champu 1 #76 April 1, 2015 I know what binary, decimal, hexadecimal, octal, etc. are and I know what "binary coded decimal" is, but the term "Hexadecimal coded binary" struck me as... odd. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
base698 19 #77 April 1, 2015 Yeah, not quite right. I'll repeat this to stay on topic: All of the news is garbage: Fox, Al Jazeera, CNN, BBC http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli QuoteNews has no explanatory power. News items are bubbles popping on the surface of a deeper world. Will accumulating facts help you understand the world? Sadly, no. The relationship is inverted. The important stories are non-stories: slow, powerful movements that develop below journalists' radar but have a transforming effect. The more "news factoids" you digest, the less of the big picture you will understand. If more information leads to higher economic success, we'd expect journalists to be at the top of the pyramid. That's not the case. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #78 April 1, 2015 Amazon***After his (in)famous Sportpalast speech Goebbels wrote in his diary: "This hour of idiocy! If I had said to the people, jump out the fourth floor of Columbushaus, they would have done that too." I'd be really curious whether Fox News moderators believe their own stories themselves or rather despise their audience for actually trusting them. Some stories just sound too incredible to accept that they believe them themselves (no-go areas for non-Muslims in Europe come to mind, but then again that may not look as ridiculous from your side of the water as it does from mine). Never underestimate the ability of the weak of mind to embrace that much bullshit with glee on a daily basis as long as the skirts are short . it sucks to see such misogyny. I happen to think Erin Burnett is smart enough and gorgeous enough to be on Fox News. So is Brooke Baldwin. Are you saying that they are ugly? Or are you saying that they are nothing but tarts who got to the top through some other means because they are ditzy? Either way, I think it's disrespectful of them and of women as a whole. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #79 April 1, 2015 lawrocket******After his (in)famous Sportpalast speech Goebbels wrote in his diary: "This hour of idiocy! If I had said to the people, jump out the fourth floor of Columbushaus, they would have done that too." I'd be really curious whether Fox News moderators believe their own stories themselves or rather despise their audience for actually trusting them. Some stories just sound too incredible to accept that they believe them themselves (no-go areas for non-Muslims in Europe come to mind, but then again that may not look as ridiculous from your side of the water as it does from mine). Never underestimate the ability of the weak of mind to embrace that much bullshit with glee on a daily basis as long as the skirts are short . it sucks to see such misogyny. I happen to think Erin Burnett is smart enough and gorgeous enough to be on Fox News. So is Brooke Baldwin. Are you saying that they are ugly? Or are you saying that they are nothing but tarts who got to the top through some other means because they are ditzy? Either way, I think it's disrespectful of them and of women as a whole. Think what you will but reality does not seem to work too well for you.. You are supposed to be an attorney.. do some digging counselor.. What to you think the percentage of male viewers is that watch with their big heads and not their little heads. When Hotness of women is your metric.... I think the little head may be doing a significant amount of the thinkin. Hell I bet you actually believe what you wrote... do you think Rupert et al believe the same???? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #80 April 1, 2015 It's a visual medium. Ever hear of a face for radio? Yes, we DO want to see some ideal of beauty. I'm suggesting that CNN has stunners, too. Yet you aren't critical of it. Why not? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #81 April 1, 2015 lawrocketIt's a visual medium. Ever hear of a face for radio? Yes, we DO want to see some ideal of beauty. I'm suggesting that CNN has stunners, too. Yet you aren't critical of it. Why not? Which then begs the question: Will an ugly great journalist be overlooked for a stunning mediocre journalist? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #82 April 1, 2015 lawrocketIt's a visual medium. Ever hear of a face for radio? Yes, we DO want to see some ideal of beauty. I'm suggesting that CNN has stunners, too. Yet you aren't critical of it. Why not? Lets see,,,, THread Title "Fox News is the most trusted television outlet for news." Jerry's sigline... Check. ( I do not seesiglines But I think it something to do with hotness???) Credibilty check??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #83 April 1, 2015 SkyDekker***It's a visual medium. Ever hear of a face for radio? Yes, we DO want to see some ideal of beauty. I'm suggesting that CNN has stunners, too. Yet you aren't critical of it. Why not? Which then begs the question: Will an ugly great journalist be overlooked for a stunning mediocre journalist? So it begs the question.... Are journalistic "chops" a valid hiring point at FAUX.. or just Journalistic "thighs" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #84 April 1, 2015 SkyDekker***It's a visual medium. Ever hear of a face for radio? Yes, we DO want to see some ideal of beauty. I'm suggesting that CNN has stunners, too. Yet you aren't critical of it. Why not? Which then begs the question: Will an ugly great journalist be overlooked for a stunning mediocre journalist? On television? Yes. On radio or in print? Probably not. But we're talking anchors. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #85 April 1, 2015 QuoteFAUX... The use of this word never gets old for you does it.. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #86 April 1, 2015 Anvilbrother Quote FAUX.. . The use of this word never gets old for you does it.. Why for does that get all ya''lls little girl panties twisted right up... every time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driver1 0 #87 April 1, 2015 Amazon *** Quote FAUX.. . The use of this word never gets old for you does it.. Why for does that get all ya''lls little girl panties twisted right up... every time.Twist your panties up over this. CNN - Cable Numb Nuts, Cock-eNeyed News, Crazy News Network We could go on and on and on. There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #88 April 1, 2015 It does not offend me at it reflects directly on those that use it. I'm just shocked they don't realize that. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #89 April 1, 2015 Driver1 ****** Quote FAUX.. . The use of this word never gets old for you does it.. Why for does that get all ya''lls little girl panties twisted right up... every time.Twist your panties up over this. CNN - Cable Numb Nuts, Cock-eNeyed News, Crazy News Network We could go on and on and on. Go for it.... If that gives you that moment of validation to your life.. enjoyPst... ya'll forgot Commie News Network Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #90 April 1, 2015 AnvilbrotherIt does not offend me at it reflects directly on those that use it. I'm just shocked they don't realize that. Is that Okie or Cajun English Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 806 #91 April 1, 2015 That always bugged the poo outta me when Navy instructors said it backwards. Even in the training manuals. Like most things military, it stuck. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 221 #92 April 1, 2015 lawrocket******It's a visual medium. Ever hear of a face for radio? Yes, we DO want to see some ideal of beauty. I'm suggesting that CNN has stunners, too. Yet you aren't critical of it. Why not? Which then begs the question: Will an ugly great journalist be overlooked for a stunning mediocre journalist? On television? Yes. On radio or in print? Probably not. But we're talking anchors. Take Imus and Howard Stern as examplesI'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #93 April 1, 2015 Howard is the King of All Media. He successfully transitioned because people got to know him well enough and he was compelling enough that people want to see what he has to say. But he's not an anchor. He's not a reporter. He provides his take. He's like a comedian with a strong opinion and talks about what others won't. Howard's E Show and Howard TV work not because people want to see Howard but because we get to see a porn star show her boobs to and get hit on by Buzz Aldrin. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grue 1 #94 April 2, 2015 I long for the days when newspapers were called things like the "Dickcheeseville Democrat" or the "Analtraumatown Republican" or "Jizzmop City Constitutionalist". At least then you knew right at the onset which way the spin was going.cavete terrae. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites