0
DiverMike

Pay tax on Olympic Earnings.

Recommended Posts

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olympics-fourth-place-medal/winning-gold-medal-brings-9-000-tax-bill-171555961--oly.html

I strongly support not making military personnel pay income tax when they are serving in a combat zone. To my knowledge, that is one of the few exclusions (and it is only available for enilisted and warrant officers).

Senator Marco Rubio now wants to put Olympic athletes in the same category as military personnel putting themselves in harms way in a combat zone.

Is pointing your toes really well worth the same benefit?
For the same reason I jump off a perfectly good diving board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/olympics-fourth-place-medal/winning-gold-medal-brings-9-000-tax-bill-171555961--oly.html

I strongly support not making military personnel pay income tax when they are serving in a combat zone. To my knowledge, that is one of the few exclusions (and it is only available for enilisted and warrant officers).

Senator Marco Rubio now wants to put Olympic athletes in the same category as military personnel putting themselves in harms way in a combat zone.

Is pointing your toes really well worth the same benefit?



Actually I would like to see a law that any person who serves in combat, NEVER pays federal income tax again

As for th medal tax? I guess I do not see this as the same thing
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The United States Olympic Committee is a private, non-profit organization not affiliated in any way with the US Government. No national olympic committee (NOC) in the world is affilliated with their government. They are all private entities. Olympic athletes are no more official representatives of the US than skydivers competing in Dubai.

Also, of the three groups you mentioned, only the soldier is being shot at.
For the same reason I jump off a perfectly good diving board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The difference is the soldier and the Olympic Athlete are officially representing the U.S. The skydiver is not.



If they are on the officially sanctioned team, they are, every bit as much as an olympic athlete.
----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't see an issue with them having to pay taxes, except the amounts quoted in that story seem like an unreasonably high percent of their earnings???



I *think* "Winnings" are taxed differently. But that is a total and utter guess :)
Performance Designs Factory Team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I don't see an issue with them having to pay taxes, except the amounts quoted in that story seem like an unreasonably high percent of their earnings???



I *think* "Winnings" are taxed differently. But that is a total and utter guess :)


I believe it is taxed the same as other earnings. That article just lazily and incorrectly put everything into the highest marginal tax bracket and didn't allow any deductions for expenses. Very few medal winners are going to reach the highest tax bracket. Poor, poor journalism.
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As a US citizen you get taxed on your WORLD WIDE INCOME. Why should it matter that they are athletes. They get to claim business expenses against the cash prize earnings, and most won't pay any taxes unless they fail to report expenses.

I am almost choking on the irony of people are bitching that the rich should pay more taxes, and then in the same breath they state that the like of Phelps should pay no taxes because he is good at swimming in a pool.
"The restraining order says you're only allowed to touch me in freefall"
=P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I am almost choking on the irony of people are bitching that the rich should pay more
>taxes, and then in the same breath they state that the like of Phelps should pay no
>taxes because he is good at swimming in a pool.

Everyone wants "their guys" to pay less taxes. The hardworking athletes! The noble soldiers! The selfless job-creating rich! The disadvantaged poor! There's plenty of irony no matter which side of the aisle you're on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The United States Olympic Committee is a private, non-profit organization not affiliated in any way with the US Government. No national olympic committee (NOC) in the world is affilliated with their government. They are all private entities. Olympic athletes are no more official representatives of the US than skydivers competing in Dubai.

Also, of the three groups you mentioned, only the soldier is being shot at.



If they aren't "officially" representing their respective countries, then why can't the name be changed to the Fed-Ex Olympic Team?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I don't see an issue with them having to pay taxes, except the amounts quoted in that story seem like an unreasonably high percent of their earnings???



I *think* "Winnings" are taxed differently. But that is a total and utter guess :)


The taxation is the same. But the withholdings might be excessive, treated like bonuses are. At year end, this is resolved.

The article (which is really a copy of another from a conservative think tank) is deliberately misleading on the topic. Or less politely - lying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't see an issue with them having to pay taxes, except the amounts quoted in that story seem like an unreasonably high percent of their earnings???



The amounts look right, work for Olympians not in high tax brackets although the article authors did not consider that, and I agree that they're too high.

A single athlete who doesn't make it past the Social security cap should be paying

4.2% FICA
1.45% Medicare
6.2% employer's share of FICA (this is self-employment income)
1.45% employer's share of Medicare
sub total 13.3%

on top of normal income tax rates.

Assuming they make enough to support themselves that would put them in the 25% bracket

13.3% + 25% = 38.3%, $9575 on a gold

Where the athlete in question is also a Californian they'd be subject to SDI at 1% and probably be in the 9.3% bracket

38.3% + 10.3% = 48.3%, $12,075 on gold

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Exactly, they officially require them to use the name of the country they represent.

?? Right. That does not mean they are representing the US.

Perris could have a 4-way competition where every team was required to use their country's name. It wouldn't mean that Mark Brown's "US team" was officially representing the US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0