Andy9o8 2 #151 January 22, 2013 QuoteWhy do you keep saying that? Because he can keep sucking someone in to respond to it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #152 January 22, 2013 >You need to see the original not a copy to be convinced that the document is real. They did. >She's the only one who saw it. Fuddy saw them as well. Unless she's in on the conspiracy too, of course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #153 January 22, 2013 Quote >You need to see the original not a copy to be convinced that the document is real. They did. >She's the only one who saw it. Fuddy saw them as well. Unless she's in on the conspiracy too, of course. Of course she's in on it. They're ALL in on it. Everyone who says that it isn't true is in on it. Even you. "There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #154 January 22, 2013 QuoteQuotePerhaps the Supreme Court Justice knows you can't pass a book through any typewriter that they'll wonder and ask questions regarding any documents. But who knows. Again, no. WRONG. Why do you keep saying that? It was submitted to a Clerk who put it on a docket. NO SUPREME COURT JUSTICE REVIEWED IT AND MADE A DECISION TO DO ANYTHING WITH IT. I'll break it down into a very simple process for you. You mail in a petition for cert. If the Clerk cannot eliminate it on technical grounds (e.g., it's in the wrong font, it is not printed on white paper, it's not printed on black ink, they didn't pay the filing fee), then it goes on the calendar. At a conference of the Justices (which Ms. Taitz will NOT be at - nor will any other counsel), the Supremes decide which of the 10,000 per annum cert petitions they receive each year will be heard. They typically hear about 100. Saying "ZOMG the Supremes are going to hear this" is like saying "I won the lottery because I bought a ticket." It's a necessary step, but it's not the only step. If the Supremes GRANT cert, they will hear it. Until then, you have absolutely nothing of any substance. Do you understand now? I never said the SCOTUS was going to hear it on the 15th. You not reading... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #155 January 22, 2013 Quote >Mainly because I have no opinion on the matter. Of course! You're just "curious." You are "fascinated" by "all the discrepancies." You have no stake in the matter, but you "hope intelligent people will ask questions." You could absolutely, positively care less about the outcome, but certainly hope all the "clueless sheep wake up before it's too late." >how a typist can put a bound book through the non electric ribbon style typewritter >because the Corona typwriter I have, demonstrates it would be impossible to pass >pages of a bound book through a typewriter. You know who could do that? Hitler, that's who! >Perhaps the Supreme Court Justice knows you can't pass a book through any >typewriter that they'll wonder and ask questions regarding any documents. It is likely that Chief Justice Roberts is, at this moment, thinking "dang, I wonder if I can continue the coverup? Can I just play dumb and hope no one catches onto the Corona - book thing?" I'm probably the only who has brought it up. Tell me, how would you put a bound book with multiple pages into a typewriter roller? You are smart. Can you figure it out. Because it sure doesn't make sense to me that you could stuff a book into a non electric typwriter type what you need to on a page, then hand the whole book over to Ms OBAMA to sign? Yea I'm curious, the reason I have no opinion. I HAVE NO OPINION. I don't know the facts. But YOU HAVE ALL THE FACTS. Afterall you are a BELIEVER. Here's a parachute duly indicated it was packed. Now go and jump. And stop asking stupid questions. You crack me up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #156 January 22, 2013 QuoteYou crack me up. Awesome. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #157 January 22, 2013 QuoteI never said the SCOTUS was going to hear it on the 15th. You not reading... "Case seems to be picking up steam if Supreme Court will hear case." "She got an audience with the entire Supreme Court on Feb 15 for conference,"Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #158 January 22, 2013 QuoteTell me, how would you put a bound book with multiple pages into a typewriter roller? You are smart. Can you figure it out. Because it sure doesn't make sense to me that you could stuff a book into a non electric typwriter type what you need to on a page, then hand the whole book over to Ms OBAMA to sign? Yeah, makes far more sense that they would create a fake document and before copying it for distribution, for no apparent reason put it into a bound book despite knowing that the real documents aren't stored in book form.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #159 January 22, 2013 QuoteQuoteTell me, how would you put a bound book with multiple pages into a typewriter roller? You are smart. Can you figure it out. Because it sure doesn't make sense to me that you could stuff a book into a non electric typwriter type what you need to on a page, then hand the whole book over to Ms OBAMA to sign? Yeah, makes far more sense that they would create a fake document and before copying it for distribution, for no apparent reason put it into a bound book despite knowing that the real documents aren't stored in book form. Well, of course they would! How else would anyone know they are in on it?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #160 January 22, 2013 Quote Quote Tell me, how would you put a bound book with multiple pages into a typewriter roller? You are smart. Can you figure it out. Because it sure doesn't make sense to me that you could stuff a book into a non electric typwriter type what you need to on a page, then hand the whole book over to Ms OBAMA to sign? Yeah, makes far more sense that they would create a fake document and before copying it for distribution, for no apparent reason put it into a bound book despite knowing that the real documents aren't stored in book form. There is a bound book there is not a bound book. OMG I'm ILMFAOYou guys are all over the place, I suppose that's how it is in the sky too, all over the place. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #161 January 22, 2013 QuoteQuoteI never said the SCOTUS was going to hear it on the 15th. You not reading... "Case seems to be picking up steam if Supreme Court will hear case." "She got an audience with the entire Supreme Court on Feb 15 for conference," I hate it too when I leave my phone unlocked and someone posts from my account when I go to the bathroom at the Prop...Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #162 January 22, 2013 >Yea I'm curious, the reason I have no opinion. I HAVE NO OPINION. I don't know >the facts. OHCHUTE: Birth certificate and social security and supposedly even OBAMA's name are not real. Imposter OHCHUTE: Fraud and Conspiracy OHCHUTE: This guy is bogus. But the Kabal behind him is real. You're almost more fun than Shah. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #163 January 22, 2013 Quote>Yea I'm curious, the reason I have no opinion. I HAVE NO OPINION. I don't know >the facts. OHCHUTE: Birth certificate and social security and supposedly even OBAMA's name are not real. Imposter OHCHUTE: Fraud and Conspiracy OHCHUTE: This guy is bogus. But the Kabal behind him is real. You're almost more fun than Shah. BILLVON: Stop asking questions. BILLVON: I KNOW ALL THE FACTS BILLVON: Government would never never convince anyone to do anything. BILLVON: I'm a BELIEVER. You guys should hear yourselves. If you would act this way with a machine gun in your face like what happened to me, you'd either be dead or eating rice in some hole. You certainly wouldn't act this way at the DZ around the picknic table carrying on a similar conversation in person. See you on the Feb 15. Keep your fingers crossed. As all your dreams might come true. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #164 January 22, 2013 QuoteYou guys should hear yourselves. Even awesomer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #165 January 22, 2013 >If you would act this way with a machine gun in your face like what happened to me You don't know the truth. YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH! I've faced three machine guns at the same time. You faced one? Pfft. >You certainly wouldn't act this way at the DZ around the picknic table carrying on >a similar conversation in person. You're right. We have no fun at our DZ. We are all super serious, and are always beating up people who point machine guns at us (three, in my case.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stumpy 284 #166 January 22, 2013 Quote You guys should hear yourselves. If you would act this way with a machine gun in your face like what happened to me, you'd either be dead or eating rice in some hole. You certainly wouldn't act this way at the DZ around the picknic table carrying on a similar conversation in person. See you on the Feb 15. Keep your fingers crossed. As all your dreams might come true. Fortunately, IRL, crackpot conspiracy theorists generally get ignored for what they are. Funny how they get more of a voice on the internet. Come on guys, stop feeding the troll. Rational discussion is wasted here.Never try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #167 January 22, 2013 Quote Quote Quote Tell me, how would you put a bound book with multiple pages into a typewriter roller? You are smart. Can you figure it out. Because it sure doesn't make sense to me that you could stuff a book into a non electric typwriter type what you need to on a page, then hand the whole book over to Ms OBAMA to sign? Yeah, makes far more sense that they would create a fake document and before copying it for distribution, for no apparent reason put it into a bound book despite knowing that the real documents aren't stored in book form. There is a bound book there is not a bound book. OMG I'm ILMFAO The other guys understood it. Why am I not surprised you didn't? I'll try and put it in larger print and smaller words: if you were making a fake document to copy and distribute, why would you put it into a book before photocopying it? Especially if you knew the real document would not be kept in a book?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #168 January 22, 2013 QuoteYou're right. We have no fun at our DZ. We are all super serious, and are always beating up people who point machine guns at us (three, in my case.) Three? Luxury! When I got into an argument at the DZ I was facing a platoon of infantry, five tanks, two helicopter gunships and had an aircraft carrier dropped on my head.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #169 January 22, 2013 QuoteQuoteYou're right. We have no fun at our DZ. We are all super serious, and are always beating up people who point machine guns at us (three, in my case.) Three? Luxury! When I got into an argument at the DZ I was facing a platoon of infantry, five tanks, two helicopter gunships and had an aircraft carrier dropped on my head. And I bet they made you live in a shoebox at the bottom of a lake, and eat gravel.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,523 #170 January 23, 2013 QuoteQuoteQuoteYou're right. We have no fun at our DZ. We are all super serious, and are always beating up people who point machine guns at us (three, in my case.) Three? Luxury! When I got into an argument at the DZ I was facing a platoon of infantry, five tanks, two helicopter gunships and had an aircraft carrier dropped on my head. And I bet they made you live in a shoebox at the bottom of a lake, and eat gravel. You got gravel to eat? Wow, we only got that if we were extra good."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stumpy 284 #171 January 23, 2013 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteYou're right. We have no fun at our DZ. We are all super serious, and are always beating up people who point machine guns at us (three, in my case.) Three? Luxury! When I got into an argument at the DZ I was facing a platoon of infantry, five tanks, two helicopter gunships and had an aircraft carrier dropped on my head. And I bet they made you live in a shoebox at the bottom of a lake, and eat gravel. You got gravel to eat? Wow, we only got that if we were extra good. Tell that to kids today, and they won't believe you.Never try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OHCHUTE 0 #172 January 23, 2013 Quote Quote Quote Quote Tell me, how would you put a bound book with multiple pages into a typewriter roller? You are smart. Can you figure it out. Because it sure doesn't make sense to me that you could stuff a book into a non electric typwriter type what you need to on a page, then hand the whole book over to Ms OBAMA to sign? Yeah, makes far more sense that they would create a fake document and before copying it for distribution, for no apparent reason put it into a bound book despite knowing that the real documents aren't stored in book form. There is a bound book there is not a bound book. OMG I'm ILMFAO The other guys understood it. Why am I not surprised you didn't? I'll try and put it in larger print and smaller words: if you were making a fake document to copy and distribute, why would you put it into a book before photocopying it? Especially if you knew the real document would not be kept in a book? The allegory. The Book of Vital Records. THE BOUND BOOK. The Bible. The Gospel Truth. Being in a bound book sounds pretty official than simply a copy of the birth certificate. I'm not say anything is fake. The only thing I"m asking is how did they put the bound book into the typewriter to do the typing on it? Can't be done. Surely they didn't make a bound book of a collection of Birth Certificates did they. I don't have a clue. All I know is that we've given Obama millions to go to Hawaii to eat snow cones and he's never once gone to the office to see his own birth certificate. Instead he spent a few million to suppress the information. I suspect the reason he didn't want the information released is that hardly anyone knew his middle name was Hussein. If you remember Bush vilified the name "Hussein" as a rat, that needed smoked from a hole. So from a marketing communications aspect, it was quite natural for the team to not want that info in the public eye. Had nothing to do with fake, or he wasn't born here etc. It was just he didn't want his name out there. NONE OF YOU MENTIONED THIS ASPECT Would you want your Hussein , a muslim name out there trying to get votes from a public that was taught to hate Hussein and Muslim terrorists. NO. The reason they tried to get it hushed up. You will note Hussein was not mentioned during the swearing in yesterday. They used "H" Obama. They didn't use Hussein during the first campaign. And of course Obama could never come out and say why they wanted to keep the info in the background.....VOTES, and in doing so they were faced with speculation. I didn't start the speculation and I've not bought into any of it. Now run along little doggies....your pissing in the wind and looking a little wet right now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #173 January 23, 2013 Quoteyour pissing in the wind Still awesomer. You're quickly becoming my hero. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #174 January 23, 2013 >You will note Hussein was not mentioned during the swearing in yesterday. They >used "H" Obama. That's not even a very good lie. (Download any Youtube video of the inauguration.) To be a good troll it has to be somewhat believable. >I didn't start the speculation and I've not bought into any of it . . . . >he spent a few million to suppress the information. Now, see, that's better. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stumpy 284 #175 January 23, 2013 Quote(Download any Youtube video of the inauguration.) \ Ah - but see Bill that would be no good because it would only be a COPY of the video. The original video definitely has him swearing on the Koran.Never try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites