jgoose71 0 #1 January 28, 2013 This one is going to be interesting.... http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/01/21/missouri-sheriffs-pledge-to-not-enforce-obamas-gun-control-laws/ The actual bill: http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills131/biltxt/intro/HB0170I.htm"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #2 January 28, 2013 I could have sworn we had a thread about this; I remember posting to it. But alas, now I can't find it in a search. I think I'm losing it. ----------------- ETA : OK, I found them. 2 threads, about almost-identical bills introduced in, respectively, Wyoming and Texas. http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4424780#4424780 http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4426011#4426011 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #3 January 28, 2013 Quote I could have sworn we had a thread about this; I remember posting to it. But alas, now I can't find it in a search. I think I'm losing it. Lol well several dumbass states have introduced legislation like this Unfortunately now its my dumbass state. Fun fact: It is illegal for an employer in MO to fire you for owning a firearm. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. It is NOT illegal to be fired for sexual orientation in MO. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. Here is the email I sent her when she introduced the bill about making it illegal to be fired for owning a gun.... "Miss Brown Please step down from public service. Your complete and utter ignorance is such an insult to all of Missouri. Please please, never again cast a vote that could actually affect someones life. You should probably try something more along the lines of recycling old cans. Thanks. XXXXXX" She didn't respond ;[. My state is fcked. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #4 January 28, 2013 QuoteIt is illegal for an employer in MO to fire you for owning a firearm. Because, after all, there's an epidemic of that happening. QuoteIt is NOT illegal to be fired for sexual orientation in MO. Because, of course, that's never been a problem. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #5 January 28, 2013 Quote I could have sworn we had a thread about this; I remember posting to it. But alas, now I can't find it in a search. I think I'm losing it. ----------------- ETA : OK, I found them. 2 threads, about almost-identical bills introduced in, respectively, Wyoming and Texas. http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4424780#4424780 http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4426011#4426011 Yes, but what makes this one intersetsting is the fact that it will be a felony to enforce federal law. If this passes, we'll get to see how close your predictions were in the previous theads I think Eric Holder, being the dirty, low down, partison, cock sucking, low life, bigoted, racist, power-grabbing, corrupt, Chicago-style, chicken-fucking, Attorney General that he is would put to shame anything you can think of. After all, this move goes against his extreme liberal agenda....."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
regulator 0 #6 January 28, 2013 Quote Quote I could have sworn we had a thread about this; I remember posting to it. But alas, now I can't find it in a search. I think I'm losing it. Lol well several dumbass states have introduced legislation like this Unfortunately now its my dumbass state. Fun fact: It is illegal for an employer in MO to fire you for owning a firearm. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. It is NOT illegal to be fired for sexual orientation in MO. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. Here is the email I sent her when she introduced the bill about making it illegal to be fired for owning a gun.... "Miss Brown Please step down from public service. Your complete and utter ignorance is such an insult to all of Missouri. Please please, never again cast a vote that could actually affect someones life. You should probably try something more along the lines of recycling old cans. Thanks. XXXXXX" She didn't respond ;[. My state is fcked. So you think firearm owners should lose their jobs. Thats mighty nice of you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #7 January 28, 2013 Like I said. Dumbass states. 0 understanding of the way laws work in the USA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #8 January 28, 2013 Lol. Sigh.... Employees were/are already protected from that by the 2nd amendment you so vehemently defend.... And there has never been a case of someone being fired for owning a gun legally in MO......ever.... ETA: The point being, it is another piece of completely useless legislation, just like this proposed bill. Since Federal Law is supreme, States have no authority to enforce such laws. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beowulf 1 #9 January 28, 2013 Apparently you have never heard of Nullification. States used nullify Federal laws that they disagreed with. It's part of the Constitution. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #10 January 28, 2013 :[ The theory of nullification has been rejected repeatedly by federal courts. The courts have declared that under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, federal law is superior to state law, and that under Article III of the Constitution, the federal judiciary has the final power to interpret the Constitution. Therefore, according to the courts, the power to make final decisions about the constitutionality of federal laws lies with the federal courts, not the states, and the states do not have the power to nullify federal laws. Just ETA for a specific: The Supreme Court explicitly rejected nullification in the case of Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958). The state of Arkansas had passed several laws in an effort to prevent the integration of its schools. The Supreme Court, in its only opinion to be signed by all nine justices, held that state governments had no power to nullify the Brown decision. The Supreme Court held that the Brown decision and its implementation "can neither be nullified openly and directly by state legislators or state executive or judicial officers nor nullified indirectly by them through evasive schemes for segregation whether attempted 'ingeniously or ingenuously.'"[61] Thus, Cooper v. Aaron directly held that states may not nullify federal law. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #11 January 28, 2013 So by this reasoning, states that have "legalized" marijuana are in conflict with federal law, right?"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
beowulf 1 #12 January 28, 2013 Looks like it might be challenged. I think the courts are wrong. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #13 January 28, 2013 QuoteSo by this reasoning, states that have "legalized" marijuana are in conflict with federal law, right? Yes. 100% This is a fact. This is why the AG has been in Washington (state) recently discussing with the governor how to move forward. ETA: This is also why big business hasn't entered the pot market. Once the federal conflicts are resolved you will see MARLBORO joints. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #14 January 28, 2013 Quote Looks like it might be challenged. I think the courts are wrong. It has been repeatedly challenged. That's great you think they are wrong. Get yourself appointed to the SCOTUS and change it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
regulator 0 #15 January 28, 2013 QuoteQuoteSo by this reasoning, states that have "legalized" marijuana are in conflict with federal law, right? Yes. 100% This is a fact. This is why the AG has been in Washington (state) recently discussing with the governor how to move forward. ETA: This is also why no big business has entered the pot market. Once the federal conflicts are resolved you will see MARLBORO joints. Marlboro already has a patent for marijuana ciggarettes should it ever become legalized. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #16 January 28, 2013 Hey we agreed on something! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #17 January 28, 2013 QuoteHey we agreed on something! the states might get this one because owning a firearm is a constitutional right but the school issue was not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #18 January 28, 2013 >So you think firearm owners should lose their jobs. No more so than you think gays should be BANNED from working. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bignugget 0 #19 January 28, 2013 QuoteQuoteHey we agreed on something! the states might get this one because owning a firearm is a constitutional right but the school issue was not. I wouldn't hold my breath if I was you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #20 January 28, 2013 Quote Marlboro already has a patent for marijuana ciggarettes should it ever become legalized. Do you have a patent number for that?"What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #21 January 28, 2013 QuoteQuoteHey we agreed on something! the states might get this one because owning a firearm is a constitutional right but the school issue was not. I predict it will fare exactly as well as nullification has the other times it has been tried."What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #22 January 29, 2013 QuoteI think Eric Holder, being the dirty, low down, partison, cock sucking, low life, bigoted, racist, power-grabbing, corrupt, Chicago-style, chicken-fucking, Attorney General that he is would put to shame anything you can think of. After all, this move goes against his extreme liberal agenda..... Quit holding back. Tell us what you really think.I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skypuppy 1 #23 January 29, 2013 Quote Quote I could have sworn we had a thread about this; I remember posting to it. But alas, now I can't find it in a search. I think I'm losing it. Lol well several dumbass states have introduced legislation like this Unfortunately now its my dumbass state. Fun fact: It is illegal for an employer in MO to fire you for owning a firearm. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. It is NOT illegal to be fired for sexual orientation in MO. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. Here is the email I sent her when she introduced the bill about making it illegal to be fired for owning a gun.... "Miss Brown Please step down from public service. Your complete and utter ignorance is such an insult to all of Missouri. Please please, never again cast a vote that could actually affect someones life. You should probably try something more along the lines of recycling old cans. Thanks. XXXXXX" She didn't respond ;[. My state is fcked. You expected a response to that smartass comment? She was, presumably, elected by a majority of constituents in her state. Did you vote? Then maybe you should run against her next time. If you win, you can make legislation...If some old guy can do it then obviously it can't be very extreme. Otherwise he'd already be dead. Bruce McConkey 'I thought we were gonna die, and I couldn't think of anyone Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #24 January 29, 2013 Quote Quote Quote I could have sworn we had a thread about this; I remember posting to it. But alas, now I can't find it in a search. I think I'm losing it. Lol well several dumbass states have introduced legislation like this Unfortunately now its my dumbass state. Fun fact: It is illegal for an employer in MO to fire you for owning a firearm. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. It is NOT illegal to be fired for sexual orientation in MO. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. Here is the email I sent her when she introduced the bill about making it illegal to be fired for owning a gun.... "Miss Brown Please step down from public service. Your complete and utter ignorance is such an insult to all of Missouri. Please please, never again cast a vote that could actually affect someones life. You should probably try something more along the lines of recycling old cans. Thanks. XXXXXX" She didn't respond ;[. My state is fcked. You expected a response to that smartass comment? She was, presumably, elected by a majority of constituents in her state. Did you vote? Then maybe you should run against her next time. If you win, you can make legislation... I think his commentary about Brown is perfectly reasonable. And I notice you said nothing to the other guy about all the filth he called Holder. Go away, little boy; you're not even trying. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skypuppy 1 #25 January 29, 2013 Quote Quote Quote Quote I could have sworn we had a thread about this; I remember posting to it. But alas, now I can't find it in a search. I think I'm losing it. Lol well several dumbass states have introduced legislation like this Unfortunately now its my dumbass state. Fun fact: It is illegal for an employer in MO to fire you for owning a firearm. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. It is NOT illegal to be fired for sexual orientation in MO. Thanks to Rep. Wanda Brown. Here is the email I sent her when she introduced the bill about making it illegal to be fired for owning a gun.... "Miss Brown Please step down from public service. Your complete and utter ignorance is such an insult to all of Missouri. Please please, never again cast a vote that could actually affect someones life. You should probably try something more along the lines of recycling old cans. Thanks. XXXXXX" She didn't respond ;[. My state is fcked. You expected a response to that smartass comment? She was, presumably, elected by a majority of constituents in her state. Did you vote? Then maybe you should run against her next time. If you win, you can make legislation... I think his commentary about Brown is perfectly reasonable. And I notice you said nothing to the other guy about all the filth he called Holder. Go away, little boy; you're not even trying. Not at all. He sent a message to Brown and then complained when she didn't reply to his obvious baiting. The other poster simply gave us his opinion of Holder, which may or may not be true. But I'm pretty sure he wasn't asking Holder a question.If some old guy can do it then obviously it can't be very extreme. Otherwise he'd already be dead. Bruce McConkey 'I thought we were gonna die, and I couldn't think of anyone Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites