0
quade

Alex Jones Shows Off His Newest Tin-Foil Fashion

Recommended Posts

Quote

I guess these people just make up tin foil had Ideas and conjure up such limitations just in case it does happens one day.



They didn't conjure it up. The idea already existed, but an idea does not equal a viable method.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear

All talk no substance.



Says the man who has spoken much but said little.

Support your claim with credible evidence, otherwise there is nothing to discuss.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear

Quote

Did you notice how your linked search doesn't return any credible sources?



In your opinion or who's? Do you believe the default position is necessarily the correct one?



You would be hard pressed to find any real researcher who would accept those linked sites as credible sources of information.

The default position is just that, default. It is certainly open for questioning if credible evidence supporting an alternate conclusion is provided. In this case, you haven't provided any credible support for your claim.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear

Show me one that concludes weather weapons do not exist!



The onus is on you to show that they do exist. I don't need to show their non-existence any more than I need to prove that unicorns don't exist. There has been no evidence provided to suggest they do exist.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear

Show me one that concludes weather weapons do not exist!

And credible.

I have shown you the guy that basically invented it.



And H.G. Wells invented anti-gravity and the time machine. Seen many of them around?
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Actually the default position is that it can be done

No, the default position is that you cannot do something until you prove you can.

For example, you could claim that you can jump 100 miles in the air. Is that impossible? No. But until you do it, the default position is that people cannot jump 100 miles in the air.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Additionally, before a person claims they've hit a home run, they probably ought to be in the ball park.

The difference between cloud seeding an the ability to steer or create an F5 tornado is perhaps a dozen orders of magnitude in terms of required energy.

Billvon's example of someone claiming a person has the ability to jump 100 miles is too small of a comparison.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

***Show me one that concludes weather weapons do not exist!

And credible.

I have shown you the guy that basically invented it.



And H.G. Wells invented anti-gravity and the time machine. Seen many of them around?

Of course not, they've all been parked in last wednesday. :|
You are playing chicken with a planet - you can't dodge and planets don't blink. Act accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your lack of comprehension astounds me.

That goes for pretty much everyone that has replied.

I have not said once that 'I know' it is possible to create a tornado.

I have simply said is naive to suggest it is impossible.

This my own agnostic standpoint and it is something I am comfortable with. Nothing any of you have said suggests otherwise.

You foolishly suggest it is only possible to create isolated drizzle for example, when it is clear this is not the case.

You move your position without explanation.

Nobody is sure that creating a Tornado is impossible. Therefore nobody is sure it cannot be done or is not already being done. Many weapons that are banned are still being used. Why would there necessarily be public evidence of them.

None of your rationales make sense.

To be so sure, one would have to know everything and this is impossible even though I am sure many of you would argue against that.

LOL.

There is so much ignorance in this thread I am not going to participate any more. It is not worth the energy. Know it all's will never admit defeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe next he'll lecture us on 9/11 nanothermite. Or maybe it's time for another "income tax is illegal" rant. If we're really lucky he'll go straight to crop circles or mind control.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kennedy

Maybe next he'll lecture us on 9/11 nanothermite.



You know, I'd actually pay more attention to the 9/11 videos on youtube if they weren't all like 2 hours long... Less is more, people!!

Quote

If we're really lucky he'll go straight to crop circles or mind control.



Well duh. Clearly the hurricanes were created so they could, in turn, create the crop circles. Anyone who denies this is clearly having their mind controlled by the government - via fluoride or chemtrails, you pick... :P
You are playing chicken with a planet - you can't dodge and planets don't blink. Act accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Please, Please, PLEASE don't bring up element number 9. I am so freaking sick of hearing ignorant fuckwits spouting off about subjects outside their knowledge and far beyond their understanding.
witty subliminal message
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm not sure he's trolling. He might actually believe this shit.



Really after explaining 3 times you still do not understand that I have never once suggested that I necessarily believe it.

Are you people really that stupid? Or are you simply not willing to accept any opinion other than your own.

If you would actually address my points you might have a debate but until then you idiots (plural no personal attack) are simply trolls.

No wonder our world is fucked, it is full of idiots like you lot.

hypocrites.

Good bye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stated? No. Suggested? You betcha. The sources you've used for your argument that this level of weather control is in fact possible (I trust I'm correctly assessing that as your position? That regardless of whether it's being done, it's capable of being done with current technology?), are a combination of hearsay and conjecture. It's been stated (accurately) that the physics just don't work. Each of your points HAVE been addressed, you just didn't like it when everyone shot you down. Poor thing. Oh well. We'll miss you! ;)

You are playing chicken with a planet - you can't dodge and planets don't blink. Act accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0