if they were equipped with a Ninja Glock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAvYQSsGdMwWhen an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next Page 18 of 28 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
rushmc 23 #434 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote there are two major hold ups to fixing what is called the loophole 1 the NICS system runs on a small staff on weekends. Weekends are when most gun shows are held. Those wanting to fix the loopholes do not want to fix the NICS issue {/reply] I thought it was all a computerized database? Do you mean it is not and there is not a staff person there for the gun show people to talk to? Or is the database so bad that they can't keep it running with a minimal IT support crew? It is But I did not go far enough with the info The NICS data base is only available to licenced sellers. Those wishing to sell privatley have no access to the system The other issue it is crashes frequently Not sure what level of IT support is needed to get past this Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? Seems you gotta get snarky to feel good about yourself huh Nice"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #435 July 25, 2012 Quote Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? wrong question. Was the sky falling in the other 33, and did this change make a lick of difference, other than inconveniencing the people? Shall we compare crime rates in Illinois, CA, NY to those 33? I notice you're no long so eager to compare Chicago to X anymore. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites muff528 3 #436 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuote Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? wrong question. Was the sky falling in the other 33, and did this change make a lick of difference, other than inconveniencing the people? Shall we compare crime rates in Illinois, CA, NY to those 33? I notice you're no long so eager to compare Chicago to X anymore. Well, the mayor did order the gangs to leave the children alone. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites piisfish 140 #437 July 25, 2012 Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites matthewcline 0 #438 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie I can't see the theater being liable either, unless the angle is to show they didn't enforce their rules with detectors and security, thus endangering the patrons. MattAn Instructors first concern is student safety. So, start being safe, first!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Skyrad 0 #439 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie You should have been a lawyer!When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #440 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie You don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #441 July 25, 2012 QuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #442 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Hehath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) Agreed on all accounts, but if you wanted to apply any, even vague, logic to the lawsuit, you'd probably want to "blame" the film that gave the shooter the idea of being "The Joker."quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DaVinci 0 #443 July 25, 2012 QuoteI think you missed Bill's point that by law it is illegal to sell beer in your house. I think you missed the point that I was talking about the so called 'loophole' But looking at Bill's point.... Still not the same. See he is CREATING beer. It is illegal for me to MAKE a weapon for sale without a license. So: * It is illegal to make beer for sale without a license. * It is illegal to make a firearm for sale without a license. * It is legal for me to make beer without a license if it is for personal consumption. * It is legal for me to make a firearm for myself. But there are taxes to make a weapon, not to make beer. Further: * It is legal for me to make beer to GIVE it away. * It is ILLEGAL for me to make firearms to give them away. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DaVinci 0 #444 July 25, 2012 QuoteI can't see the theater being liable either, unless the angle is to show they didn't enforce their rules with detectors and security, thus endangering the patrons. Bingo..... When they do not allow people to protect themselves, they take on the added responsibility of protecting them to a higher standard. I am for gun free areas..... As long as EVERYONE has to pass through a metal detector and there are armed guards at each entry and exit point. Without that.... they just make the area a soft target. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 3,118 #445 July 25, 2012 >I bought a case of beer the other night for $18...I gave half to my uncle and he >gave me $9. How long will it take for the ATF to raid my house? Probably never. Now try selling it on the corner like Lucy sold lemonade . . . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites SkyDekker 1,465 #446 July 25, 2012 QuoteStill not the same. See he is CREATING beer. It is illegal for me to MAKE a weapon for sale without a license. Lol *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. (In the end they are different products, most people understand that different products can be treated differently) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #447 July 25, 2012 Quote *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. in certain states. Rules for both alcohol and guns vary considerably. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DaVinci 0 #448 July 25, 2012 QuoteLol *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. (In the end they are different products, most people understand that different products can be treated differently) Then maybe you should ask Bill why he used it as an example? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites ryoder 1,590 #449 July 26, 2012 QuoteQuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) Actually, the only good parts of that movie were the ones where Heath was in the scene. The rest of the movie was a crashing bore. OK, now the story gets juicy: http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/25/james-holmes-prostitutes/"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Skyrad 0 #450 July 26, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotenuts +1, a senseless tragedy. And regardless of this person’s religious or political leanings, in the end, he is just disturbed..... Period..... Right, we need to do a FAR BETTER JOB keeping guns out of the hands of nutcases. Good job all those CCW holders were around to prevent this. Just one man carrying a Ninja Glock would have made all the difference. The Perp wouldn't have stood a chance against a have a go hero Xbox Veteran, if they were equipped with a Ninja Glock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAvYQSsGdMwWhen an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next Page 18 of 28 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
kelpdiver 2 #435 July 25, 2012 Quote Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? wrong question. Was the sky falling in the other 33, and did this change make a lick of difference, other than inconveniencing the people? Shall we compare crime rates in Illinois, CA, NY to those 33? I notice you're no long so eager to compare Chicago to X anymore. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muff528 3 #436 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuote Well, Mr. Little, did the sky fall in the 17 states (including your own) that have to some degree or other closed the loophole? wrong question. Was the sky falling in the other 33, and did this change make a lick of difference, other than inconveniencing the people? Shall we compare crime rates in Illinois, CA, NY to those 33? I notice you're no long so eager to compare Chicago to X anymore. Well, the mayor did order the gangs to leave the children alone. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #437 July 25, 2012 Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matthewcline 0 #438 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie I can't see the theater being liable either, unless the angle is to show they didn't enforce their rules with detectors and security, thus endangering the patrons. MattAn Instructors first concern is student safety. So, start being safe, first!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #439 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie You should have been a lawyer!When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #440 July 25, 2012 Quote Quote Let the idiotic lawsuits begin: Brown's attorney plans to target three defendants -- the theater, doctors who the attorney says gave the shooting suspect several medications and the movie studio that made "The Dark Knight Rises." http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/31298006/detail.html attacking the movie studio wouldn't be valid, as the nutter had not seen the movie yet, therefore had not been influenced by the movie You don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #441 July 25, 2012 QuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #442 July 25, 2012 QuoteQuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Hehath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) Agreed on all accounts, but if you wanted to apply any, even vague, logic to the lawsuit, you'd probably want to "blame" the film that gave the shooter the idea of being "The Joker."quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #443 July 25, 2012 QuoteI think you missed Bill's point that by law it is illegal to sell beer in your house. I think you missed the point that I was talking about the so called 'loophole' But looking at Bill's point.... Still not the same. See he is CREATING beer. It is illegal for me to MAKE a weapon for sale without a license. So: * It is illegal to make beer for sale without a license. * It is illegal to make a firearm for sale without a license. * It is legal for me to make beer without a license if it is for personal consumption. * It is legal for me to make a firearm for myself. But there are taxes to make a weapon, not to make beer. Further: * It is legal for me to make beer to GIVE it away. * It is ILLEGAL for me to make firearms to give them away. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #444 July 25, 2012 QuoteI can't see the theater being liable either, unless the angle is to show they didn't enforce their rules with detectors and security, thus endangering the patrons. Bingo..... When they do not allow people to protect themselves, they take on the added responsibility of protecting them to a higher standard. I am for gun free areas..... As long as EVERYONE has to pass through a metal detector and there are armed guards at each entry and exit point. Without that.... they just make the area a soft target. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #445 July 25, 2012 >I bought a case of beer the other night for $18...I gave half to my uncle and he >gave me $9. How long will it take for the ATF to raid my house? Probably never. Now try selling it on the corner like Lucy sold lemonade . . . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #446 July 25, 2012 QuoteStill not the same. See he is CREATING beer. It is illegal for me to MAKE a weapon for sale without a license. Lol *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. (In the end they are different products, most people understand that different products can be treated differently) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #447 July 25, 2012 Quote *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. in certain states. Rules for both alcohol and guns vary considerably. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #448 July 25, 2012 QuoteLol *It is illegal to sell beer in a private sale. *It is legal to sell a firearm in a private sale. (In the end they are different products, most people understand that different products can be treated differently) Then maybe you should ask Bill why he used it as an example? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #449 July 26, 2012 QuoteQuoteYou don't sue them for making this movie. You sue them for making the one with Heath Ledger. The one with Heath should be awarded for being an excellent and powerful movie. (agree, suing them is a nuisance lawsuit and hopefully will be thrown out completely) Actually, the only good parts of that movie were the ones where Heath was in the scene. The rest of the movie was a crashing bore. OK, now the story gets juicy: http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/25/james-holmes-prostitutes/"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #450 July 26, 2012 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotenuts +1, a senseless tragedy. And regardless of this person’s religious or political leanings, in the end, he is just disturbed..... Period..... Right, we need to do a FAR BETTER JOB keeping guns out of the hands of nutcases. Good job all those CCW holders were around to prevent this. Just one man carrying a Ninja Glock would have made all the difference. The Perp wouldn't have stood a chance against a have a go hero Xbox Veteran, if they were equipped with a Ninja Glock. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAvYQSsGdMwWhen an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites