Gun industry thrives under Obama

[RonD1120 62]

Quote

Nobody said they were the only rifle out there.

When you go to do some house maintenance which brand of tool do you use? DeWalt, Skil, Makita, Black and Decker?

They are all a little different but do the same thing right? Now imagine the government trying to tell you you can only use DeWalt. Why only Dewalt you ask? Skil sounds too much like kill. Makita sounds like my kill ya. Black and Decker implies racism and violence against women?

Sounds ridiculous right? So does banning things that you admittedly know nothing about.

And scared of something that can be fired repeatdly and quickly?? Yeah ya mean like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELol1dHjHEE

that was all video game technique. So should every firearm be banned now cause if you train you can do that?

I am praying this does not happen:

KUHNER: Obama backers threaten postelection violence
Grievance politics have set the stage for mayhem

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/18/obama-backers-threaten-postelection-violence-griev/

If it does happen, which tool would you choose?

Look for the shiny things of God revealed by the Holy Spirit. They only last for an instant but it is a Holy Instant. Let your soul absorb them.

[DrewEckhardt 0]

Quote

Here. see if you can twist and misunderstand what I said, again.

Quote

I don't know how many times we are going to have to tell gun-o-phobes that fully automatic weapons are mostly illegal.

That means manufacturers haven't made fully automatic weapons since 1968. The only people who can posses them are police and military. So with these exceptions, if you find one manufactured after 1968 in the hands of a citizen, it probably means that person does not legally own that weapon. Making ownership of fully automatic weapons mostly illegal. Now go ahead and show us how brilliant you are.

Nope.

Although automatic weapons made after FOPA passed in 1986 are not legal for civilian ownership apart from Special Occupational Tax payers (dealers and manufacturers) people who live in free states, pay the $200 transfer tax, and are willing to pay extra for the scarcity (a transferable M16 might run $8000+ instead of $800+ although you can get open bolt submachine guns like MACs for half that) are welcome to own them and the price tag isn't out of line with other big boy toys.

Only one such legally owned machine gun has been used in a crime, when a crooked Ohio police officer used his personally owned MAC to murder a drug dealer.

[Gravitymaster 0]

Right, in other words, they are mostly illegal for citizens to own unless they were made before the ban..

[CanuckInUSA 0]

Quote

Nobody said they were the only rifle out there.

When you go to do some house maintenance which brand of tool do you use? DeWalt, Skil, Makita, Black and Decker?

They are all a little different but do the same thing right? Now imagine the government trying to tell you you can only use DeWalt. Why only Dewalt you ask? Skil sounds too much like kill. Makita sounds like my kill ya. Black and Decker implies racism and violence against women?

Sounds ridiculous right? So does banning things that you admittedly know nothing about.

You just described what is going on in Canada. Semi-automatic AK47s are prohibited in Canada. But semi-automatic CZ 858s are allowed and not only that, they are classified as non-restricted meaning they do not need to be registered and the crazy storage and transportation rules that apply to restricted firearms in Canada do NOT apply to the non-restricted CZ 858. Now the CZ 858s are not 100% clones of the AK47. The actions between the two are different designs. But the CZ 858 looks like an AK47 and it fires the exact same 7.62x39mm rounds. Makes no sense. Of course beggars can't be choosy. At least for now the CZ 858 is permitted. How long before the gun grabbers find out and demand the scary looking CZ 858 also be banned even though it is not as powerful as your standard .308 hunting rifle.

Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

[CarpeDiem3 0]

Quote

Here. see if you can twist and misunderstand what I said, again.

Quote

I don't know how many times we are going to have to tell gun-o-phobes that fully automatic weapons are mostly illegal.

That means manufacturers haven't made fully automatic weapons since 1968. The only people who can posses them are police and military. So with these exceptions, if you find one manufactured after 1968 in the hands of a citizen, it probably means that person does not legally own that weapon. Making ownership of fully automatic weapons mostly illegal. Now go ahead and show us how brilliant you are.

No need to get insulting.

One simple question for you:
Is it legal for private citizens to own full-auto firearms?

Please answer "yes" or "no".

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Here. see if you can twist and misunderstand what I said, again.

Quote

I don't know how many times we are going to have to tell gun-o-phobes that fully automatic weapons are mostly illegal.

That means manufacturers haven't made fully automatic weapons since 1968. The only people who can posses them are police and military. So with these exceptions, if you find one manufactured after 1968 in the hands of a citizen, it probably means that person does not legally own that weapon. Making ownership of fully automatic weapons mostly illegal. Now go ahead and show us how brilliant you are.

No need to get insulting.

One simple question for you:
Is it legal for private citizens to own full-auto firearms?

Please answer "yes" or "no".

The answer is yes
But extreme regulation and fees are required

Now answer me a question

How many crimes have been committed in the US with full automatic weapons in the last ten years?

How about another question

How many private citizens own fully automatic weapons in the US today?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Gravitymaster 0]

Quote

Quote

Here. see if you can twist and misunderstand what I said, again.

Quote

I don't know how many times we are going to have to tell gun-o-phobes that fully automatic weapons are mostly illegal.

That means manufacturers haven't made fully automatic weapons since 1968. The only people who can posses them are police and military. So with these exceptions, if you find one manufactured after 1968 in the hands of a citizen, it probably means that person does not legally own that weapon. Making ownership of fully automatic weapons mostly illegal. Now go ahead and show us how brilliant you are.

No need to get insulting.

One simple question for you:
Is it legal for private citizens to own full-auto firearms?

Please answer "yes" or "no".

Had you been paying attention, you would know that the answer is not yes or no. We have tried to explain it to you but you are either not capable of understanding for some reason or have chosen to be intentionally argumentative. Either way, I'm done trying to help you understand.

[CarpeDiem3 0]

Quote

One simple question for you:
Is it legal for private citizens to own full-auto firearms?

Please answer "yes" or "no".

The answer is yes

[jtiflyer 0]

Quote

Quote

One simple question for you:
Is it legal for private citizens to own full-auto firearms?

Please answer "yes" or "no".

The answer is yes

Thank you Rush. Gravityman seems to have trouble giving straight answers like that.

[rushmc 23]

Quote

Quote

Quote

One simple question for you:
Is it legal for private citizens to own full-auto firearms?

Please answer "yes" or "no".

The answer is yes

Thank you Rush. Gravityman seems to have trouble giving straight answers like that.

of course that also depends on what state you live in also.