LeeroyJenkins 3 #2901 June 8, 2018 okalb ******You need to look at the charges they played guilty to and when, date-wise, they supposedly committed those crimes. This thing's a farce and it has been since the get go. At this point I'm starting to believe it was even a setup! Could you address my comment? Hahaha...you must be new here I'm pretty good at politics. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #2902 June 8, 2018 okalb ******You need to look at the charges they played guilty to and when, date-wise, they supposedly committed those crimes. This thing's a farce and it has been since the get go. At this point I'm starting to believe it was even a setup! Could you address my comment? Hahaha...you must be new here You have to wait a day or so till Fox news, Breitbart, or someone on Facebook gives Marc a lie to explain that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2903 June 8, 2018 Nope, that's not what I'm saying. But what I am saying is you could give a squirt last about the truth. You just love you talking points!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,998 #2904 June 8, 2018 This latest indictment charges that Manafort was colluding with a Russian (Konstantin Kilimnik) to obstruct justice by tampering with a witness. But remember there's NO COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA! No matter what the facts say! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,998 #2905 June 8, 2018 Quote***If charges are recommended/filed against more Trump campaign people/administration officials or even Trump himself, would you still believe the counter intelligence investigation had political motives? At this point, I am fairly confident there will be none! Wow, your latest prediction didn't even last a day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #2906 June 8, 2018 rushmcNope, that's not what I'm saying. But what I am saying is you could give a squirt last about the truth. You just love you talking points! That is exactly what you said, it's even quoted for you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2907 June 9, 2018 billvonQuote***If charges are recommended/filed against more Trump campaign people/administration officials or even Trump himself, would you still believe the counter intelligence investigation had political motives? At this point, I am fairly confident there will be none! Wow, your latest prediction didn't even last a day. Oh how quickly you moved from an accusation to a conviction! But then, we've learned a long time ago that with the left the accusation means way more than the evidence!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2908 June 9, 2018 SkyDekker***Nope, that's not what I'm saying. But what I am saying is you could give a squirt last about the truth. You just love you talking points! That is exactly what you said, it's even quoted for you. You can't even acknowledge your own twist! Color me not surprised."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #2909 June 9, 2018 rushmc***Quote***If charges are recommended/filed against more Trump campaign people/administration officials or even Trump himself, would you still believe the counter intelligence investigation had political motives? At this point, I am fairly confident there will be none! Wow, your latest prediction didn't even last a day. Oh how quickly you moved from an accusation to a conviction! But then, we've learned a long time ago that with the left the accusation means way more than the evidence! As usual, your reading comprehension sucks.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #2910 June 9, 2018 rushmcBut then, we've learned a long time ago that with the left the accusation means way more than the evidence! I'm sure we can check your post history and find all of the times when you've defended Clinton from all of the baseless accusations from the right. Unless, of course, you're practicing hypocrisy. Mueller's investigation, on the other hand, has already resulted in multiple indictments and guilty pleas, so cannot be credibly claimed to be a witch hunt, at least not without extraordinary evidence supporting such a claim.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #2911 June 9, 2018 As of today, 20 individual witches and three wiccan businesses have either been indicted or admitted guilt and a total of 75 charges filed by the year-old inquiry into Russian interference into the US election.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #2912 June 9, 2018 jcd11235***But then, we've learned a long time ago that with the left the accusation means way more than the evidence! I'm sure we can check your post history and find all of the times when you've defended Clinton from all of the baseless accusations from the right. Unless, of course, you're practicing hypocrisy. Mueller's investigation, on the other hand, has already resulted in multiple indictments and guilty pleas, so cannot be credibly claimed to be a witch hunt, at least not without extraordinary evidence supporting such a claim. A quick search of the archive will show how fervently Marc defended Obama from the Trumpian accusation that he was born in Kenya.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,998 #2913 June 9, 2018 >As of today, 20 individual witches and three wiccan businesses have either been indicted >or admitted guilt and a total of 75 charges filed by the year-old inquiry into Russian >interference into the US election. And that's just in the first year. The Watergate investigation went on for seven years. If that's any guide, we're looking at over a hundred people indicted. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #2914 June 9, 2018 billvon >As of today, 20 individual witches and three wiccan businesses have either been indicted >or admitted guilt and a total of 75 charges filed by the year-old inquiry into Russian >interference into the US election. And that's just in the first year. The Watergate investigation went on for seven years. If that's any guide, we're looking at over a hundred people indicted. Who would have thunk it!! Such fertile ground for criminal investigations. No Russia, no collusion and no integrity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2915 June 9, 2018 jcd11235***But then, we've learned a long time ago that with the left the accusation means way more than the evidence! I'm sure we can check your post history and find all of the times when you've defended Clinton from all of the baseless accusations from the right. Unless, of course, you're practicing hypocrisy. Mueller's investigation, on the other hand, has already resulted in multiple indictments and guilty pleas, so cannot be credibly claimed to be a witch hunt, at least not without extraordinary evidence supporting such a claim. That's said and you have not one charge based on collusion during the campaign. You guys you can't look and see the evidence you're so lost in your hope that somehow they're going to get Trump it's pathetic! Remember, manafort's charges are all based on things that happened before he even joined the campaign let alone while he was there. It's a joke and everybody should be offended that this is even going on!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skinnay 0 #2916 June 10, 2018 rushmc******But then, we've learned a long time ago that with the left the accusation means way more than the evidence! I'm sure we can check your post history and find all of the times when you've defended Clinton from all of the baseless accusations from the right. Unless, of course, you're practicing hypocrisy. Mueller's investigation, on the other hand, has already resulted in multiple indictments and guilty pleas, so cannot be credibly claimed to be a witch hunt, at least not without extraordinary evidence supporting such a claim. That's said and you have not one charge based on collusion during the campaign. You guys you can't look and see the evidence you're so lost in your hope that somehow they're going to get Trump it's pathetic! Remember, manafort's charges are all based on things that happened before he even joined the campaign let alone while he was there. It's a joke and everybody should be offended that this is even going on! Yes we should all be so offended! How many guilty pleas do we have again? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,998 #2917 June 10, 2018 > Remember, manafort's charges are all based on things that happened before he even > joined the campaign . . . . Latest Manafort charges are for conspiring with a Russian in Feb of 2018. Is anything you post ever correct? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #2918 June 10, 2018 billvon > Remember, manafort's charges are all based on things that happened before he even > joined the campaign . . . . Latest Manafort charges are for conspiring with a Russian in Feb of 2018. Is anything you post ever correct? When your diet is Fox, Breitbart and Facebook feeds. You poop lies. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #2919 June 10, 2018 rushmc******But then, we've learned a long time ago that with the left the accusation means way more than the evidence! I'm sure we can check your post history and find all of the times when you've defended Clinton from all of the baseless accusations from the right. Unless, of course, you're practicing hypocrisy. Mueller's investigation, on the other hand, has already resulted in multiple indictments and guilty pleas, so cannot be credibly claimed to be a witch hunt, at least not without extraordinary evidence supporting such a claim. That's said and you have not one charge based on collusion during the campaign. You guys you can't look and see the evidence you're so lost in your hope that somehow they're going to get Trump it's pathetic! Remember, manafort's charges are all based on things that happened before he even joined the campaign let alone while he was there. It's a joke and everybody should be offended that this is even going on! What, exactly, did Monica Lewinski have to do with Whitewater? Were you similarly outraged that Ken Starr deviated from strictly investigating a real estate transaction but instead went on a "witch hunt"?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2920 June 10, 2018 billvon> Remember, manafort's charges are all based on things that happened before he even > joined the campaign . . . . Latest Manafort charges are for conspiring with a Russian in Feb of 2018. Is anything you post ever correct? Sorry Bill That charge is related to the earlier supposed crimes! This is a tampering with witnesses crime. Again, related back to the earlier claims Muller is making. Really Bill You can do better than this?!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeeroyJenkins 3 #2921 June 10, 2018 rushmc***> Remember, manafort's charges are all based on things that happened before he even > joined the campaign . . . . Latest Manafort charges are for conspiring with a Russian in Feb of 2018. Is anything you post ever correct? Sorry Bill That charge is related to the earlier supposed crimes! This is a tampering with witnesses crime. Again, related back to the earlier claims Muller is making. Really Bill You can do better than this?! You still never addressed my comment. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,500 #2922 June 10, 2018 rushmcThat charge is related to the earlier supposed crimes! It's related to them, but it isn't about them. QuoteThis is a tampering with witnesses crime. That happened very recently. So Manafort was involved in criminal conspiracies with Russians before the campagn, he was involved in criminal conspiracies with Russians after the campaign.... but it's ludicrous to even investigate the possibility that he or anyone else conspired with Russians during the campaign?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,998 #2923 June 11, 2018 jakeeSo Manafort was involved in criminal conspiracies with Russians before the campagn, he was involved in criminal conspiracies with Russians after the campaign.... but it's ludicrous to even investigate the possibility that he or anyone else conspired with Russians during the campaign? Of course. And when someone in his campaign is indicted due to their actions DURING the campaign, the right wing sound bite Trumpies will echo is "but it wasn't CONSPIRACY WITH THE RUSSIANS! It was only money laundering with the Russians! Lying liberals don't want to face FACTS!" And when someone is indicted due to lying to the FBI about the meeting with Russian intelligence, they will say "but conspiracy with Russians is NOT A CRIME and you can't be convicted for it! Lying liberals blah blah blah." And when someone IS convicted for that, they will say "but Trump didn't know! Lying liberals blah blah blah." At this point the facts effectively don't matter. All that matters is that Trump is protected from his actions, and that they can attack liberals. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #2924 June 11, 2018 billvon***So Manafort was involved in criminal conspiracies with Russians before the campagn, he was involved in criminal conspiracies with Russians after the campaign.... but it's ludicrous to even investigate the possibility that he or anyone else conspired with Russians during the campaign? Of course. And when someone in his campaign is indicted due to their actions DURING the campaign, the right wing sound bite Trumpies will echo is "but it wasn't CONSPIRACY WITH THE RUSSIANS! It was only money laundering with the Russians! Lying liberals don't want to face FACTS!" And when someone is indicted due to lying to the FBI about the meeting with Russian intelligence, they will say "but conspiracy with Russians is NOT A CRIME and you can't be convicted for it! Lying liberals blah blah blah." And when someone IS convicted for that, they will say "but Trump didn't know! Lying liberals blah blah blah." At this point the facts effectively don't matter. All that matters is that Trump is protected from his actions, and that they can attack liberals. You Trump derangement syndrome Believers live in a different time zone. Unbelievable. Not that I'm surprised because you're so clouded by your hopes that Trump won because he cluded with Russia. Not because Hillary was a piss-poor candidate!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 2,207 #2925 June 11, 2018 'cluding. Excellent new word. You will someday be remembered for coining new words. Trump is nothing but Putin's water boy.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites