ryoder 1,590 #1 July 21, 2016 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/federal-court-rules-texas-id-law-violates-voting-rights-act.html Another TX law bites the dust."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,253 #2 July 21, 2016 The best part? It was the Fifth Circuit Court that made the ruling. The most conservative appeals court in your nation.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #3 July 21, 2016 ryoderhttp://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/federal-court-rules-texas-id-law-violates-voting-rights-act.html Another TX law bites the dust. Ahhhh Actually is doesn't I think maybe you should do a bit more research and get some info from places other than the NY Times"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,545 #4 July 21, 2016 OK, according to a quick survey of news sources (if nothing else, I read the Houston Chronicle this morning), the state of Texas was ordered to make changes to the law before the November election. Seems to indicate they don't think it's hunky-dory as it is. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #5 July 21, 2016 rushmc***http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/federal-court-rules-texas-id-law-violates-voting-rights-act.html Another TX law bites the dust. Ahhhh Actually is doesn't I think maybe you should do a bit more research and get some info from places other than the NY Times Pick one: https://www.google.com/search?q=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Violates+Voting+Rights+Act&oq=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Violates+Voting+Rights+Act&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61j69i60l2&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Voting+Rights+Act"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #6 July 21, 2016 ryoder******http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/federal-court-rules-texas-id-law-violates-voting-rights-act.html Another TX law bites the dust. Ahhhh Actually is doesn't I think maybe you should do a bit more research and get some info from places other than the NY Times Pick one: https://www.google.com/search?q=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Violates+Voting+Rights+Act&oq=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Violates+Voting+Rights+Act&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61j69i60l2&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Voting+Rights+Act Maybe they should just be required to show their insurance card then.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #7 July 21, 2016 turtlespeed Maybe they should just be required to show their insurance card then. You expect the government to accept an ID issued not by a government agency, but a private company?"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #8 July 21, 2016 ryoder******http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/federal-court-rules-texas-id-law-violates-voting-rights-act.html Another TX law bites the dust. Ahhhh Actually is doesn't I think maybe you should do a bit more research and get some info from places other than the NY Times Pick one: https://www.google.com/search?q=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Violates+Voting+Rights+Act&oq=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Violates+Voting+Rights+Act&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61j69i60l2&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=Federal+Court+Rules+Texas%E2%80%99+ID+Law+Voting+Rights+Act http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/07/20/texas-voter-id-law-ruled-discriminatory/"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #9 July 21, 2016 wmw999OK, according to a quick survey of news sources (if nothing else, I read the Houston Chronicle this morning), the state of Texas was ordered to make changes to the law before the November election. Seems to indicate they don't think it's hunky-dory as it is. Wendy P. Yes The court saw issues with it. but the law did not "bite the dust" as the op posted. Seem my link in my reply to him"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #10 July 21, 2016 ryoderA federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that ......... the state must find ways to accommodate voters who face hardships in obtaining the necessary documents.. so they aren't opposed to the concept, just the implementation ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #11 July 24, 2016 If you want to know if it's actually constitutional, tie the right to vote to a right to own a firearm. I mean, a requirement doesn't infringe on one right, then it doesn't infringe on the other, right? A constitutionally protected right is a constitutionally protected right."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #12 July 24, 2016 jgoose71If you want to know if it's actually constitutional, tie the right to vote to a right to own a firearm. I mean, a requirement doesn't infringe on one right, then it doesn't infringe on the other, right? A constitutionally protected right is a constitutionally protected right. There should be a waiting period between the decision to vote and the allowance to vote. There should be a federal background check for anyone that wants to vote. On the flip side - Let's have Vote Shows!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 333 #13 July 24, 2016 turtlespeed There should be a waiting period between the decision to vote and the allowance to vote. There should be a federal background check for anyone that wants to vote. On the flip side - Let's have Vote Shows! Is that where I can buy votes with no restrictions? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #14 July 24, 2016 headoverheels*** There should be a waiting period between the decision to vote and the allowance to vote. There should be a federal background check for anyone that wants to vote. On the flip side - Let's have Vote Shows! Is that where I can buy votes with no restrictions? Only privately. Not from licensed vote dealers.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgoose71 0 #15 July 24, 2016 kallend****** There should be a waiting period between the decision to vote and the allowance to vote. There should be a federal background check for anyone that wants to vote. On the flip side - Let's have Vote Shows! Is that where I can buy votes with no restrictions? Only privately. Not from licensed vote dealers. Ah, yes, the "vote show loop hole".... Where felons can buy assault votes without background checks..."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 226 #16 July 24, 2016 jgoose71********* There should be a waiting period between the decision to vote and the allowance to vote. There should be a federal background check for anyone that wants to vote. On the flip side - Let's have Vote Shows! Is that where I can buy votes with no restrictions? Only privately. Not from licensed vote dealers. Ah, yes, the "vote show loop hole".... Where felons can buy assault votes without background checks... ...and 30 vote magazines!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 348 #17 July 25, 2016 no one should be surprised. I am pretty sure that Texas leads the country tenfold on violations of the VRA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #18 July 25, 2016 tkhayesno one should be surprised. I am pretty sure that Texas leads the country tenfold on violations of the VRA. When it comes to dis-honest voting I am sure IL and Chicago lead the pack."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 858 #19 July 25, 2016 Much more so in Republican led states where they take away voting rights for felons. Gotta continue the gerrymandering to keep the brothers down man. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #20 July 25, 2016 rushmc***no one should be surprised. I am pretty sure that Texas leads the country tenfold on violations of the VRA. When it comes to dis-honest voting I am sure IL and Chicago lead the pack. What is dis-honest voting? Is that when you vote for the candidate Rush doesn't like? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #21 July 25, 2016 SkyDekker******no one should be surprised. I am pretty sure that Texas leads the country tenfold on violations of the VRA. When it comes to dis-honest voting I am sure IL and Chicago lead the pack. What is dis-honest voting? Is that when you vote for the candidate Rush doesn't like? Dead people voting. Do you think that is OK? and you are on a roll this AM Have a bad weekend? (not that you ever come across as happy!)"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #22 July 25, 2016 QuoteDead people voting Dead people voting isn't dishonest, it is impossible. Unless you meant impersonating a person who is actually dead, which would be a little beyond dishonest and into the criminal sphere. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #23 July 25, 2016 SkyDekkerQuoteDead people voting Dead people voting isn't dishonest, it is impossible. Unless you meant impersonating a person who is actually dead, which would be a little beyond dishonest and into the criminal sphere. Ah No, that has not been the case in many areas. Why do you think so many places are trying to put into place laws that keep the voting cleaner? And if you say they are just doing that because they want to suppress some votes all I would say is, you are drinking too much of the cool aid."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #24 July 25, 2016 rushmc***no one should be surprised. I am pretty sure that Texas leads the country tenfold on violations of the VRA. When it comes to dis-honest voting I am sure IL and Chicago lead the pack. Truthiness strikes again.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,108 #25 July 25, 2016 rushmc*********no one should be surprised. I am pretty sure that Texas leads the country tenfold on violations of the VRA. When it comes to dis-honest voting I am sure IL and Chicago lead the pack. What is dis-honest voting? Is that when you vote for the candidate Rush doesn't like? Dead people voting. Do you think that is OK? Which article of the Constitution prohibits it?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites