Obama's legacy

[rushmc 23]

http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/jun/13/dave-brat/dave-brat-us-labor-participation-rate-lowest-70s/

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,027]

rushmc

Since 1978. My bad.

http://www.businessinsider.com/lfpr-falls-to-lowest-level-since-1978-2014-5

From that article (which it seems you didn't read) "The LFPR has been falling for a number of reasons including an aging workforce consisting of retiring baby boomers and growing numbers of young folks heading to school."

Yes, boomer retirement and millennials going to college, definitely Obama's fault. Trump will fix that - boomers won't be able to afford retirement with the GOP's social security plans, and kids won't be able to afford college under the new Sec. of Education.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[JerryBaumchen 1,366]

Hi John,

Quote

From that article (which it seems you didn't read)

Nothing new there; normal SOP for him.

Jerry Baumchen

PS) Baumchen: 'The average American voter is uninformed and prefers to remain so.'

[rushmc 23]

JerryBaumchen

Hi John,

Quote

From that article (which it seems you didn't read)

Nothing new there; normal SOP for him.

Jerry Baumchen

PS) Baumchen: 'The average American voter is uninformed and prefers to remain so.'

They are more informed today. That is known because Hillary is not our president elect.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[JerryBaumchen 1,366]

Hi rush,

Quote

They are more informed today.

And 'they' voted for HRC by a margin of over 2 million.

I know: The truth hurts

Jerry Baumchen

[airdvr 210]

Quote

boomers won't be able to afford retirement with the GOP's social security plans, and kids won't be able to afford college under the new Sec. of Education.

This is fun :) I'm assuming you think current social security Ponzi scheme is working well.

And since when has a college education been considered affordable?

Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

[wmw999 2,452]

A college education was generally affordable for the baby boomers; certainly through the 70's. You had to sacrifice some, you might not go to a first-choice school, you might have to work for a couple of years or move somewhere with cheaper in-state tuition (and wait out the residency period), but it was affordable.

I put myself through private school then. I ate a lot of mac-and-cheese and drove hoopties and always had a roommate, but I ended up with minimal debt from a good school.

And now I'm unemployed. Of course, that's by choice; I'm a retired baby boomer, living off savings and a small pension. Eventually I'll apply for Social Security, but it's not my only expectation. I guess that means I'm contributing to Rush's unemployment numbers

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[rushmc 23]

JerryBaumchen

Hi rush,

Quote

They are more informed today.

And 'they' voted for HRC by a margin of over 2 million.

I know: The truth hurts

Jerry Baumchen

She lost.

The truth is painful isnt it...

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[normiss 801]

They're sure to get vouchers for god schools though.

[jakee 1,499]

rushmc

***Hi rush,

Quote

They are more informed today.

And 'they' voted for HRC by a margin of over 2 million.

I know: The truth hurts

Jerry Baumchen

She lost.

The truth is painful isnt it...

You replied to a comment about the 'average voter' not about the election result.

More of the country voted for Hilary, get over it.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

******Hi rush,

Quote

They are more informed today.

And 'they' voted for HRC by a margin of over 2 million.

I know: The truth hurts

Jerry Baumchen

She lost.

The truth is painful isnt it...

You replied to a comment about the 'average voter' not about the election result.

More of the country voted for Hilary, get over it.

Hillary lost.
That is fact.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,499]

rushmc

Hillary lost.
That is fact.

Not in dispute.

But more of the country voted for her. This is fact.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

jakee

***
Hillary lost.
That is fact.

Not in dispute.

But more of the country voted for her. This is fact.

No
More individuals voted for her.

More states (IE: more of the country) voted for Trump
This fact is proven by the EC vote count.

http://brilliantmaps.com/2016-county-election-map/

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,499]

rushmc

******
Hillary lost.
That is fact.

Not in dispute.

But more of the country voted for her. This is fact.

No
More individuals voted for her.
Yes.
More of the country.

Quote

More states (IE: more of the country) voted for Trump.

No. Not 'IE'.

States are not equal portions of the country.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[kallend 2,027]

rushmc

******
Hillary lost.
That is fact.

Not in dispute.

But more of the country voted for her. This is fact.

No
More individuals voted for her.

More states (IE: more of the country) voted for Trump
This fact is proven by the EC vote count.

http://brilliantmaps.com/2016-county-election-map/

I don't recall seeing any states waiting in line to cast a vote. Or counties. Or forests. Or mountains. Or deserts. Or cornfields, Or rivers.

I only recall seeing PEOPLE lining up to vote.

"Government of the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE, for the PEOPLE" seems to have got lost somewhere.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[rushmc 23]

jakee

States are not equal portions of the country.

Now you are starting to get it!!!!!

Part of the reason for the EC!

Per the link I attached, Trump got winning numbers in 84% of the counties. Winning the presidency , in this case, with only 16% of the counties voting for you, is not possible and should not be possible if all the states are to be treated fairly. That is what the EC does.

In any event, Trump won under the rules that both he and Hillary ran under. Now, per typical crybaby liberal, many want to complain about the rules and say but but but.


I say get over it.

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[jakee 1,499]

rushmc

***

States are not equal portions of the country.

Now you are starting to get it!!!!!
Wish I could say the same for you.

Quote

Part of the reason for the EC!

None of the reason for the EC.

Quote

Per the link I attached, Trump got winning numbers in 84% of the counties.

Who cares? Counties are not equal parts of the country either. They're completely random and arbitrary divisions.

The smallest county in the US has 82 people living in it, the largest has 10,000,000. Therefore only a moron would think that it is at all important who won more counties.

In any event, Trump won under the rules that both he and Hillary ran under.
Sure, but that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about who more of the country voted for, and that was Hilary.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[billvon 2,998]

>More individuals voted for her.

Correct. The people of the US chose her.

>More states (IE: more of the country) voted for Trump

Correct. The political system we have chose Trump.

[rushmc 23]

billvon

>More individuals voted for her.

Correct. The people of the US chose her.

>More states (IE: more of the country) voted for Trump

Correct. The political system we have chose Trump.

And if CA is removed from the count. Trump won the popular vote of the rest of the country since Hillary won CA by 2.3 M votes

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[billvon 2,998]

>And if CA is removed from the count. Trump won the popular vote of the rest of the country since
>Hillary won CA by 2.3 M votes

Very true! And if all the least-educated voters were removed from the count, Clinton would have won by a landslide.

[rushmc 23]

billvon

>And if CA is removed from the count. Trump won the popular vote of the rest of the country since
>Hillary won CA by 2.3 M votes

Very true! And if all the least-educated voters were removed from the count, Clinton would have won by a landslide.

Now that is just trolling

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Lawndarter 3]

rushmc

***>And if CA is removed from the count. Trump won the popular vote of the rest of the country since
>Hillary won CA by 2.3 M votes

Very true! And if all the least-educated voters were removed from the count, Clinton would have won by a landslide.

Now that is just trolling

To paraphrase an old quote:

"Although it is not true that all Trump voters are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are Trump voters."

[jakee 1,499]

rushmc

***>More individuals voted for her.

Correct. The people of the US chose her.

>More states (IE: more of the country) voted for Trump

Correct. The political system we have chose Trump.

And if CA is removed from the count. Trump won the popular vote of the rest of the country since Hillary won CA by 2.3 M votes

So? Why would you do that? I'm pretty sure Californians are also Americans.

And why is only California on the table? If Texas is removed from the count Hilary won the rest of the country by three and a half million votes! How can you say Trump won most of the country when Hilary won everywhere but Texas with a three and a half million vote majority?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[rushmc 23]

Lawndarter

******>And if CA is removed from the count. Trump won the popular vote of the rest of the country since
>Hillary won CA by 2.3 M votes

Very true! And if all the least-educated voters were removed from the count, Clinton would have won by a landslide.

Now that is just trolling

To paraphrase an old quote:

"Although it is not true that all Trump voters are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are Trump voters."

More trolling

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[gowlerk 2,205]

brenthutch

leg·a·cy
ˈleɡəsē/
noun
noun: legacy; plural noun: legacies
2.
a thing handed down by a predecessor.
"the legacy of centuries of neglect"
synonyms: consequence, effect, upshot, spin-off, repercussion, aftermath, by-product, result
"a legacy of the wars"

If Obamacare collapses before he leaves office, will it still be part of his legacy?

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/05/financially-unstable-connecticut-obamacare-co-op-now-under-state-supervision.html

Obamacare has not collapsed. And the Rs are coming to see some of the realities of power. Meanwhile Trump is not even sworn in yet and he is already making BHO's legacy look pretty good.

So how is it looking now Brent?

Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free.