winsor 236 #76 October 13, 2016 Rstanley0312 The GOP only has itself to blame. The primary voters themselves were warned by many to no avail. The irony here is that Clinton is weak and unliked. The Dems have no bench and can only muster very old white candidates. That is still the case really... their bench moving forward is terrible while the GOP bench is great, full of young and diverse people. This should have been an easy election for the right and they blew it bc of stupidity. The party elites screwed up by throwing all money behind Jeb!. What a shit show....... I think Hillary is really a moderate and this rhetoric was forced on her by first Obama and then Bernie. She will be staus quo with some damage. I think she is a terrible human being but not as scary as Cheeto boy. I still will not vote for either. As far as Hillary being a 'moderate,' look at her track record in College - before going under the radar after graduation. Again, I equate being an avowed Marxist/Communist as being on a par with sexual attraction to barnyard animals. If either EVER seemed appealing, claims to have 'gotten over it' fall on deaf ears. When I read Marx, Lenin et al. those many years ago, I concluded that anyone who could buy into this has something severely wrong with them. Going to various Socialist Workers' Paradises thereafter only strengthened that conviction. You could call Hillary a variety of things, but 'moderate' would be one of the least accurate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,106 #77 October 13, 2016 Well, it appears that Hillary didn't lose $6 Billion after all. Another lie from the Great Right Wing Lie Machine: www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/13/trumps-false-claim-that-clinton-lost-6-billion-at-state/?wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1 Bottom line: The $6 billion was not lost or misplaced; it’s that $6 billion in contracts had missing paperwork. On top of that, the majority of contracts with missing or incomplete paperwork stemmed from the Bush administration, before Clinton became secretary of state. ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #78 October 13, 2016 kallend Well, it appears that Hillary didn't lose $6 Billion after all. Another lie from the Great Right Wing Lie Machine: www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/13/trumps-false-claim-that-clinton-lost-6-billion-at-state/?wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1 Bottom line: The $6 billion was not lost or misplaced; it’s that $6 billion in contracts had missing paperwork. On top of that, the majority of contracts with missing or incomplete paperwork stemmed from the Bush administration, before Clinton became secretary of state. Since she's an attorney by training it follows that she is mathematically illiterate, so I do not sweat her accounting skills either way. My concern is that she is an evil piece of shit whose goal would seem to be to make Dick Nixon look like a study in honesty and decency by comparison. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,436 #79 October 13, 2016 Hi winsor, Quote she's an attorney by training it follows that she is mathematically illiterate I have known a fair number of attorneys who have engineering degrees. Your generalization ( IMO ) regarding attorneys is where you lose your argument. I used to think you had something pretty darn good to say; I no longer have any regard for your posts. It seems as though you have simply gone off of the deep end. Jerry Baumchen PS) Worse than Nixon? Now, that is a real laugher. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rstanley0312 1 #80 October 13, 2016 winsor *** The GOP only has itself to blame. The primary voters themselves were warned by many to no avail. The irony here is that Clinton is weak and unliked. The Dems have no bench and can only muster very old white candidates. That is still the case really... their bench moving forward is terrible while the GOP bench is great, full of young and diverse people. This should have been an easy election for the right and they blew it bc of stupidity. The party elites screwed up by throwing all money behind Jeb!. What a shit show....... I think Hillary is really a moderate and this rhetoric was forced on her by first Obama and then Bernie. She will be staus quo with some damage. I think she is a terrible human being but not as scary as Cheeto boy. I still will not vote for either. As far as Hillary being a 'moderate,' look at her track record in College - before going under the radar after graduation. Again, I equate being an avowed Marxist/Communist as being on a par with sexual attraction to barnyard animals. If either EVER seemed appealing, claims to have 'gotten over it' fall on deaf ears. When I read Marx, Lenin et al. those many years ago, I concluded that anyone who could buy into this has something severely wrong with them. Going to various Socialist Workers' Paradises thereafter only strengthened that conviction. You could call Hillary a variety of things, but 'moderate' would be one of the least accurate. Based on leaked private speeches I think she is more moderate than you think. It doesn't matter at this point. As soon as the GOP put Trump in it was a lock that we would get HRC as prez.Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rstanley0312 1 #81 October 13, 2016 Iago *********Hi jclalor, Quote Trumps election night concession speech I was thinking about this last night. I am thinking he will not concede. So, I thought, 'What happens then?' I am guessing it would be up to the RNC to concede. Anyone??????? Jerry Baumchen It was interesting today at the Pence rally, where a Trump supporter said she was willing to start a revolution if Clinton wins. (Although later she clarified that she would only be able to revolt if her hip gets done by January.) Pence looked like he would rather be anyplace else on the planet than where he was. The GOP only has itself to blame. The primary voters themselves were warned by many to no avail. The irony here is that Clinton is weak and unliked. The Dems have no bench and can only muster very old white candidates. That is still the case really... their bench moving forward is terrible while the GOP bench is great, full of young and diverse people. This should have been an easy election for the right and they blew it bc of stupidity. The party elites screwed up by throwing all money behind Jeb!. What a shit show....... I think Hillary is really a moderate and this rhetoric was forced on her by first Obama and then Bernie. She will be staus quo with some damage. I think she is a terrible human being but not as scary as Cheeto boy. I still will not vote for either. Then please, please, please vote your heart and your conscious for a third party that fits your ideals. No, they will not win. However, if a party breaks 5% in a general presidential election they become eligible for federal campaign funding which immediately puts them about $90 Million in the black. If everyone who said 'I really like XYZ but they're just not going to win' actually voted for XYZ, XYZ then becomes a contender. That is the way I have been voting since Trump got the nod. I am voting for something I believe in... a 3rd party getting 5% + so they get funding next cycle.Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,070 #82 October 13, 2016 > I am voting for something I believe in... a 3rd party getting 5% + so they get >funding next cycle. Me too. My vote will not affect the result of the vote in my state, but I can put my vote behind a third party so that there will be more of a choice in the next election. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rstanley0312 1 #83 October 14, 2016 billvon > I am voting for something I believe in... a 3rd party getting 5% + so they get >funding next cycle. Me too. My vote will not affect the result of the vote in my state, but I can put my vote behind a third party so that there will be more of a choice in the next election. Principles above all else!Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #84 December 8, 2016 normiss But then we would be forced to have funerals for aborted fetuses. He's crazier than Trump on a number of issues, if that's actually possible. It canhttp://etcanada.com/news/186643/sofia-vergaras-lawyer-responds-to-right-to-live-lawsuit-filed-by-fertilized-eggs/"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 851 #85 December 8, 2016 Your comment, as usual, makes no sense in any way. I would expect this new lawsuit to result pretty much the way it did the first time he sued, due to a signed contract. I don't understand how nor why you feel it is related to human tissue burial laws. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #86 December 8, 2016 normiss Your comment, as usual, makes no sense in any way. I would expect this new lawsuit to result pretty much the way it did the first time he sued, due to a signed contract. I don't understand how nor why you feel it is related to human tissue burial laws. I replied to Quote if that's actually possible. But then you don't care......"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 851 #87 December 8, 2016 So what does your comment have to do with Pence's amount of crazy? Not that I expect you to make sense of it though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,563 #88 December 8, 2016 rushmc ***Your comment, as usual, makes no sense in any way. I would expect this new lawsuit to result pretty much the way it did the first time he sued, due to a signed contract. I don't understand how nor why you feel it is related to human tissue burial laws. I replied to Quote if that's actually possible. But then you don't care...... That still doesn't make any sense. Speak the words out loud and see if they follow. "If that's actually possible." "It can." Nope, that's simply not how english works. No-one can understand you when you don't bother to use the language correctly, and it's your fault. Not that you fucking careDo you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
