quade 4 #151 June 1, 2013 Quote'Maybe' an electric motor is a good comparison, they have the ability to create electricity and input of electricity also increases their energy output and RPM. No. It's actually a silly comparison since the electricity made in a thunderstorm is static electricity and lightning detection is a standard part of weather detection. If, as you suggest, electricity is going to increase the RPM of a storm, then what, EXACTLY is it pushing against? Motors work because the electricity you put into them induce a magnetic field, that magnetic field pushes against the magnets in the motor. What magnets are there in a thunderstorm? And if it's so powerful it can increase the RPM of a thunderstorm, why isn't it playing havoc with compasses? Certainly that wouldn't have gone unnoticed. Again, this is an issue of scale and magnitude. Thunderstorms have existed as long as water vapor has existed on this planet. They are the result of huge amounts of energy lifting huge amounts of moisture into the air. The friction of which creates huge amounts of static electricity capable of creating gamma ray bursts. They do it all over the planet all by themselves without any additional input from humans required. The strongest radio signal you could possibly make and direct anywhere is insignificant in comparison. How you could possibly hide that signal and not have the entire scientific community know about it is also ridiculous.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mistercwood 287 #152 June 1, 2013 Dude. Obviously they worked out how to hide it - they've already got the tech to manipulate the weather, once that part's worked out then hiding that input would be peanuts. Duh! You are playing chicken with a planet - you can't dodge and planets don't blink. Act accordingly. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #153 June 1, 2013 I think your tinfoil is too tight. It seems to be cutting off blood flow.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #154 June 1, 2013 QuoteIf, as you suggest, electricity is going to increase the RPM of a storm, Er, was it not clear that I found it interesting and somehow relvant, and started my comment with a hyphenated "maybe'? How about the readings coming from the sensors, and the current fatal tornadoes going on? is that all hoax as well? I have not looked into it enough to say for sure know which way I inclined to swing. I just thought it was interesting and is worth consideration. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GeorgiaDon 379 #155 June 1, 2013 Quote And if it's so powerful it can increase the RPM of a thunderstorm, why isn't it playing havoc with compasses? Certainly that wouldn't have gone unnoticed. In a magnetic field that strong, everyone within the metropolitan Oklahoma City area with a pacemaker would have fallen over dead. Certainly that wouldn't have gone unnoticed. Don_____________________________________ Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996) “Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,064 #156 June 1, 2013 >HAARP was targeting downtown Oklahoma City today, precisely where the latest >severe tornado outbreak has occurred tonight. HAARP location: Alaska Maximum power output: 3.6 megawatts Power in a single lighting strike: 1-5 gigawatts (1000-5000 megawatts) Number of lighting strikes in a medium thunderstorm - 500 to 1000 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #157 June 1, 2013 Oh, but "maybe"... (Snicker)quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,559 #158 June 1, 2013 Quote HAARP was targeting downtown Oklahoma City today, precisely where the latest severe tornado outbreak has occurred tonight. This was also the case with last weeks tornadoes, also in Oklahoma. HAARP is targeting OK City? I didn't know you could see OK from Alaska. Russia, sure, but not Oklahoma(What a great way to convince gullible idiots to listen to your crackpot theories - predict tornadoes, in tornado season, in the most tornado prone place in the country. It must be the government!!!1!)Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ayevee8toryear 0 #159 June 2, 2013 QuoteHAARP location: Alaska Which one? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kennedy 0 #160 June 2, 2013 There's only one Alaska. Unless you have a conspiracy theory about that, too.witty subliminal message Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards. 1* Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
