rushmc 23 #1 December 9, 2013 We are getting closer to the liberal utopia http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/cbotop-40-paid-1062-income-taxes-bottom-40-paid-91-got-average-18950"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tink1717 2 #2 December 10, 2013 That's not what a liberal utopia would look like. It would look more like Iceland or Norway.Skydivers don't knock on Death's door. They ring the bell and runaway... It really pisses him off. -The World Famous Tink. (I never heard of you either!!) AA #2069 ASA#33 POPS#8808 Swooo 1717 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #3 December 10, 2013 rushmc We are getting closer to the liberal utopiahttp://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/cbotop-40-paid-1062-income-taxes-bottom-40-paid-91-got-average-18950 Lol, you consider SS and MC a "transfer"? You do also realize where the economy was in 2010? From your source: Quote According to the CBO, households in the bottom quintile received an average of $22,700 in government transfers in 2010 (including $14,300 in payments from Medicare and Social Security Figures lie and liars figure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DiverMike 5 #4 December 10, 2013 QuoteFigures lie and liars figure. Wink If someone in getting Social Security 'benefits' because they paid into a broken system for 35 years, that is quite different than being a lazy deadbeat living of the government. Mathematically though, it isn't any different. For the same reason I jump off a perfectly good diving board. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #5 December 10, 2013 rushmc We are getting closer to the liberal utopiahttp://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/cbotop-40-paid-1062-income-taxes-bottom-40-paid-91-got-average-18950 Well, somebody has to pay for America's blood lust around the world. The wealthy supply the money, the poor supply the cannon fodder. How else would you suggest it is done? Good luck trying to get the rich to supply manpower. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #6 December 10, 2013 jclalor Quote According to the CBO, households in the bottom quintile received an average of $22,700 in government transfers in 2010 (including $14,300 in payments from Medicare and Social Security Figures lie and liars figure. There's definition a problem when you publish statistics about income taxes and then (selectively?) include the unrelated MC and SS expenditures. Income tax has a very specific meaning. Adding in those two mean we're now talked about federal taxes more broadly. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DiverMike 5 #7 December 11, 2013 Quotehere's definition a problem when you publish statistics about income taxes and then (selectively?) include the unrelated MC and SS expenditures. Income tax has a very specific meaning. Adding in those two mean we're now talked about federal taxes more broadly. I agree. Why single out those expenditures that aren't directly related to income tax? Why not include other expenditures like government employees, politicians, farm subsidies, etc. For the same reason I jump off a perfectly good diving board. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #8 December 11, 2013 Tink1717That's not what a liberal utopia would look like. It would look more like Iceland or Norway. Except it would be warm all the time. But yeah. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tink1717 2 #9 December 11, 2013 Skydivers don't knock on Death's door. They ring the bell and runaway... It really pisses him off. -The World Famous Tink. (I never heard of you either!!) AA #2069 ASA#33 POPS#8808 Swooo 1717 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #10 December 11, 2013 Iago It's OK when the media includes MC and SS taxes to pump up the tax rate that Buffet's secretary paid on her total income, even those are capped and can't be used to objectively compare to a high income earner. Oh, plus we'll include the employer portion which the employee doesn't pay to pump that tax percentage disparity even higher. If you want to have intelligent conversation, then 'two wrongs do not make a right.' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #11 December 11, 2013 QuoteLook what happened to McCain. He insisted on running a 'respectable campaign' against an opponent who did not. I don't recall that at all. I do recall McCain running an honorable campaign, but what did Obama do that wasn't honorable? - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #12 December 11, 2013 DanGQuoteLook what happened to McCain. He insisted on running a 'respectable campaign' against an opponent who did not. I don't recall that at all. I do recall McCain running an honorable campaign, but what did Obama do that wasn't honorable? Lied alot!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #13 December 11, 2013 rushmc *** Quote Look what happened to McCain. He insisted on running a 'respectable campaign' against an opponent who did not. I don't recall that at all. I do recall McCain running an honorable campaign, but what did Obama do that wasn't honorable? Lied alot! Only if that is how you want to look at it. The left can justify that what he campaigned on was 100% truthfull. 60% of the time he told the truth every time.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #14 December 11, 2013 QuoteLied alot! That's not what he meant, and you know it. And I assume by "lied" you mean that he made campaign promises that he failed to keep. If that's the standard, then McCain probably didn't run an honorable campaign either. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #15 December 11, 2013 Any non-wealthy person who resents the taxes paid by the wealthy - as recompense to the society that gave them the opportunity to become wealthy in the first place - is exactly the kind of sucker that P.T. Barnum was talking about. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #16 December 12, 2013 DanGQuoteLook what happened to McCain. He insisted on running a 'respectable campaign' against an opponent who did not. I don't recall that at all. I do recall McCain running an honorable campaign, but what did Obama do that wasn't honorable? Let the old man win. Iago - it's past time you MovedOn. Cut this nonsense about dishonorable campaign tactics (and really, anyone from a party that has Karl Rove needs to STFU about honor) and accept that Bush guaranteed that Jesus Christ himself couldn't win on the GOP ticket, and McCain doubled the problem by promising to maintain all Bush programs and then selected a fucking idiot to be his VP candidate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #17 December 12, 2013 DanGQuoteLied alot! That's not what he meant, and you know it. And I assume by "lied" you mean that he made campaign promises that he failed to keep. If that's the standard, then McCain probably didn't run an honorable campaign either. I never made any claim for McCain But McCain did not say he would have the most transparent admin in history Or that there would be no lobbiest around him How about posting all new proposed laws on line so many hours or days before congress would vote on it? Of course there is close Gauntamamo (but then any smart person had a good idea this would not happen) And I just picked some of what could control without congress"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #18 December 12, 2013 The discussion at hand was about running an honorable campaign. You decided to jump into it. Now you want to talk about failed campaign promises. That's fine, but don't try to pretend that you were being responsive to my question about the honorable campaign topic. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #19 December 12, 2013 DanGThe discussion at hand was about running an honorable campaign. You decided to jump into it. Now you want to talk about failed campaign promises. That's fine, but don't try to pretend that you were being responsive to my question about the honorable campaign topic. I dont see the claims I listed as campain promises Campain promises usually require that the president get his agenda through congress Not having any lobiests or having the most transparent admin ever are things he can directly control He knew this You call that being honorable? Ah Ok"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #20 December 12, 2013 When someone refers to a politician running an honorable campaign, they are talking about avoiding negative ads, avoiding lying or muckraking about their opponent, and keping the tone civil and polite. They are not talking about making promises that you fail to keep. That's a different discussion. Of course, you knew that, but you wanted to talk about something else. Again, that's fine, but it's not what we were talking about. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #21 December 12, 2013 DanGWhen someone refers to a politician running an honorable campaign, they are talking about avoiding negative ads, avoiding lying or muckraking about their opponent, and keping the tone civil and polite. They are not talking about making promises that you fail to keep. That's a different discussion. Of course, you knew that, but you wanted to talk about something else. Again, that's fine, but it's not what we were talking about. So now you get to define honorable ?? NOT"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #22 December 12, 2013 Whatever. There's no point in this discussion. Yes, Obama lied about some of his campaign promises. I'm not happy about that at all. On the other hand, he did run an honorable campaign with respect to how he treated his opponent. I'm done with this thread, have fun. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #23 December 12, 2013 DanGWhatever. There's no point in this discussion. Yes, Obama lied about some of his campaign promises. I'm not happy about that at all. On the other hand, he did run an honorable campaign with respect to how he treated his opponent. I'm done with this thread, have fun. Either you dont get it or you chose to ignore it Saying you will not have lobiest on your staff or, you will have the most transparent admin in history are not campain promises These are statments or how you will operate if elected HE has total control over these statements He lied! He never intended to be open and transparent If that is honorable in your mind so be it But it is not in most peoples minds"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #24 December 12, 2013 rushmc***When someone refers to a politician running an honorable campaign, they are talking about avoiding negative ads, avoiding lying or muckraking about their opponent, and keping the tone civil and polite. They are not talking about making promises that you fail to keep. That's a different discussion. Of course, you knew that, but you wanted to talk about something else. Again, that's fine, but it's not what we were talking about. So now you get to define honorable ?? NOT You picked the wrong word. He was defining campaign. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,517 #25 December 12, 2013 I believe that saying how you're going to govern once elected is exactly what a campaign promise is, along with stuff that you're going to deliver. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites