Stumpy 284 #251 September 25, 2013 I don't think it's confined to April..... Birthers are hilariousNever try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #252 September 25, 2013 For god knows what reason I'm actually going to try and be helpful here: QuoteMy wife had an expired passport, HS Diploma, marriage certificates, death certificate of first husband in addition to valid FL DL. None of this was acceptable because of the discrepancy on her BC. Wrong. None of those were acceptable because none of them are acceptable forms of primary ID. Full stop. The birth certificate had nothing to do with it. Ron, you do realise that if she still has the expired passport in good condition she can renew it for 60 bucks and the cost of postage and a photo? And that an unexpired passport is an acceptable form of primary ID? And that you could have, and maybe still could, bypass the whole fuck up, save yourself over $900 and not involve the birth certificate in any way?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 803 #253 September 25, 2013 Just a few. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 803 #254 September 25, 2013 Oh snap - I missed the word April in your post. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #255 September 25, 2013 StumpyI don't think it's confined to April..... Birthers are hilarious Actually, the original "birthers" were the Clintons. http://deadlinelive.info/2012/04/01/did-ex-prez-bill-clinton-say-obama-was-ineligible/Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #256 September 25, 2013 rickjump1 ***I don't think it's confined to April..... Birthers are hilarious Actually, the original "birthers" were the Clintons. http://deadlinelive.info/2012/04/01/did-ex-prez-bill-clinton-say-obama-was-ineligible/ Ok, yeah, that could be the case. Or maybe, just maybe, the woman telling that story is looney-tunes, whacked out, bat-shit fucking insane. Quote She claimed, however, that Bill Clinton’s intention to unequivocally state to the public that Obama was ineligible was stopped in its tracks by the murder of a close friend of the Clintons... Viviano said a campaign staffer who was close to Hillary, whose name she requested be withheld for security reasons, told her Gwatney’s murder was a message to Bill Clinton. “I was told by this person that that was ‘Shutupsville, or you’re next,’” she said.... “And then,” Viviano said, paraphrasing the staffer, “they went in and said, ‘OK, it’s your daughter, now, we’ll go after.’ You know, maybe.(But seriously, keep going. Everything you're saying right now is awesome!)Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rickjump1 0 #257 September 26, 2013 If it's not American movie stars, it's American presidents for you Brits. It must be boring living in an old museum like the UK. No wonder Aunt Hilda left Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #258 September 26, 2013 It's American idiots that keep me entertained. What do you think about the links that have been posted in response to your claims in the last few pages? Does it make you realise that everything you've posted is a regurgitated lie, or is it all just water off a ducks back?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #259 September 26, 2013 Actually, I think that those that voted or McCain in the primaries were the low informtion uninformed voter The rest just flowed from there As for you My comments are more general than specific There are many who vote for someone based on them taking the time to learn about a candidate and then voting Saddly those people are clearly in the minority The majority makes decsions based on network sound bites You believe you are not one of these people Fine I have no idea and we most likely just disagree But If this is the case, why are you allowing yourself to be insulted?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #260 September 26, 2013 jakeeIt's American idiots that keep me entertained. What do you think about the links that have been posted in response to your claims in the last few pages? Does it make you realise that everything you've posted is a regurgitated lie, or is it all just water off a ducks back? www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4539068;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;;page=unread#unread... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LyraM45 0 #261 September 26, 2013 rushmcActually, I think that those that voted or McCain in the primaries were the low informtion uninformed voter The rest just flowed from there As for you My comments are more general than specific There are many who vote for someone based on them taking the time to learn about a candidate and then voting Saddly those people are clearly in the minority The majority makes decsions based on network sound bites You believe you are not one of these people Fine I have no idea and we most likely just disagree But If this is the case, why are you allowing yourself to be insulted? Not that I am directly insulted and too bothered, but rather pointing out you are insulting an awful lot of people if I understood what you were saying correctly.Apologies for the spelling (and grammar).... I got a B.S, not a B.A. :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 803 #262 September 26, 2013 I thought the same thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #263 September 26, 2013 LyraM45***Actually, I think that those that voted or McCain in the primaries were the low informtion uninformed voter The rest just flowed from there As for you My comments are more general than specific There are many who vote for someone based on them taking the time to learn about a candidate and then voting Saddly those people are clearly in the minority The majority makes decsions based on network sound bites You believe you are not one of these people Fine I have no idea and we most likely just disagree But If this is the case, why are you allowing yourself to be insulted? Not that I am directly insulted and too bothered, but rather pointing out you are insulting an awful lot of people if I understood what you were saying correctly. Remember, the context for this was that Palin hurt McCain Research shows that is not the case regardless of what the media and the left say"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #264 September 26, 2013 QuoteRemember, the context for this was that Palin hurt McCain Research shows that is not the case I'd like to see that.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #265 September 26, 2013 http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/69_of_gop_voters_say_palin_helped_mccain http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_presidential_candidacy_of_Sarah_Palin Go down to the link for the 60 polls in this one http://usconservatives.about.com/b/2012/07/17/no-sarah-palin-did-not-cost-mccain-the-presidency.htm http://althouse.blogspot.com/2008/09/zogby-has-mccainpalin-pulling-ahead-and.html this one refers to CNN exit polls http://conservatives4palin.com/2012/08/unbiased-expert-palin-helped-mccain.html"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #266 September 26, 2013 So 60+% of people who voted for her thought she helped. That's awesome "research".Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #267 September 26, 2013 RemsterSo 60+% of people who voted for her thought she helped. That's awesome "research". Read just one huh Now THAT is awsome research"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #268 September 26, 2013 None of that actually says what you think it says. Take the first one for instance, it's a poll of people who did actually vote for McCain/Palin when the question is about how many people were put off McCain because of Palin. Or the Zogby one, if you check the date it was from early september 2008. 2 months before the election, 3 weeks before the Palin / Couric interviews. The one of from conservatives4Palin I'm not going to touch for obvious reasons... Leaving the one from USConservatives saying that Palin did not cost McCain the election. I could accept that - McCain may well have lost anyway... but it still doesn't say Palin helped. But if you do have some research which genuinely backs up the claim you're making, I'd still like to see it.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 30 #269 September 26, 2013 rushmc***So 60+% of people who voted for her thought she helped. That's awesome "research". Read just one huh Now THAT is awsome research I read a few (3 of your links to be exact). Enough to see the BS.Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #270 September 26, 2013 Dont be so lazy Would you believe the Washington(com)post? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/14/AR2010101404794.html"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #271 September 26, 2013 Remster******So 60+% of people who voted for her thought she helped. That's awesome "research". Read just one huh Now THAT is awsome research I read a few (3 of your links to be exact). Enough to see the BS. I doubt it Many of the links use CNN exits polling That polling shows at the very worse, Palin did not HURT McCain It show she helped him"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #272 September 26, 2013 rushmcDont be so lazy Would you believe the Washington(com)post? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/14/AR2010101404794.html Matthew Continetti is opinion editor of the Weekly Standard* and the author of "The Persecution of Sarah Palin: How the Elite Media Tried to Bring Down a Rising Star." * Currently edited by founder William Kristol and Fred Barnes, the Standard has been described as a "redoubt of neoconservatism" and as "the neo-con bible". (Wiki) I don't think it's a question of whether I believe the Washington Post...Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #273 September 26, 2013 how about this http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p6 the interesting thing about this one is, how many opinions are shown to be wrong today Like, well, just look at it"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #274 September 26, 2013 jakee***Dont be so lazy Would you believe the Washington(com)post? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/14/AR2010101404794.html Matthew Continetti is opinion editor of the Weekly Standard* and the author of "The Persecution of Sarah Palin: How the Elite Media Tried to Bring Down a Rising Star." * Currently edited by founder William Kristol and Fred Barnes, the Standard has been described as a "redoubt of neoconservatism" and as "the neo-con bible". (Wiki) I don't think it's a question of whether I believe the Washington Post... The did try and bring her down Just look back at posts on this forum and look at the viseral bs that came from those who swallowed the media bs Now, you can cherry pick all you like But the CNN one I just sent you shows she did not hurt McCain at worst"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #275 September 26, 2013 rushmc ******Dont be so lazy Would you believe the Washington(com)post? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/14/AR2010101404794.html Matthew Continetti is opinion editor of the Weekly Standard* and the author of "The Persecution of Sarah Palin: How the Elite Media Tried to Bring Down a Rising Star." * Currently edited by founder William Kristol and Fred Barnes, the Standard has been described as a "redoubt of neoconservatism" and as "the neo-con bible". (Wiki) I don't think it's a question of whether I believe the Washington Post... The did try and bring her down Just look back at posts on this forum and look at the viseral bs that came from those who swallowed the media bs Now, you can cherry pick all you like But the CNN one I just sent you shows she did not hurt McCain at worst You can lead a horse to knowledge - but if it goes against their beliefs they ain't drinking it in.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites