jgoose71 0 #26 December 1, 2016 SkyDekker ***No more ludacris than Jill Stein's claim, now backed by Hillary!!! We better have a recount! Even though the machines are not hooked up to the internet and after you take into account the demographics of the areas Trump won, there are no anomalies, there is the off chance that if someone had access to the voting machines that they could have been tampered with... But there is no proof, but we better have a recount anyway just to be safe.... I wonder why they are only doing the recount in states that Trump won? There is no proof of widespread voter fraud, yet you have championed voter registration laws, just in case, cause it could happen, etc. Now all of a sudden you are concerned about proof? Coming from the party that is actually doing a recount because of suspected fraud? That is rich...."There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss." Life, the Universe, and Everything Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #27 December 1, 2016 I am not supporting the recount, at all. Just wondering why you don't support it? As stated before, you have previously strongly maintained that laws had to be enacted just because their might be voter fraud, all evidence to the contrary. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,362 #28 December 1, 2016 Hi joose, QuoteComing from the party that is actually doing a recount And just what party is DOING a recount? Here in Oregon the voting & any recounting are under the purvue of the Sec. of State. Hmmmmmm, Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #29 December 1, 2016 jgoose71 Coming from the party that is actually doing a recount because of suspected fraud? That is rich.... SkyDekker is a member of the Green party?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
