rushmc 23 #2251 July 5, 2016 SkyDekkerCongress has spent more time looking into Benghazi than: 9/11 Watergate JFK assassination Pearl Harbour Because they did not see the level of stonewalling done by Hillary. Even the judges are getting pissed off by it. (the stonewalling) Nice try though."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #2252 July 5, 2016 rushmc***Congress has spent more time looking into Benghazi than: 9/11 Watergate JFK assassination Pearl Harbour Because they did not see the level of stonewalling done by Hillary. Even the judges are getting pissed off by it. (the stonewalling) Nice try though. Nice try? Just a factual statement. Though we know that you and facts aren't close friends. You do better with headlines. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #2253 July 5, 2016 QuoteNice try? Just a factual statement. Though we know that you and facts aren't close friends. You do better with headlines. But then he would have to deal with the headline that said the FBI recommends no charges be filed against Clinton. I don't think his little heart could take it. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #2254 July 5, 2016 DanGQuoteNice try? Just a factual statement. Though we know that you and facts aren't close friends. You do better with headlines. But then he would have to deal with the headline that said the FBI recommends no charges be filed against Clinton. I don't think his little heart could take it. Well, all the Far-right wingnut sites (Western Journalism is one) are going ape over the decision not to indict."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #2255 July 5, 2016 >Congress has spent more time looking into Benghazi than: >9/11 But far more people died in Benghazi than in the 9/11 attacks! Well, at least far more ambassadors. >Watergate But this was so much worse than Watergate! There were lies, nearly criminal actions and incompetence, none of which were present during Watergate. >JFK assassination This was far worse than a president being killed. Clinton planned to kill all those people, just like Oswald. At least that's what I saw on JailHillary.com. >Pearl Harbour But we knew all about that. I mean, once the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor, we knew we had to kill those krauts, and that was a great war overall anyway. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pbwing 0 #2256 July 5, 2016 thank you Mr. Blutarsky http://youtu.be/V8lT1o0sDwI SFW Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #2257 July 5, 2016 rushmc***Congress has spent more time looking into Benghazi than: 9/11 Watergate JFK assassination Pearl Harbour Because they did not see the level of stonewalling done by Hillary. Even the judges are getting pissed off by it. (the stonewalling) Nice try though. Right, no stonewalling after Watergate. Would you like to buy a bridge?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #2258 July 5, 2016 kallend ******Congress has spent more time looking into Benghazi than: 9/11 Watergate JFK assassination Pearl Harbour Because they did not see the level of stonewalling done by Hillary. Even the judges are getting pissed off by it. (the stonewalling) Nice try though. Right, no stonewalling after Watergate. Would you like to buy a bridge? If I remember All The President's Men correctly Nixon and Liddy were so overcome with remorse that they immediately came clean, turned over their co-conspirators, released the Watergate Tapes without a struggle and definitely didn't knowingly destroy evidence. Heck, it was all so straightforward and above board I don't even know why they made it into a filmDo you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #2259 July 24, 2016 I wonder how Trump will handle this? http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mother-slain-us-diplomat-trump-stop-death-political/story?id=40824240 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 333 #2260 July 24, 2016 jclalorI wonder how Trump will handle this? http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mother-slain-us-diplomat-trump-stop-death-political/story?id=40824240 He will say "you don't always get what you want..." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #2261 July 24, 2016 >I wonder how Trump will handle this? If history is any guide, he may claim she's on the rag, and that's why she is saying such mean things about Trump. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites