kallend 2,027 #176 February 5, 2015 jakee Quote You seem to forget nearly ALL inteligence angencies were saying the same But you dont care cause that kills your narative and attempt at re-writing history Uh, no it doesn't. That is the narrative. Either every intelligence agency, independently, came to the same wrong conclusion through sheer incompetence - or they were all receiving the same pressure to provide politically correct intelligence instead of just intelligence. Seriously, it's one thing not to agree, it's another thing to not even understand the argument. According to the Senate report, the CIA warned GWB not to use some of the stuff in his 2003 SOTU speech since it couldn't be verified, but he used it anyway. Lying SOB.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #177 February 5, 2015 Thats not lying. Using a number that is calculated according to how you said it was calculated. THAT is lying. Thought professors were smarter these days. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #178 February 5, 2015 SkyDekkerThats not lying. Using a number that is calculated according to how you said it was calculated. THAT is lying. Thought professors were smarter these days. Oh, right! Got it.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
