Next reforms is gonna be the cops. Police goes nuts on little kids.

[skycop 0]

Great post, thanks for sharing!

"Just 'cause I'm simple, don't mean I'm stewpid!"

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

Unfortunately in the course of trying to save that infants life, I was a bit task saturated to worry about potential OSHA violations. I simply didn't have time to decontaminate, I wasn't just involved in the situations, I was leading them. All three would have been fatal, had it not been for the actions of my guys. There were also other things going on as well, and other emergency runs backing up

I appreciate the immediate action, the issue is on the follow up.

Let me puty it this way, if you had been shot and injured, would you have been able to stop and get help at that point? Both are potential deadly incidents, both really need the same level of action. Not doing so is a violation on your employers side.

[Andy9o8 2]

wmw999

Good editorial in the Dallas Morning News

Wendy P.

I think you need to re-read it, and maybe squint a bit. There's the ostensible message, and then there's the message, lent deft and plausible camouflage by the ostensible message. Both are there, and both are apparent.

[cvfd1399 0]

SkyDekker

Quote

Unfortunately in the course of trying to save that infants life, I was a bit task saturated to worry about potential OSHA violations. I simply didn't have time to decontaminate, I wasn't just involved in the situations, I was leading them. All three would have been fatal, had it not been for the actions of my guys. There were also other things going on as well, and other emergency runs backing up

I appreciate the immediate action, the issue is on the follow up.

Let me puty it this way, if you had been shot and injured, would you have been able to stop and get help at that point? Both are potential deadly incidents, both really need the same level of action. Not doing so is a violation on your employers side.

What is your argument here? The employer is at fault for not having enough manpower?

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

What is your argument here? The employer is at fault for not having enough manpower?

Mostly that the company he works for should have a plan to deal with an employee ingesting the bodily fluid of another person. This is a potentially deadly incident.

In Canada his employer would be breaking the law for not allowing him to deal with that properly.

[cvfd1399 0]

Quote

Mostly that the company he works for should have a plan to deal with an employee ingesting the bodily fluid of another person. This is a potentially deadly incident.

Who said that they dont?, or they wouldn't if he told them about it?

[turtlespeed 226]

SkyDekker

Quote

What is your argument here? The employer is at fault for not having enough manpower?

Mostly that the company he works for should have a plan to deal with an employee ingesting the bodily fluid of another person. This is a potentially deadly incident.

In Canada his employer would be breaking the law for not allowing him to deal with that properly.

Hmmm. So, every Canadian company has a contingency plan for being the receptacle of a blowjob?

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[SkyDekker 1,465]

No No, we can't all be turtles.

[cvfd1399 0]

Still waiting on an answer.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Waiting who specifically said it? Nobody did, but his comment would have made no sense if he was free to, but decided not to.

Now you will say, aha, nobody said anything specifically, so we can start moving the goalposts all around.

Hence, why I didn't answer

[cvfd1399 0]

It made perfect sense. I absolutely believe he was free to do so if he chose. But he decidede to serve his community instead.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

cvfd1399

It made perfect sense. I absolutely believe he was free to do so if he chose. But he decidede to serve his community instead.

Then don't complain about a voluntary action.

(Never mind that Health and Safety regulations cannot be circumvented voluntarily. The employer has an obligation here, even if the employee waives it.)

[cvfd1399 0]

Your the one complaining about a voluntary action not me!!!!' I'm the one who applauded the action to serve his community in need, your the one complaining about obligations, osha, and responsibilities. wtf you lost or something?

Actually whatever you think is fine im not interested in your opinion anymore on this, your obviously locked into that retarded opinion.

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

Your the one complaining about a voluntary action not me!!!!

Actually, no. He brought it up to underscore how tough things are for him.

Quote

I'm the one who applauded the action to serve his community in need

Meh, he is getting paid for it and chose the job himself. I am sick and tired of this glorification of police and soldiers. You knew what the job was when you signed up.

Quote

your the one complaining about obligations, osha, and responsibilities.

Not complaining it all. Just highlighting that his employer is breaking regulations and if he had a problem with it, he has avenues open to him.

Quote

your obviously locked into that retarded opinion.

*you're

[normiss 851]

"your obviously locked into that retarded opinion. "

Golden.

[Anvilbrother 0]

SkyDekker

Quote

Unfortunately in the course of trying to save that infants life, I was a bit task saturated to worry about potential OSHA violations. I simply didn't have time to decontaminate, I wasn't just involved in the situations, I was leading them. All three would have been fatal, had it not been for the actions of my guys. There were also other things going on as well, and other emergency runs backing up

I appreciate the immediate action, the issue is on the follow up.

Let me puty put it this way, if you had been shot and injured, would you have been able to stop and get help at that point? Both are potential deadly incidents, both really need the same level of action. Not doing so is a violation on your employers employers' side.

Found some more for you.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[normiss 851]

You clearly meant "employer's".

[Amazon 7]

cvfd1399

It made perfect sense. I absolutely believe he was free to do so if he chose. But he decidede decided to serve his community instead.

Cool..... I want to play too

[Anvilbrother 0]

normiss

You clearly meant "employer's".

No, I meant what I wrote.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

Found some more for you.

lol, you missed the point. There is a reason I only picked a problem in that specific sentence.

And yeah, it should be employer's not employers' or employers.

[Anvilbrother 0]

I know why, and I agree, but why be a grammar nazi all the time instead of focusing on the topics, it's just dickish when a person does that. And no in modern writing it is considered ok for it to be employees' look it up. The accepted rules have changed.

Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along,

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Anvilbrother

I know why, and I agree, but why be a grammar nazi all the time instead of focusing on the topics, it's just dickish when a person does that. And no in modern writing it is considered ok for it to be employees' look it up. The accepted rules have changed.

I could care less about his grammar, it was a sublte response to something else.

On the second issue. Employer is singular in that sentence, hence it would have to be employer's.

As an example: Employer's organization and Employers' organization are two very different things.

[RMK 3]

Getting back to the over-zealous police and black children at pools topic; they're at it again:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/17/fairfield-ohio-pool-police_n_7603484.html

Isn't America getting tired of these half-witted "Barney Fifes"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gx4jn77VKlQ

"Pain is the best instructor, but no one wants to attend his classes"

[turtlespeed 226]

RMK

Getting back to the over-zealous police and black children at pools topic; they're at it again:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/17/fairfield-ohio-pool-police_n_7603484.html

Isn't America getting tired of these half-witted "Barney Fifes"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gx4jn77VKlQ

It appears that they were asked to leave several times, and then, after refusing, started resisting the arrest.

It seems somewhat staged, and grand stranded.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[Amazon 7]

turtlespeed

***Getting back to the over-zealous police and black children at pools topic; they're at it again:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/17/fairfield-ohio-pool-police_n_7603484.html

Isn't America getting tired of these half-witted "Barney Fifes"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gx4jn77VKlQ

It appears that they were asked to leave several times, and then, after refusing, started resisting the arrest.

It seems somewhat staged, and grand stranded.

Well if you think they are uppity negros..... I guess its ok to rip them off while being racist pricks.