He proposed it, before he said he would veto any bill getting rid of it, followed by he denided proposing it before he was against it before admiting he did proposed it
By
rushmc, in Speakers Corner
Recommended Posts
QuoteThe sequester Are you confused? BTW, it started Saturday morningand the sun came up We needabouta dozen more sequesters Go Obama http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/sperling-admits-obama-misled-debate-president-did-propose-sequester_705015.html
It's tha old saying; 'If, you can't beat 'em... confuse 'em!'
or my favorite... 'If, you can'r dazzle 'em with brilliance... baff;e 'em with bull-shit!'
Chuck
kallend 2,027
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
rushmc 23
can't be. I support Obama's sequesterQuote
ODS strikes again.
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
billvon 2,998
Give it a few months. Once the economic problems it causes are over, you'll deny that Obama had anything to do with the spending cut.
brenthutch 444
Quote
ODS strikes again.
Will you support the Keystone pipeline if Obama approves it? Or does CO2 only have an impact if it is Republican CO2? Or, as I suspect you are suffering from ODS as well.
rushmc 23
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
QuoteCutting a small part of the increase is going to cause problems? Really? You truly believe that?
Just give it a few months and the lefties will begin blowing every little inconvenience into a major catastrophe.
1969912 0
"Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ."
-NickDG
QuoteI wonder if any of the "cuts" impact the Free Shit Army.
They will gladly support cuts in free shit as long as they can blame it on Republicans.
rhaig 0
QuoteQuoteCutting a small part of the increase is going to cause problems? Really? You truly believe that?
Just give it a few months and the lefties will begin blowing every little inconvenience into a major catastrophe.
It's now either the cause of:
Bush
Fracking
Sequester
what did I miss?
Rob
Bolas 5
If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh.
rushmc 23
QuoteQuoteCutting a small part of the increase is going to cause problems? Really? You truly believe that?
Just give it a few months and the lefties will begin blowing every little inconvenience into a major catastrophe.
That blame has already started it
How else will he explain the current economy away on the republicans
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Andy9o8 2
QuoteI wonder if any of the "cuts" impact the Free Shit Army.
Not even a drop in the bucket compared to the Unlimited Welfare US military.
QuoteThe sequester
Are you confused?
BTW, it started Saturday morning and the sun came up
We need about a dozen more sequesters
Go Obama
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/sperling-admits-obama-misled-debate-president-did-propose-sequester_705015.html
Your high-school English teacher must be stabbing herself in the face.
oldwomanc6 52
Not even a drop in the bucket compared to the Unlimited Welfare US military.
Care to elucidate?
![[:/] [:/]](/uploads/emoticons/dry.png)
![>:( >:(](/uploads/emoticons/angry.png)
It sure sounds like you're dissing the service members, and what is the "welfare" part of it?
WSCR 594
FB 1023
CBDB 9
Ian
oldwomanc6 52
QuoteNo, he's dissing the Industrial Military Complex - totally different than dissing our fine servicemen and woman.
Ian
And the Welfare part?
WSCR 594
FB 1023
CBDB 9
You appear to be missing his point.
Edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex
oldwomanc6 52
Evidently
WSCR 594
FB 1023
CBDB 9
wolfriverjoe 1,523
QuoteQuoteNo, he's dissing the Industrial Military Complex - totally different than dissing our fine servicemen and woman.
Ian
And the Welfare part?
The "Welfare Part" is that the military gets each and every nifty neato new toy that they ask for. Whether they actually need it or not (and whether the soldiers on the ground actually asked for it or not).
The real beneficairies of this are not the troops. The real winners are the defense contractors.
"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo
oldwomanc6 52
QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, he's dissing the Industrial Military Complex - totally different than dissing our fine servicemen and woman.
Ian
And the Welfare part?
The "Welfare Part" is that the military gets each and every nifty neato new toy that they ask for Whether they actually need it or not (and whether the soldiers on the ground actually asked for it or not).
I don't think they are given nearly what they want, barely what they need.
The real beneficairies of this are not the troops.
I will agree
the real winners are the defense contractors.
Possibly.
WSCR 594
FB 1023
CBDB 9
dudeist skydiver # 3105
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites