Channman 2 #1 September 19, 2013 Tom delay's laundering verdict over-turned with all judgments against DeLay being reversed. http://www.kvue.com/news/state/224406971.html Let the Wailing and Gnashing of teeth begin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #2 September 19, 2013 Wow. A rich politician managed to buy enough lawyers to keep him out of prison. That is amazing news. I must subscribe to your newsletter.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #3 September 19, 2013 quadeWow. A rich politician managed to buy enough lawyers to keep him out of prison. That is amazing news. I must subscribe to your newsletter. Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. But I don't see you accepting that answer because of his political stance.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #4 September 19, 2013 turtlespeedOr maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DiverMike 5 #5 September 19, 2013 Read the dissenting opinion. http://images.bimedia.net/documents/DeLay+Dissenting+Opinion.pdf IMHO Quades post rings true (and I usually vote republican). For the same reason I jump off a perfectly good diving board. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #6 September 19, 2013 It's always nice to see a jury being told that they did not know what they were doing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #7 September 19, 2013 quade ***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ. As I said. I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #8 September 19, 2013 quade***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ. You realize that OJ's son: A) Was big enough and strong enough to have committed the acts in question. B) REALLY did not like his soon-to-be-ex stepmother. C) Was at that tender age where impulse control is at a nadir. and D) Was the one person for whom OJ would take the heat without clarification? I do not claim that anyone in particular did it, and agree that it is pretty likely that OJ did. However, even if he had been convicted, there is a significant chance that he would fall on his sword before turning in his son. If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, you would have a shot at the Gold. BSBD, Winsor Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
regulator 0 #9 September 19, 2013 quade***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ.[/quote Im sure he's every bit as innocent as george zimmerman. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #10 September 19, 2013 Iago ***Tom delay's laundering verdict over-turned with all judgments against DeLay being reversed.http://www.kvue.com/news/state/224406971.html Let the Wailing and Gnashing of teeth begin. Isn't that the case where the prosecutor had to go to four grand juries before he found one that would give him an indictment? Yep, that be the one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #11 September 19, 2013 To note: Justice Melissa Goodwin of Austin wrote the majority opinion, joined by visiting Justice David Gaultney, both Republicans. The dissenting vote was cast by Chief Justice J. Woodfin "Woodie" Jones, a Democrat. Since I don't have a legal background, I conclude it's partisan politics at play...this time Delay won. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #12 September 19, 2013 Glad you've finally come around to understanding the situation. Delay is one of the most corrupt modern day politicians. The only reason he is free today is everything happened in Texas.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,527 #13 September 19, 2013 Oh, I'm sure there are plenty who are more corrupt; however, DeLay is corrupted in part by power, and he's an asshole. He wields power like a bat, preferring opposing views to be silenced by political force. If you never have to talk to someone, they don't exist, right? Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #14 September 19, 2013 quade***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ. As a matter of law, that is correct. Maybe the IRS will come after him. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Channman 2 #15 September 20, 2013 jclalorIt's always nice to see a jury being told that they did not know what they were doing. Well, at least the jury involved in the Zimmerman trail knew what they were doing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #16 September 20, 2013 quade ***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ. Truth be damned again "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites