quade 4 #1 September 9, 2013 Quote(CNN) -- The combination of a gun and a surprise gone wrong left a beloved 18-year-old track star dead, authorities in Longmont, Colorado, say. Premila Lal jumped out of a closet as a harmless joke to surprise a family friend, her father says. But the noise startled the friend, who grabbed a gun and shot her. Source: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/08/justice/colorado-teen-accidental-shooting/index.html Playing "scare" pranks is simply not a good idea, even less so when the person you're "pranking" is within reach of a gun.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jailbot 0 #2 September 9, 2013 quade Playing "scare" pranks is simply not a good idea, even less so when the person you're "pranking" is within reach of a gun. Or perhaps the first instinct shouldn't be to go for a fucking kill shot. "Galley has been charged with reckless endangerment, child abuse and providing a gun to a juvenile because Lal's 15-year-old brother had access to the gun, police say." Because you know, this guy seems responsible. Shoot first ask questions later is why things like this happen. Either draw your firearm and try to figure out the situation, or throw a punch if you feel the need for immediate reaction. If there is a weapon involved, it's a different story, but you can't argue there wasn't enough time to figure out this situation before she was shot. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #3 September 9, 2013 jailbotOr perhaps the first instinct shouldn't be to go for a fucking kill shot. I'm fairly certain that IS going to be the first instinct; grab a weapon, stop the (perceived) bad thing from happening. With a gun in hand, that's going to be a shot to the center of the mass. A guy walking down Hogan's Alley is prepared to make a decision to shoot or not shoot. A guy in his house, might not take the time.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #4 September 9, 2013 "A guy in his house, might not take the time. "Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devildog 0 #5 September 9, 2013 If you're going to shoot, shoot to kill. Any other advice is just awful.You stop breathing for a few minutes and everyone jumps to conclusions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #6 September 9, 2013 quadeQuote(CNN) -- The combination of a gun and a surprise gone wrong left a beloved 18-year-old track star dead, authorities in Longmont, Colorado, say. Premila Lal jumped out of a closet as a harmless joke to surprise a family friend, her father says. But the noise startled the friend, who grabbed a gun and shot her. Source: http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/08/justice/colorado-teen-accidental-shooting/index.html Playing "scare" pranks is simply not a good idea, even less so when the person you're "pranking" is within reach of a gun. Such a sad mischaracterization Paul It is not surprising at all I know you and your gun control crowd would LOVE this to happen more often Just to move your agenda forward And at the cost of a life no less The real head line should note that this is rare and a surprise Why? Because the majority of the gun owners are responsible Another fact that makes you mad In the end, only those who think like you are surprised Me? I am saddened. It did not need to happen But that is not the fault of the gun"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Darius11 12 #7 September 9, 2013 Damn she was hot......BAN GUNS!!!! Accidents happen, sad but true. NEXTI'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." - Kurt Cobain Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #8 September 9, 2013 jailbot*** Playing "scare" pranks is simply not a good idea, even less so when the person you're "pranking" is within reach of a gun. Or perhaps the first instinct shouldn't be to go for a fucking kill shot. "Galley has been charged with reckless endangerment, child abuse and providing a gun to a juvenile because Lal's 15-year-old brother had access to the gun, police say." Because you know, this guy seems responsible. Shoot first ask questions later is why things like this happen. Either draw your firearm and try to figure out the situation, or throw a punch if you feel the need for immediate reaction. If there is a weapon involved, it's a different story, but you can't argue there wasn't enough time to figure out this situation before she was shot. First off No reputable trainer would ever teach "shot to kill' You are taught to aim center mass and stop only when the threat is stopped Shot to kill is just a sound bite used to stir shit up"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #9 September 9, 2013 QuoteOr perhaps the first instinct shouldn't be to go for a fucking kill shot. Hollywood thinking, pure Hollywood thinking. No agency trains to 'shoot to wound'. It is next to impossible and stupid to boot. Quotebut you can't argue there wasn't enough time to figure out this situation before she was shot. And if it was a rapist that raped and killed her.... Would you still claim there was enough time? This is a stupid accident. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #10 September 9, 2013 "The only surprise is that it doesn't happen more often. " Yet it does not... So it should be seen as what it is... A Stupid accident, not a way to gain support for something that has been shown not to be a statistically significant problem. Fact is that you should not be surprised it does not happen more often.... Because historically it has *not* happened often. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #11 September 9, 2013 >Fact is that you should not be surprised it does not happen more often.... Because >historically it has *not* happened often. On the average about 120 children a year are killed accidentally by guns. One every three days. The only reason this one made the news is that it was an especially sad story. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #12 September 9, 2013 QuoteOn the average about 120 children a year are killed accidentally by guns. One every three days. The only reason this one made the news is that it was an especially sad story. "From 2005-2009, there were an average of 3,533 fatal unintentional drownings (non-boating related) annually in the United States — about ten deaths per day. An additional 347 people died each year from drowning in boating-related incidents." 120 < 3,533 Every year more than 500 kids die in bike accidents. http://ymiclassroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GetInGear.pdf 120 < 500 So statistically a kid is more likely to die by drowning or by riding a bike than by gun shot. Not saying this is not a terrible accident... But each of those deaths are also terrible accidents and if you wanted to save lives you would ask for more bike regulations... Maybe even a ban. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #13 September 9, 2013 >But each of those deaths are also terrible accidents and if you wanted to save lives >you would ask for more bike regulations... Maybe even a ban. Would you support a gun and bike ban? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #14 September 9, 2013 neither guns nor bikes should be banned. The only reason this one made the news was someone thought they could politicize it more. "evil man trying to defend himself kills innocent prankster"-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #15 September 9, 2013 >neither guns nor bikes should be banned. Agreed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #16 September 9, 2013 rhaigThe only reason this one made the news was someone thought they could politicize it more. "evil man trying to defend himself kills innocent prankster" So, you believe a headline reading, "Man Bites Dog" would be politicizing . . . what?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #17 September 9, 2013 DaVinciQuoteOn the average about 120 children a year are killed accidentally by guns. One every three days. The only reason this one made the news is that it was an especially sad story. "From 2005-2009, there were an average of 3,533 fatal unintentional drownings (non-boating related) annually in the United States — about ten deaths per day. An additional 347 people died each year from drowning in boating-related incidents." 120 < 3,533 Every year more than 500 kids die in bike accidents. http://ymiclassroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GetInGear.pdf 120 < 500 . Didn't realize we had a contest in the USA to see which method killed the most kids.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #18 September 9, 2013 rhaigneither guns nor bikes should be banned. The only reason this one made the news was someone thought they could politicize it more. "evil man trying to defend himself kills innocent prankster" +1"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #19 September 9, 2013 Yep. This makes news. A kid gets shot and killed. But this is Longmont. It's different. Somehow I think it is viewed as more senseless than the people getting killed every day in inner cities. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #20 September 9, 2013 kallend***QuoteOn the average about 120 children a year are killed accidentally by guns. One every three days. The only reason this one made the news is that it was an especially sad story. "From 2005-2009, there were an average of 3,533 fatal unintentional drownings (non-boating related) annually in the United States — about ten deaths per day. An additional 347 people died each year from drowning in boating-related incidents." 120 < 3,533 Every year more than 500 kids die in bike accidents. http://ymiclassroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GetInGear.pdf 120 < 500 . Didn't realize we had a contest in the USA to see which method killed the most kids. dont know about the killing kids contest(s) But your post is proof that a stupid post contest is still ongoing"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #21 September 9, 2013 quade***The only reason this one made the news was someone thought they could politicize it more. "evil man trying to defend himself kills innocent prankster" So, you believe a headline reading, "Man Bites Dog" would be politicizing . . . what? If you don't believe a story about a man defending himself with a gun and tragically killing a prankster can be politicized, then you are out of touch with pro/anti-gun arguments being made, or being intentionally obtuse.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #22 September 9, 2013 kallend***QuoteOn the average about 120 children a year are killed accidentally by guns. One every three days. The only reason this one made the news is that it was an especially sad story. "From 2005-2009, there were an average of 3,533 fatal unintentional drownings (non-boating related) annually in the United States — about ten deaths per day. An additional 347 people died each year from drowning in boating-related incidents." 120 < 3,533 Every year more than 500 kids die in bike accidents. http://ymiclassroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GetInGear.pdf 120 < 500 . Didn't realize we had a contest in the USA to see which method killed the most kids. You're such a political animal. You've been hanging out with the Hollywood types too much lately. You support further restrictions on gun ownership, yet you haven't made any public outcry for the further restrictions on minors riding bicycles, or swimming pool safety regulation. I won't call you a hypocrite. I don't think that is your intention. But you appear to be more concerned with a highly politicized topic rather than actually concerned about the safety of children.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #23 September 9, 2013 QuoteYou are taught to aim center mass and stop only when the threat is stopped Which is the lawyer version of: Keep pulling the trigger until you are very sure he won't be getting up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,446 #24 September 9, 2013 Quote"From 2005-2009, there were an average of 3,533 fatal unintentional drownings (non-boating related) annually in the United States — about ten deaths per day. An additional 347 people died each year from drowning in boating-related incidents." 120 < 3,533 Every year more than 500 kids die in bike accidents. http://ymiclassroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/GetInGear.pdf 120 < 500 So statistically a kid is more likely to die by drowning or by riding a bike than by gun shot. And I'd say that depends on how many kids are in each set: kids+guns kids+bikes kids+water (according to the CDC 20% are children) After all, few would say that skydiving is more dangerous BASE jumping, but I believe worldwide deaths from skydiving exceed those from BASE jumping. That said, this incident is incredibly sad. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaVinci 0 #25 September 9, 2013 Quote>But each of those deaths are also terrible accidents and if you wanted to save lives >you would ask for more bike regulations... Maybe even a ban. Would you support a gun and bike ban? No, but you have suggested support for gun bans... Even though bikes and swimming kill more children each and every day. I also would not support mandatory bike locks. I would not support background checks to own bikes nor skill tests that would have to be passed before you could own a bike (Skills test to ride it on the street? Sure as long as it is actually something that could be passed). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites