Gravitymaster 0 #126 May 22, 2013 kallend****** Let's recap: The targeting took place under a commissioner who was a Bush appointee. The Inspector General, a Bush appointee, who exposed it said the actions originated within the IRS. Seems like a lot of GOP smoke and no fire here. Ah... so it's all Bush's fault. You may conclude that. In the absence of any evidence of WH involvement, one way or the other, I couldn't comment. Yeah and John Gotti never ordered a hit? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #127 May 22, 2013 kallend****** Let's recap: The targeting took place under a commissioner who was a Bush appointee. The Inspector General, a Bush appointee, who exposed it said the actions originated within the IRS. Seems like a lot of GOP smoke and no fire here. Ah... so it's all Bush's fault. You may conclude that. In the absence of any evidence of WH involvement, one way or the other, I couldn't comment. It is already reported the senior WH staff knew earlier this year (at the latest)"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomerdog 0 #128 May 22, 2013 I don't disagree with you but your proposals don't go far enough IMHO. How about a flat tax. I'll gladly give our favorite uncle 10% and the state I live in 3%. This can all be deducted from my salary. At the end of the year, fill out a simple form, report the numbers...it should not take even 15 minutes and mail the return in. The flatter the tax the better, then of course we're going to put H&R Block, CPA's and the rest of the usual suspects out of a job. New paradigms bring new situations. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomerdog 0 #129 May 22, 2013 IRS Commissioners serve a five year term to overlap into the next administration. Using the IRS to hassle and silence political opponents has been used since FDR was President to include Senators and Members of Congress from BOTH parties. Here's the bottom line, it stops and it stops now. I expect that there are conservatives and liberals posting in this forum. I don't have a problem with that whatsoever, our origins began with debate and debate continues to this day. No one should fear their government coming after them using the IRS. In the end, however, the blame lies in large with us. We wen't paying attention and we believed this stuff happens to someone else. We are now at a point where IRS intimidation via the imprimatur of our elected leaders has made its way to Main Street on a level too many of us never thought or imagined. The day "we the people" fear the government rather than the converse is a day we need to take serious pause. Eternal vigilance IS the price of freedom...vigilance on the powers that be outside AND inside. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #130 May 22, 2013 wmw999My thought is that the presence of those Bush appointees means that it really is more likely a localized stupid & potentially political decision, rather than a Svengali-ish national one. No, it's not Bush's fault. Wendy P. Quade, and now you, have made the claim that low level IRS people did this Well, the very first link in this thread said that is not the case Now this You (IMO) care I dont believe Quade does http://www.fox19.com/story/22380127/reality-check-exclusive-cincinnati-agent-giving-orders-in-irs-scandal And this http://cnsnews.com/news/article/irs-misses-filing-deadline-fails-comply-congressional-demand-all-communications-wh"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #131 May 22, 2013 rushmc***My thought is that the presence of those Bush appointees means that it really is more likely a localized stupid & potentially political decision, rather than a Svengali-ish national one. No, it's not Bush's fault. Wendy P. Quade, and now you, have made the claim that low level IRS people did this Well, the very first link in this thread said that is not the case It is quite clear that you either don't read, or don't understand, the articles that you link to,... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #132 May 22, 2013 Well Either the focus groups are showing the Dems this IRS scandal is a big deal or They know of some info about to come out and they have to be on the correct side of this Cause now even the Dems are turning on the IRS Gotta wonder what is coming now"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #133 May 22, 2013 rushmcWell Either the focus groups are showing the Dems this IRS scandal is a big deal or They know of some info about to come out and they have to be on the correct side of this Cause now even the Dems are turning on the IRS NOW? Have you been asleep for a week or so?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #134 May 31, 2013 Getting deeper http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/31/IRS-Went-After-More-Than-The-Tea-Party"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #135 May 31, 2013 rushmcGetting deeper http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/31/IRS-Went-After-More-Than-The-Tea-Party Old news.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #136 May 31, 2013 kallend***Getting deeper http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/31/IRS-Went-After-More-Than-The-Tea-Party Old news. Not for the low information voter So, you are ok with the IRS limiting free speech? Never mind I know you are ok with that under certain liberal choices"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #137 May 31, 2013 rushmc******Getting deeper http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/31/IRS-Went-After-More-Than-The-Tea-Party Old news. Not for the low information voter So, you are ok with the IRS limiting free speech? Never mind I know you are ok with that under certain liberal choices If you paid attention and read stuff BEFORE hitting "post" you'd know my position. You should try it sometime.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #138 June 2, 2013 Like this is a surprise Quote Interviews with IRS agent suggest Tea Party targeting came from Washington http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/02/interviews-with-irs-agent-suggest-tea-party-targeting-came-from-washington/"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nanook 1 #139 June 3, 2013 BoomerdogI don't disagree with you but your proposals don't go far enough IMHO. How about a flat tax. I'll gladly give our favorite uncle 10% and the state I live in 3%. This can all be deducted from my salary. At the end of the year, fill out a simple form, report the numbers...it should not take even 15 minutes and mail the return in. The flatter the tax the better, then of course we're going to put H&R Block, CPA's and the rest of the usual suspects out of a job. New paradigms bring new situations. How? This only explains wage earners. How about business men and other owners? People who live off of unearned income? Someone has to make sure they pay their dues, and the right amount. How about people with combination of both types of income? Foreign income?_____________________________ "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine" - Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LyraM45 0 #140 June 3, 2013 rushmc Like this is a surprise Quote Interviews with IRS agent suggest Tea Party targeting came from Washington http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/02/interviews-with-irs-agent-suggest-tea-party-targeting-came-from-washington/ Fox News trying to focus blame on administration? No-- I don't believe it! Sounds like the agent feels like he was being thrown under the bus, so he's doing it back. Who knows what's really going on, honestly.Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #141 June 3, 2013 LyraM45 ***Like this is a surprise Quote Interviews with IRS agent suggest Tea Party targeting came from Washington http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/02/interviews-with-irs-agent-suggest-tea-party-targeting-came-from-washington/ Fox News trying to focus blame on administration? No-- I don't believe it! Sounds like the agent feels like he was being thrown under the bus, so he's doing it back. Who knows what's really going on, honestly. One thing is for sure This is bigger than a couple of off the rail agents I blame it on the IRS Any admin can use this dept to hassel people they do not like This way of taxing needs to go away But it will not happen because there is too much power for washington to lose No matter which party is in power"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #142 June 3, 2013 QuoteThis way of taxing needs to go away If you're saying that special tax exempt status for political organizations needs to go away, then I agree. Is that what you're saying? - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #143 June 3, 2013 DanGQuoteThis way of taxing needs to go away If you're saying that special tax exempt status for political organizations needs to go away, then I agree. Is that what you're saying? No I am saying a way of taxing that eliminates the need for an IRS"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #144 June 3, 2013 QuoteI am saying a way of taxing that eliminates the need for an IRS Impossible. Unless you get rid of all Federal taxes, they'll always be a need for someone to collect whatever taxes we have on the books. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #145 June 3, 2013 DanGQuoteThis way of taxing needs to go away If you're saying that special tax exempt status for political organizations needs to go away, then I agree. Is that what you're saying? I'm sorry, did you say that any kind of special tax status (either positive or negative) for ALL organizations needs to go away? I agree ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #146 June 3, 2013 rehmwa***QuoteThis way of taxing needs to go away If you're saying that special tax exempt status for political organizations needs to go away, then I agree. Is that what you're saying? I'm sorry, did you say that any kind of special tax status (either positive or negative) for ALL organizations needs to go away? I agree As a step, I would too. However, the left does not consider unions political and they would still be able to give money to the Dems But, if he means ALL orgs of all kinds. The playing field is closer to equal. It would be a good start"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #147 June 3, 2013 DanGQuoteThis way of taxing needs to go away If you're saying that special tax exempt status for political organizations needs to go away, then I agree. Is that what you're saying? Again, if you say just eliminate the code for everyone, I agree Here is an example of one such group http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/02/Evangelical-Group-Pushing-Immigration-Doesnt-Legally-Exist But, in keeping with this thread, there is yet to be one example of a non-conservative group being delayed, or being asked to sign a form stating they will not picket planned parenthood offices related to getting the aproval"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #148 June 3, 2013 QuoteI'm sorry, did you say that any kind of special tax status (either positive or negative) for ALL organizations needs to go away? Yes, that's what I'm saying. And I've said it before. The problem is that it will never happen since both sides (not just the left as rushmc seems to think) have pet organizations they will claim are "special". - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livendive 8 #149 June 3, 2013 rehmwa I'm sorry, did you say that any kind of special tax status (either positive or negative) for ALL organizations needs to go away? I agree Word. Blues, Dave"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!" (drink Mountain Dew) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #150 June 3, 2013 QuoteHowever, the left does not consider unions political and they would still be able to give money to the Dems Both sides are the same, but I know it's not possible for you to make a post without a partisan dig. This scandal is not about the ability to give money to a cause. It's about the ability to do it tax free and without having to disclose your donors. That's what the organizations investigated by the IRS wanted, not just the ability to operate in the political arena, but to do so while enjoying special tax free status. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites