Bolas 5 #276 July 31, 2015 JohnnyMarko ********* Quote There is no fix for the easy access to guns that exists in America. There is a fix. There just isn't an easy or palatable fix. There's a fix to get illegal guns away from criminals? Spaying and Neutering???? And declawing....I'm trying to come up with a joke about "hand"guns and not having hands, but I'm coming up empty handed. The Second Amendment only guarantees "the right to bear arms", says nothing about the right to hands... Thank you, thank you. I'm here all week. Please try the veal. Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champu 1 #277 July 31, 2015 http://www.amazon.com/Right-Bear-Arms-Shirt-MERICA/dp/B00IYK2P2O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1438358900&sr=8-1&keywords=Bear+Arms Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #278 July 31, 2015 So your saying there are different types of background check systems? That a CCW system would have caught that guy and the federal one to purchase a gun wouldn't have? Isn't that my point about a single all encompassing go to system where all info is? QuoteWhy would you support illegal gun ownership? Why do you ask these childish questions phrased to insinuate the beliefs of a person? Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 798 #279 July 31, 2015 There IS a system in place, a lack of response should never default in the issuing of a weapon. Defending the issuing of weapons without a completed background check, is in fact, defending the illegal purchase of weapons. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #280 July 31, 2015 normiss There IS a system in place, a lack of response should never default in the issuing of a weapon. Defending the issuing of weapons without a completed background check, is in fact, defending the illegal purchase of weapons. .....ok whatever you wish to think... Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyMarko 1 #281 July 31, 2015 Can we ban all smiley faces in SC? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #282 July 31, 2015 JohnnyMarko Can we ban all smiley faces in SC? yes - for the children ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 798 #283 July 31, 2015 They're not children! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bolas 5 #284 July 31, 2015 JohnnyMarko Can we ban all smiley faces in SC? They prefer to be called emoticons or emoji now. Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #285 August 1, 2015 normiss There IS a system in place, a lack of response should never default in the issuing of a weapon. Defending the issuing of weapons without a completed background check, is in fact, defending the illegal purchase of weapons. There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #286 August 1, 2015 normiss There IS a system in place, a lack of response should never default in the issuing of a weapon. Defending the issuing of weapons without a completed background check, is in fact, defending the illegal purchase of weapons. There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,990 #287 August 2, 2015 >There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #288 August 2, 2015 billvon >There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? I was so not going to voice how that statement was so far right of center that it just made me shake my head with a huge WTFI bet all those crazies in ultra conservative militias would love that... and get rid of all gun control measures from just after WW I so any one could get whatever they wanted just like the good old days Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #289 August 2, 2015 billvon>There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? I think some in this forum should have background checks before they can post And to your question. They will get guns regardless. They dont follow laws"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #290 August 2, 2015 normissThose "multi-billion dollar systems" are already in place. It's required to get a clean result to obtain a CCW, why not extend that to all purchases? Why would you support illegal gun ownership? Maine just went permitless conceal carry. More states headed that way"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GeorgiaDon 362 #291 August 2, 2015 rushmc ***>There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? I think some in this forum should have background checks before they can post And to your question. They will get guns regardless. They dont follow lawsSome people still drive drunk. Therefore, we should do away with DUI laws? Some people commit murder. Therefore, we should not bother to outlaw murder? Perhaps we should only have laws against things nobody ever does. Don_____________________________________ Tolerance is the cost we must pay for our adventure in liberty. (Dworkin, 1996) “Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire.” (Yeats) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #292 August 2, 2015 GeorgiaDon ******>There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? I think some in this forum should have background checks before they can post And to your question. They will get regardless. They dont follow lawsSome people still drive drunk. Therefore, we should do away with DUI laws? Some people commit murder. Therefore, we should not bother to outlaw murder? Perhaps we should only have laws against things nobody ever does. Don Lol it has been admitted that none of the shootings, Sandy Hook, Aurora, Lafayette theater, none of them, would have been stopped or prevented by any of the laws that you guys are pushing here. The only people are affected, are the law abiding. So your straw man is debunked. And you don't know what you're talking about again"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 220 #293 August 2, 2015 GeorgiaDon ******>There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? I think some in this forum should have background checks before they can post And to your question. They will get guns regardless. They dont follow lawsSome people still drive drunk. Therefore, we should do away with DUI laws? Some people commit murder. Therefore, we should not bother to outlaw murder? Perhaps we should only have laws against things nobody ever does. Don You mean like illegal immigration? Cuz . . . They enforce that one as much as they wish guns were controlled, don't they? I know what the next argument is, and you don't need to try it. People are injured and killed by illegal immigrants every day too. One is too many, think of the children.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,026 #294 August 3, 2015 rushmc *********>There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? I think some in this forum should have background checks before they can post And to your question. They will get regardless. They dont follow lawsSome people still drive drunk. Therefore, we should do away with DUI laws? Some people commit murder. Therefore, we should not bother to outlaw murder? Perhaps we should only have laws against things nobody ever does. Don Lol it has been admitted that none of the shootings, Sandy Hook, Aurora, Lafayette theater, none of them, would have been stopped or prevented by any of the laws that you guys are pushing here. The only people are affected, are the law abiding. So your straw man is debunked. And you don't know what you're talking about again That is only because the existing laws are totally toothless, on account of people like YOU. And you STILL are using the term "straw man" incorrectly.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #295 August 3, 2015 kallend ************>There is no reason there should be a background check to begin with Do you think it's a good idea to sell guns to convicted murderers? I think some in this forum should have background checks before they can post And to your question. They will get regardless. They dont follow lawsSome people still drive drunk. Therefore, we should do away with DUI laws? Some people commit murder. Therefore, we should not bother to outlaw murder? Perhaps we should only have laws against things nobody ever does. Don Lol it has been admitted that none of the shootings, Sandy Hook, Aurora, Lafayette theater, none of them, would have been stopped or prevented by any of the laws that you guys are pushing here. The only people are affected, are the law abiding. So your straw man is debunked. And you don't know what you're talking about again That is only because the existing laws are totally toothless, on account of people like YOU. And you STILL are using the term "straw man" incorrectly.[/quote Says Mr gun banner himself"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,444 #296 August 3, 2015 Quotegun bannerSaying something repeatedly doesn't make it true. I've never heard Kallend talking about banning guns. He's opinionated and pointed in his disagreements, but that doesnt change what he actually says Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 220 #297 August 3, 2015 wmw999 Quote gun banner Saying something repeatedly doesn't make it true. I've never heard Kallend talking about banning guns. He's opinionated and pointed in his disagreements, but that doesnt change what he actually says Wendy P. Scary isn't it when I find myself agreeing with you and john more and more . . . I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #298 August 3, 2015 wmw999Quotegun bannerSaying something repeatedly doesn't make it true. I've never heard Kallend talking about banning guns. He's opinionated and pointed in his disagreements, but that doesnt change what he actually says Wendy P. He never says anything directly. You know that. But one time he stated his so called solutions Ya. He is a gun banner I did not say it. He did"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #299 August 3, 2015 wmw999Quotegun bannerSaying something repeatedly doesn't make it true. I've never heard Kallend talking about banning guns. He's opinionated and pointed in his disagreements, but that doesnt change what he actually says Wendy P. BTW Wendy If you still do not believe me, ask kallend. Ask him what specific actions he thinks should be put into place My bet? He will not answer you (uless he does it in a private message) He did once here years ago. And he got jumped when it became very clear that the actions he proposed would be a ban by defautl So did he ever directly call for a ban? No But in the end that is what he proposes (backdoor)"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #300 August 3, 2015 rushmc***Quotegun bannerSaying something repeatedly doesn't make it true. I've never heard Kallend talking about banning guns. He's opinionated and pointed in his disagreements, but that doesnt change what he actually says Wendy P. He never says anything directly. You know that. But one time he stated his so called solutions Ya. He is a gun banner I did not say it. He did And you apparently support guns for criminals and nutters with that no background checks idiocy. I think all responsible gun owners think that some people in this society have lost their right to own weapons by their actions and anti-social behavior. Personally I don't want criminals to have weapons.... if they use a weapon in the commission of a crime is a good reason to be locked away for life in the deepest darkest hole that the federal prison system has. We have a severly screwed up "justice system" that put low level dope smokers in jail for extended sentences... while violent criminals walk daily. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites