0
Channman

The Hammer Nails IT

Recommended Posts

quade

Wow. A rich politician managed to buy enough lawyers to keep him out of prison.

That is amazing news. I must subscribe to your newsletter.



Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty. But I don't see you accepting that answer because of his political stance.
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quade

***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty.



I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ.

As I said.

:)
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quade

***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty.



I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ.

You realize that OJ's son:

A) Was big enough and strong enough to have committed the acts in question.

B) REALLY did not like his soon-to-be-ex stepmother.

C) Was at that tender age where impulse control is at a nadir.

and

D) Was the one person for whom OJ would take the heat without clarification?

I do not claim that anyone in particular did it, and agree that it is pretty likely that OJ did. However, even if he had been convicted, there is a significant chance that he would fall on his sword before turning in his son.

If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, you would have a shot at the Gold.


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Iago

***Tom delay's laundering verdict over-turned with all judgments against DeLay being reversed.:P

http://www.kvue.com/news/state/224406971.html

Let the Wailing and Gnashing of teeth begin.



Isn't that the case where the prosecutor had to go to four grand juries before he found one that would give him an indictment?

Yep, that be the one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To note: Justice Melissa Goodwin of Austin wrote the majority opinion, joined by visiting Justice David Gaultney, both Republicans. The dissenting vote was cast by Chief Justice J. Woodfin "Woodie" Jones, a Democrat.

Since I don't have a legal background, I conclude it's partisan politics at play...this time Delay won.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh, I'm sure there are plenty who are more corrupt; however, DeLay is corrupted in part by power, and he's an asshole. He wields power like a bat, preferring opposing views to be silenced by political force.

If you never have to talk to someone, they don't exist, right?

Wendy P.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quade

***Or maybe there is the possibility that he really wasn't guilty.



I'm sure he's every much as "not guilty" as OJ.

Truth be damned again

:D:D
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0