ryoder 1,590 #426 September 16, 2015 Another court ruling against the old bigot: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kim-davis-legal-setback_55f868d9e4b09ecde1d9f4c4"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rifleman 70 #427 September 16, 2015 An interesting take on this from George Takei http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/14/how-kim-davis-violated-the-first-amendment.html?via=desktop&source=facebookAtheism is a Non-Prophet Organisation Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #428 September 20, 2015 Sounds like the old dipshit has violated the court order: http://news.yahoo.com/infamous-kentucky-clerk-kim-davis-220635278.html"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 841 #429 September 20, 2015 Likely a felony violation this time it would seem. I hope the judge recognizes that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driver1 0 #430 September 25, 2015 And the bigot has blamed the Kentucky governor for her legal issues... http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kentucky-clerk-kim-davis-blames-governor-for-legal-woes/ar-AAeKL5b?li=AAa0dzB No, you cunt. He was just following the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT's order, making sure all clerks follow the directive, or resign. YOU are doing this to yourself, Kimmy... There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,241 #431 September 25, 2015 On a lighter note. Today my wife and I are attending our first gay wedding. Donald and James are good friends, James is a partner in the DZ with me. Also my first ever "black tie preferred" social event. I had to rent a tux.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #432 September 25, 2015 Driver1 And the bigot has blamed the Kentucky governor for her legal issues... http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kentucky-clerk-kim-davis-blames-governor-for-legal-woes/ar-AAeKL5b?li=AAa0dzB No, you cunt. He was just following the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT's order, making sure all clerks follow the directive, or resign. YOU are doing this to yourself, Kimmy... She is the kind of official that the American Taliban has gotten behind look at how many support her... all the way up to Huckabee... Morals police next??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,556 #433 September 25, 2015 Quote No, you cunt. He was just following the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT's order, making sure all clerks follow the directive, or resign. Right? She's a clerk. It's her job to file paperwork, not create policy. Do your job or fuck off. Yet again I find myself asking, why the fuck is this an elected position in the first place? A person's political views or appeal to the electorate has absolutely no bearing on their ability to stamp documents and file papersDo you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,421 #434 September 25, 2015 Hi Jeanne, Quoteall the way up to Huckabee Don't you mean 'all the way down to Huckabee?' Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driver1 0 #435 September 25, 2015 jakee Quote No, you cunt. He was just following the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT's order, making sure all clerks follow the directive, or resign. Right? She's a clerk. It's her job to file paperwork, not create policy. Do your job or fuck off. Yet again I find myself asking, why the fuck is this an elected position in the first place? A person's political views or appeal to the electorate has absolutely no bearing on their ability to stamp documents and file papers Agreed. It shouldn't be a political position that's voted in via elections. I just find it exasperating that despite the Supreme Court being the highest court in the land where its decisions are final and binding, and they have refused to hear Kim's argument, IIRC, which should bring a final end to this bullshit, and the cunt won't roll over and play along. There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #436 September 25, 2015 Driver1 Agreed. It shouldn't be a political position that's voted in via elections. I just find it exasperating that despite the Supreme Court being the highest court in the land where its decisions are final and binding, and they have refused to hear Kim's argument, IIRC, which should bring a final end to this bullshit, and the cunt won't roll over and play along. The Supreme Court's refusal to hear it, means the lower court's ruling stands. But since she is an elected official, she holds the office until: a) She resigns. b) She is impeached by the state legislature (which does not meet again until next year.) c) Her term expires. d) She dies."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,098 #437 September 25, 2015 ryoder *** Agreed. It shouldn't be a political position that's voted in via elections. I just find it exasperating that despite the Supreme Court being the highest court in the land where its decisions are final and binding, and they have refused to hear Kim's argument, IIRC, which should bring a final end to this bullshit, and the cunt won't roll over and play along. The Supreme Court's refusal to hear it, means the lower court's ruling stands. But since she is an elected official, she holds the office until: a) She resigns. b) She is impeached by the state legislature (which does not meet again until next year.) c) Her term expires. d) She dies. It should be (b). If for any reason she finds herself unable to perform the duties of her office in accordance with the law of the land, she should do the decent thing and resign. The fact that she hasn't suggests to me that this is simply grandstanding.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #438 September 25, 2015 JerryBaumchenHi Jeanne, Quoteall the way up to Huckabee Don't you mean 'all the way down to Huckabee?' Jerry Baumchen I go with the assumption that the biggest turds always rise to the top of the cess pool. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 841 #439 November 4, 2015 She's baaaack! IMO, her time is up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driver1 0 #440 November 4, 2015 normiss She's baaaack! IMO, her time is up. God. Damn. The SCOTUS is supposed to be the end of all court cases and appeals and shit. She apparently doesn't give a fuck.There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #441 November 4, 2015 Driver1 ***She's baaaack! IMO, her time is up. God. Damn. The SCOTUS is supposed to be the end of all court cases and appeals and shit. She apparently doesn't give a fuck.She really needs to spend some quality time in jail with her next husband. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driver1 0 #442 November 6, 2015 Next Kentucky Governor, who will assume office in January, has said he will remove clerks' names from marriage licenses by executive order... http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kentuckys-governor-elect-to-remove-clerk-names-from-state-marriage-licenses/ar-CC2go5?li=BBgzzfcThere will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #443 November 6, 2015 Driver1 Next Kentucky Governor, who will assume office in January, has said he will remove clerks' names from marriage licenses by executive order... http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kentuckys-governor-elect-to-remove-clerk-names-from-state-marriage-licenses/ar-CC2go5?li=BBgzzfc Sounds like an effective way to save money actually Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Driver1 0 #444 November 6, 2015 Amazon ***Next Kentucky Governor, who will assume office in January, has said he will remove clerks' names from marriage licenses by executive order... http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kentuckys-governor-elect-to-remove-clerk-names-from-state-marriage-licenses/ar-CC2go5?li=BBgzzfc Sounds like an effective way to save money actuallyYep. As long as the assbag clerks will let whoever wants to marry, get their licenses.There will be no addressing the customers as "Bitches", "Morons" or "Retards"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #445 December 23, 2015 So now the KY governor thinks he can overrule state law: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/23/460790418/per-governors-order-kentucky-marriage-licenses-no-longer-need-clerks-name"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #446 December 23, 2015 ryoderSo now the KY governor thinks he can overrule state law: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/23/460790418/per-governors-order-kentucky-marriage-licenses-no-longer-need-clerks-name Ah, so do you not think it is a good compromise? Or is the liberal way of thinking appalled that it tried and was not able to force compliance of its wishes, in that, her name, specifically, is no longer associated with a document that represents something that goes against her religious beliefs?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #447 December 23, 2015 turtlespeed***So now the KY governor thinks he can overrule state law: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/23/460790418/per-governors-order-kentucky-marriage-licenses-no-longer-need-clerks-name Ah, so do you not think it is a good compromise? Or is the liberal way of thinking appalled that it tried and was not able to force compliance of its wishes, in that, her name, specifically, is no longer associated with a document that represents something that goes against her religious beliefs? Violating the law enacted by the state legislature is a "compromise"? If the legislature amended the law, that would be a compromise. If Obama made a decree that violated law enacted by Congress, would you call that a compromise?"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #448 December 23, 2015 turtlespeed***So now the KY governor thinks he can overrule state law: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/23/460790418/per-governors-order-kentucky-marriage-licenses-no-longer-need-clerks-name Ah, so do you not think it is a good compromise? Or is the liberal way of thinking appalled that it tried and was not able to force compliance of its wishes, in that, her name, specifically, is no longer associated with a document that represents something that goes against her religious beliefs? What is wrong with just following the law? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 841 #449 December 23, 2015 Kentucky apparently. If a clerk no longer certifies documents, what is their purpose? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #450 December 23, 2015 ryoder******So now the KY governor thinks he can overrule state law: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/12/23/460790418/per-governors-order-kentucky-marriage-licenses-no-longer-need-clerks-name Ah, so do you not think it is a good compromise? Or is the liberal way of thinking appalled that it tried and was not able to force compliance of its wishes, in that, her name, specifically, is no longer associated with a document that represents something that goes against her religious beliefs? Violating the law enacted by the state legislature is a "compromise"? If the legislature amended the law, that would be a compromise. If Obama made a decree that violated law enacted by Congress, would you call that a compromise? Why don't we ever see this kind of pushback from you guys when Obama does the equivalent? Or did you forget that he simply won't enforce the immigration laws as they stand?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
