0
434

Would you vote for Michelle Obama?

Recommended Posts

434

Would you vote for Michelle Obama instead of the two running candidates?



Do we want this country to be a democracy, or an oligarchy?

We already limit ourselves to a 2 party, one occupation (lawyers) system. And those two political parties are in danger of being run by just two families. (i.e the Clinton family and the Bush family).

Think about this. Hillary Clinton is going to win this election. And after the end of her first 4 year term, in the past 30 years, 22 of those years we had only a Bush or a Clinton in office.

We are a country of 350 million people, how is it that our political system limits us to such a small sub-set of those people, and our presidential selection process is so screwed up that only the most narcissistic people win?

Regardless of if your left, right or center, something it very broken about our presidential primary system.

A good first start IMHO is to never elect someone from the same family to the highest position in the land. Once someone name Bush or Clinton is elected too office, no other person from the same family should be eligible for that post ever. (OK maybe just 3 generations)

If we do that we now have 350 million - (about a dozen) people to select from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DanG

Quote

She's part of the DNC and the DNC are sick fucks who pay people to incite violence for their political gains.



Are you going to try and work this into every thread?



Sure why not. You aren't the least bit disturbed that the DNC that you dearly love and are so proud to defend day in and day out for hours on end uses violence to gain power? But don't worry I will be going silent now. I'm off to work and when I am at work these days I am actually working. I am not trolling the Dork Zone all day long. Yes I know in a prior life I may have spent far too much time here. But not these days. These days I actually work while the rest of the Dork Zone trolls spend their day trolling.

So have fun worshiping and defend that criminal organization you love so much. Just be prepared. Later today Project Veritas will be releasing Part II. That's assuming of course that James O'Keefe doesn't decide to commit suicide sometime during the day. It would be tragic if he was to just lose it, decide that life was not worth living anymore, put a gun to the back of his head and pull the trigger (funny how that can happen to people with insider knowledge of the Clinton criminal empire). Yeah Part II could be a doozy. I wonder what James has? See you tonight I guess. Trump may be a Jackass, but the DNC are pure evil low life lying scum.


Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You really need to do a little research on your hero, James O'Keefe. Based on his past actions, the chances that these new videos are not doctored or edited is near zero.

Of course, since he's telling you what you already believe you'll buy anything he says, but the rest of us look at him like the clown he is.

- Dan G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DanG

You really need to do a little research on your hero, James O'Keefe. Based on his past actions, the chances that these new videos are not doctored or edited is near zero.

Of course, since he's telling you what you already believe you'll buy anything he says, but the rest of us look at him like the clown he is.



ROFLMAO ... right ... this video is a fake. Every WikiLeaks document is a fake. Got it. B|


Try not to worry about the things you have no control over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice CRIMINAL source you use:

James O'Keefe:

Criminal conviction (2010)
O'Keefe, along with accomplices Joseph Basel, Stan Dai, and Robert Flanagan, the son of William Flanagan, acting U.S. Attorney of the Eastern District of Louisiana at the time, were arrested in New Orleans in January 2010 during an attempt to illegally make recordings at the office of United States Senator Mary Landrieu, a Democrat. The four were apprehended, with two of them dressed as telephone repairmen.[

The four men were initially charged with malicious intent to damage the phone system, a felony. O'Keefe claimed he entered Landrieu's office to investigate complaints that she was ignoring phone calls from constituents during the debate over the Affordable Care Act bill. The charges in the case were reduced from a felony to a single misdemeanor count of entering a federal building under false pretenses. O'Keefe and the others pleaded guilty on May 26. O'Keefe was sentenced to three years' probation, 100 hours of community service and a $1,500 fine. The other three men received lesser sentences.

And concerning O'Keefe's vile attempts to smear ACORN with doctored tapes and the subsequent lawsuit against him:

O'Keefe moved for summary judgment in his favor, arguing that the plaintiff had no reasonable expectation that the conversation would be private. In August 2012, the federal judge hearing the case denied O'Keefe's motion for summary judgment. The judge ruled that O'Keefe had "misled plaintiff to believe that the conversation would remain confidential by posing as a client seeking services from ACORN and asking whether their conversation was confidential." On March 5, 2013, O'Keefe agreed to pay Vera $100,000 and acknowledged in the settlement that at the time he published his video he was unaware that Vera had notified the police about the incident. The settlement contained the following apology: "O'Keefe regrets any pain suffered by Mr. Vera or his family."

On June 14, 2010, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) published its report finding no evidence that ACORN, or any of its related organizations, had mishandled any of the $40 million in federal money which they had received in recent years.


Seems like you hitched your wagon to a lying demonic nag rather than a white horse.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AlanS

A good first start IMHO is to never elect someone from the same family to the highest position in the land. Once someone name Bush or Clinton is elected too office, no other person from the same family should be eligible for that post ever. (OK maybe just 3 generations)



that's really horrible - we're a nation of individuals, not a nation of families. that's really cosmetic

disqualifying someone SOLELY because of who their brother, father, spouse is? REALLY?

if someone like that runs and we show for that individual that they have undue and inappropriate influence as a result of their connections, that's one thing. just assuming it without proof?

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DanG

You just really want to see Billy Carter make a run for President.



he'd stand a chance in 2016 considering DonHillaldery

it'd been extra funny since a Billy president would still have a bat shit crazy brother

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rehmwa

***You just really want to see Billy Carter make a run for President.



he'd stand a chance in 2016 considering DonHillaldery

it'd been extra funny since a Billy president would still have a bat shit crazy brother

Considering that he died of Pancreatic Cancer in 1988, I doubt he would be interested in running.

He'd still be a better pick than Trump.
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe

******You just really want to see Billy Carter make a run for President.



he'd stand a chance in 2016 considering DonHillaldery

it'd been extra funny since a Billy president would still have a bat shit crazy brother

Considering that he died of Pancreatic Cancer in 1988, I doubt he would be interested in running.

He'd still be a better pick than Trump.

I don't see anything in the Constitution or 25th Amendment that says a dead person can't be elected President. The 25th addresses a president's dying while in office.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend

*********You just really want to see Billy Carter make a run for President.



he'd stand a chance in 2016 considering DonHillaldery

it'd been extra funny since a Billy president would still have a bat shit crazy brother

Considering that he died of Pancreatic Cancer in 1988, I doubt he would be interested in running.

He'd still be a better pick than Trump.

I don't see anything in the Constitution or 25th Amendment that says a dead person can't be elected President. The 25th addresses a president's dying while in office.

Very true Professor. I didn't say he couldn't be nominated or elected.

I said I doubted he was interested in running for office. Being dead for 28 years, I kinda doubt he's interested in anything. Unless he comes back as a zombie, in which case his primary focus would be "brains."

And again, Billy Carter (zombie or decayed corpse) would still be a better pick than Trump.
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> I kinda doubt he's interested in anything. Unless he comes back as a zombie, in
> which case his primary focus would be "brains."

Would he be a fast zombie or a slow zombie? The slow ones seem easier to corral. Imagine trying to get a fast zombie to stay still long enough for a state dinner or press conference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe

And again, Billy Carter (zombie or decayed corpse) would still be a better pick than Trump.



AGREED - he'd also be less corrupt, and smell better than Hillary

but, sadly, I don't think he has time to get on the ballot.....

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kallend



I don't see anything in the Constitution or 25th Amendment that says a dead person can't be elected President. The 25th addresses a president's dying while in office.



Well, in that case I nominate Abe Vigoda!B|
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe

************You just really want to see Billy Carter make a run for President.



he'd stand a chance in 2016 considering DonHillaldery

it'd been extra funny since a Billy president would still have a bat shit crazy brother

Considering that he died of Pancreatic Cancer in 1988, I doubt he would be interested in running.

He'd still be a better pick than Trump.

I don't see anything in the Constitution or 25th Amendment that says a dead person can't be elected President. The 25th addresses a president's dying while in office.

Very true Professor. I didn't say he couldn't be nominated or elected.

I said I doubted he was interested in running for office. Being dead for 28 years, I kinda doubt he's interested in anything. Unless he comes back as a zombie, in which case his primary focus would be "brains."

And again, Billy Carter (zombie or decayed corpse) would still be a better pick than Trump.

Just trying to be helpful here. :)
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quade

Michelle vs Hillary isn't even a contest. Hillary is more qualified.

Michelle vs Trump also isn't a contest. Michelle isn't insane.



I wish people would stop with this "more qualified" (or most/best/whatever) misleading crap. I'm sure John Stumpf could be considered more/most/best "qualified" for a CEO position, but that doesn't mean anyone really wants him to be a CEO anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Elisha

***Michelle vs Hillary isn't even a contest. Hillary is more qualified.

Michelle vs Trump also isn't a contest. Michelle isn't insane.



I wish people would stop with this "more qualified" (or most/best/whatever) misleading crap. I'm sure John Stumpf could be considered more/most/best "qualified" for a CEO position, but that doesn't mean anyone really wants him to be a CEO anymore.

I'm unclear what you're even attempting to say. Hillary has been in politics for a long time. Has served as a Senator and Secretary of State. Was in the situation room as Secretary of State sitting beside the President when Bin Laden was was killed.

It's not a matter of the subjective. Hillary is OBJECTIVELY more qualified than Trump to be President. There's nothing misleading about it whatsoever.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quade

******Michelle vs Hillary isn't even a contest. Hillary is more qualified.

Michelle vs Trump also isn't a contest. Michelle isn't insane.



I wish people would stop with this "more qualified" (or most/best/whatever) misleading crap. I'm sure John Stumpf could be considered more/most/best "qualified" for a CEO position, but that doesn't mean anyone really wants him to be a CEO anymore.

I'm unclear what you're even attempting to say. Hillary has been in politics for a long time. Has served as a Senator and Secretary of State. Was in the situation room as Secretary of State sitting beside the President when Bin Laden was was killed.

It's not a matter of the subjective. Hillary is OBJECTIVELY more qualified than Trump to be President. There's nothing misleading about it whatsoever.

No one gives a crap about qualifications if the person is corrupt as death. No idea about what I'm saying? You must not read the news regarding Wells Fargo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0