rushmc 23 #2626 May 10, 2018 Do you ever get embarrassed when you post this stuff and it turns out to be bullshit like the last post you made?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2627 May 10, 2018 It's so sad that you have to throw your ass out there so fast for the anti Trump, trump hater, anti-republican BS that you throw out constantly now. At least it's out there for everybody to see. And that's a good thing."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,006 #2628 May 10, 2018 The latest payback to Putin: Russia's state TV (in a panel discussion) asks where Putin will find 8 trillion rubles to implement Putin's agenda. The answer: "Looks like we found it. Trump is withdrawing US from the Iran nuclear deal. Oil prices should go up, which is good for us." The millions Putin invested in the attacks on the US presidential election will turn out to be the best money he ever spent. Congratulations, Trump supporters, Trump's master is very happy today. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2629 May 10, 2018 billvon The latest payback to Putin: Russia's state TV (in a panel discussion) asks where Putin will find 8 trillion rubles to implement Putin's agenda. The answer: "Looks like we found it. Trump is withdrawing US from the Iran nuclear deal. Oil prices should go up, which is good for us." The millions Putin invested in the attacks on the US presidential election will turn out to be the best money he ever spent. Congratulations, Trump supporters, Trump's master is very happy today. Incredible show of desperationIncredible show of desperation"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,006 #2630 May 10, 2018 There's a question on whether Trump has to testify if called by the special prosecutor. What did Giuliani have to say about that? Interviewer asked him what would happen if the president refused to testify. His answer: “Then there is a procedure for handling that. You go before a judge and a judge decides whether or not he has a recognizable exemption or privilege from testifying. And if a judge decides that he doesn’t, you have to testify. You don’t have a choice about it.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #2631 May 10, 2018 billvonThere's a question on whether Trump has to testify if called by the special prosecutor. What did Giuliani have to say about that? Interviewer asked him what would happen if the president refused to testify. His answer: “Then there is a procedure for handling that. You go before a judge and a judge decides whether or not he has a recognizable exemption or privilege from testifying. And if a judge decides that he doesn’t, you have to testify. You don’t have a choice about it.” As long as it's not a Mexican judge. Obvs.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 333 #2632 May 10, 2018 billvonThere's a question on whether Trump has to testify if called by the special prosecutor. What did Giuliani have to say about that? Interviewer asked him what would happen if the president refused to testify. His answer: “Then there is a procedure for handling that. You go before a judge and a judge decides whether or not he has a recognizable exemption or privilege from testifying. And if a judge decides that he doesn’t, you have to testify. You don’t have a choice about it.” Well, he said that nearly 20 years ago w.r.t. Clinton. Obviously the current President could just choose. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2633 May 10, 2018 billvonThere's a question on whether Trump has to testify if called by the special prosecutor. What did Giuliani have to say about that? Interviewer asked him what would happen if the president refused to testify. His answer: “Then there is a procedure for handling that. You go before a judge and a judge decides whether or not he has a recognizable exemption or privilege from testifying. And if a judge decides that he doesn’t, you have to testify. You don’t have a choice about it.” The doj and the Supreme Court both have an opinion on that. And both of them say no he does not have to go. And why the hell would he want to go really? All he's setting himself up for is it processed rap like scooter Libby got caught in! The whole investigation is a bunch of shit and it's illegal and it needs to end!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2634 May 10, 2018 Damn! I have more respect for this President than any since Reagan. Things are going great and they're going to get better."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyhays 86 #2635 May 11, 2018 QuoteThe doj and the Supreme Court both have an opinion on that. And both of them say no he does not have to go. "Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)[1], was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation, in federal court, against him or her, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office. In particular, there is no temporary immunity, so it is not required to delay all federal cases until the President leaves office." The decision was unanimous. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_v._Jones“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #2636 May 11, 2018 QuoteThe whole investigation is a bunch of shit and it's illegal and it needs to end! So why did the Trump administration instigate it? Why is the Republican the Trump administration chose to run it such a bad appointment?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 333 #2637 May 11, 2018 Giuliani's law firm just made him resign. Should be about time for Trump to turn on him. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #2638 May 11, 2018 headoverheelsGiuliani's law firm just made him resign. Should be about time for Trump to turn on him. So the last lawyer is the subject of investigation. His lead replacement is fired from his law firm. Anything that touches trump is corrupted. Then Pence, Rushmc, Fox, et al, are all calling for the republican led investigations to end. There are still honest republicans who stand up for the USA. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #2639 May 11, 2018 Phil1111***Giuliani's law firm just made him resign. Should be about time for Trump to turn on him. So the last lawyer is the subject of investigation. His lead replacement is fired from his law firm. Anything that touches trump is corrupted. Then Pence, Rushmc, Fox, et al, are all calling for the republican led investigations to end. There are still honest republicans who stand up for the USA. They didn't fire him. I doubt they wanted Trump's flavor of attention towards the law firm and wanted to ensure there was no appearance of their resources going into the case but that's very different from terminating his employment for cause."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,006 #2640 May 11, 2018 >So why did the Trump administration instigate it? He thought they could control it and direct it to reach the conclusions he desired. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2641 May 11, 2018 tonyhaysQuoteThe doj and the Supreme Court both have an opinion on that. And both of them say no he does not have to go. "Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)[1], was a landmark United States Supreme Court case establishing that a sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation, in federal court, against him or her, for acts done before taking office and unrelated to the office. In particular, there is no temporary immunity, so it is not required to delay all federal cases until the President leaves office." The decision was unanimous. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_v._Jones What you post is correct. But that has nothing to do with what I said. The DOJ in the Supreme Court both have the same opinion that is sitting president cannot be indicted. They can only be removed from office through impeachment! They also cannot be made to testify before a grand jury while in office."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2642 May 11, 2018 jakeeQuoteThe whole investigation is a bunch of shit and it's illegal and it needs to end! So why did the Trump administration instigate it? Why is the Republican the Trump administration chose to run it such a bad appointment? The Trump administration did not instigate the special counsel. Rosenstein did after a bogus letter from Comey. It appears now that those two were colluding to get that done. The information is out there in emails that are being collected under FOIA request in by Senate and House panels investigating this crap."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #2643 May 11, 2018 rushmcThe Trump administration did not instigate the special counsel. Rosenstein did Rosenstein is a Trump appointee. He is part of the Trump administration. Quoteafter a bogus letter What was bogus about it? Quotefrom Comey. Comey is a Republican. QuoteIt appears now that those two were colluding to get that done. A Republican Law Enforcement official colluding with a member of the Trump Administration to undermine Trump? Why do you think his own party hates him so much? QuoteThe information is out there in emails that are being collected under FOIA request in by Senate and House panels investigating this crap. So you're saying that you believe there is absolute proof that your party and the Administration you support are rotten from the inside and colluding against themselves? I thought you said that all of Trump's picks were stellar?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TriGirl 319 #2644 May 11, 2018 You forgot to add that the DoJ falls under the Executive Branch. Which is headed by...?See the upside, and always wear your parachute! -- Christopher Titus Shut Up & Jump! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,006 #2645 May 11, 2018 >You forgot to add that the DoJ falls under the Executive Branch. Which is headed by...? Some whiny loser liberal who would rather destroy the Constitution than help America's ally Putin out! Probably. He just has to look up what the Executive Branch is . . . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,006 #2646 May 11, 2018 No wonder RushMC et al are so desperate to stop Mueller before he uncovers anything else . . . . ================== Special counsel probing donations with foreign connections to Trump inauguration By JOHN SANTUCCI May 11, 2018, 11:44 AM ET ABC News Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team has questioned several witnesses about millions of dollars in donations to President Donald Trump’s inauguration committee last year, including questions about donors with connections to Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, sources with direct knowledge told ABC News. Those interviewed included longtime Trump friend and confidant Thomas Barrack, who oversaw the fundraising effort, as well as individuals familiar with the massive inaugural fund, according to sources with direct knowledge. Barrack, a real estate investor, has long been described as a Trump “whisperer” whose close friendship with the president landed him a prime appearance during the GOP convention the night Trump accepted his party’s nomination. The billionaire runs a fund with hundreds of millions in real estate and private equity holdings in the Middle East. Barrack oversaw the largest inaugural fundraising effort in U.S. history, bringing in $107 million – more than double what President Barack Obama raised for his first swearing-in festivities. According to a source who has sat with the Mueller team for interviews in recent weeks, the special counsel is examining donors who have either business or personal connections in Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Several donors with those ties contributed large sums to the non-profit fundraising entity – gifts that topped out at $1 million dollars, according to public records. ================== Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #2647 May 11, 2018 QuoteThe billionaire runs a fund with hundreds of millions in real estate and private equity holdings in the Middle East. Barrack oversaw the largest inaugural fundraising effort in U.S. history, bringing in $107 million – more than double what President Barack Obama raised for his first swearing-in festivities. And yet the inauguration itself didn't cost appreciably more, and the administrators of the fund haven't released any details of how much excess rhere was and where it went... Quotethe special counsel is examining donors who have either business or personal connections in Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Several donors with those ties contributed large sums to the non-profit fundraising entity – gifts that topped out at $1 million dollars, according to public records. And thanks to the Republican party and its supporters a few years ago, we all know that donations to a non-profit associated with a prominent politician are absolute, 100% evidence of a "pay to play" relationship. They couldn't possibly backtrack on that now, could they?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2648 May 12, 2018 billvonNo wonder RushMC et al are so desperate to stop Mueller before he uncovers anything else . . . . ================== Special counsel probing donations with foreign connections to Trump inauguration By JOHN SANTUCCI May 11, 2018, 11:44 AM ET ABC News Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team has questioned several witnesses about millions of dollars in donations to President Donald Trump’s inauguration committee last year, including questions about donors with connections to Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, sources with direct knowledge told ABC News. Those interviewed included longtime Trump friend and confidant Thomas Barrack, who oversaw the fundraising effort, as well as individuals familiar with the massive inaugural fund, according to sources with direct knowledge. Barrack, a real estate investor, has long been described as a Trump “whisperer” whose close friendship with the president landed him a prime appearance during the GOP convention the night Trump accepted his party’s nomination. The billionaire runs a fund with hundreds of millions in real estate and private equity holdings in the Middle East. Barrack oversaw the largest inaugural fundraising effort in U.S. history, bringing in $107 million – more than double what President Barack Obama raised for his first swearing-in festivities. According to a source who has sat with the Mueller team for interviews in recent weeks, the special counsel is examining donors who have either business or personal connections in Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Several donors with those ties contributed large sums to the non-profit fundraising entity – gifts that topped out at $1 million dollars, according to public records. ================== I don’t have to be desperate at all. A federal judges gonna shut this down before too long in my opinion."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2649 May 12, 2018 You keep using your liberal left-wing media sources and very few of them if any have been true to this point. But you want to believe it so bad you keep posting them. As I said, the entertainment of this thread has been ongoing for quite some time."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2650 May 12, 2018 TriGirlYou forgot to add that the DoJ falls under the Executive Branch. Which is headed by...? And so many of those that you talk about hate Trump. You need to get media sources are more varied then you look at today."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites