normiss 800 #501 May 24, 2017 Israel Changes intel sharing rules Thanks to Trump's loose lips. Still a treasonous traitor IMO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #502 May 24, 2017 rushmc No evidence Bill. Zero, zilch, nada. You wouldn't admit the evidence if stood on its hind legs and bit you on the nose. (I doubt the CIA shares its information with Bill either, during an ongoing intelligence operation).... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #503 May 24, 2017 >You wouldn't admit the evidence if stood on its hind legs and bit you on the nose. "Nothing bit me on the nose." "Why is it such a big deal? Mosquitoes bite people on the nose all the time." "Clinton bit someone first." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #504 May 24, 2017 kallend*** No evidence Bill. Zero, zilch, nada. You wouldn't admit the evidence if stood on its hind legs and bit you on the nose. (I doubt the CIA shares its information with Bill either, during an ongoing intelligence operation). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLcMBnz9GWk"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #505 May 24, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKrlfqWzE4c"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #506 May 24, 2017 Ruskie, you have Charlie Daniels in your corner too. http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/charlie-daniels/charlie-danielss-open-letter-chuck-schumer-youve-opened-pandoras-box"I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #507 May 25, 2017 “It should be clear to everyone that Russia brazenly interfered in our 2016 presidential election process and that they undertook these activities despite our strong protest and explicit warnings that they not do so,”; Former CIA Director Brennan in sworn testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. Everyone except Marc Rush, it seems.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #508 May 25, 2017 kallend“It should be clear to everyone that Russia brazenly interfered in our 2016 presidential election process and that they undertook these activities despite our strong protest and explicit warnings that they not do so,”; Former CIA Director Brennan in sworn testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. Everyone except Marc Rush, it seems. No one, not even me is arguing that point. The link to Trump is another thing however. And the fact that their meddling did not affect the outcome is something you chose to ignore. Come on John, keep up."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #509 May 25, 2017 rushmc***“It should be clear to everyone that Russia brazenly interfered in our 2016 presidential election process and that they undertook these activities despite our strong protest and explicit warnings that they not do so,”; Former CIA Director Brennan in sworn testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. Everyone except Marc Rush, it seems. No one, not even me is arguing that point. The link to Trump is another thing however. And the fact that their meddling did not affect the outcome is something you chose to ignore. Come on John, keep up. So how do you explain hiring Flynn after both the acting AG and the outgoing president strongly advised against it? Stupidity, arrogance, or collusion?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #510 May 25, 2017 kallend******“It should be clear to everyone that Russia brazenly interfered in our 2016 presidential election process and that they undertook these activities despite our strong protest and explicit warnings that they not do so,”; Former CIA Director Brennan in sworn testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. Everyone except Marc Rush, it seems. No one, not even me is arguing that point. The link to Trump is another thing however. And the fact that their meddling did not affect the outcome is something you chose to ignore. Come on John, keep up. So how do you explain hiring Flynn after both the acting AG and the outgoing president strongly advised against it? Stupidity, arrogance, or collusion? That's not collusion. It's a combination of stupidity and arrogance, the same thing that resulted in Hillary's servers and emails getting hacked. Trump saw the warnings about Flynn the same way he saw comments about Rex Tillerson, that both had contact with Russians as a natural course in their former jobs. He does not/did not know the difference that makes someone "compromised"."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #511 May 25, 2017 >That's not collusion. It's a combination of stupidity and arrogance . . . Perhaps, and sadly that will be the Trump supporter's strongest argument. "Trump is too stupid to plan something like that!" In any case, the larger issue is no longer the degree of collusion - it is the attempt to obstruct the investigation. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #512 May 25, 2017 billvon>That's not collusion. It's a combination of stupidity and arrogance . . . Perhaps, and sadly that will be the Trump supporter's strongest argument. "Trump is too stupid to plan something like that!" In any case, the larger issue is no longer the degree of collusion - it is the attempt to obstruct the investigation. At some level its not possible to argue stupidity when Presidents, Attorney Generals, National Security Advisors, etc. are involved. Its like saying a PhD in philosophy would have to know the nationality of Aristotle and who he is. But obviously this is a different administration with unique talents. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #513 May 25, 2017 billvon >That's not collusion. It's a combination of stupidity and arrogance . . . Perhaps, and sadly that will be the Trump supporter's strongest argument. "Trump is too stupid to plan something like that!" In any case, the larger issue is no longer the degree of collusion - it is the attempt to obstruct the investigation. Wrong again"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,027 #514 May 25, 2017 rushmc ***>That's not collusion. It's a combination of stupidity and arrogance . . . Perhaps, and sadly that will be the Trump supporter's strongest argument. "Trump is too stupid to plan something like that!" In any case, the larger issue is no longer the degree of collusion - it is the attempt to obstruct the investigation. Wrong againSo what is it? You've been dodging the question for over a week.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #515 May 25, 2017 kallend ******>That's not collusion. It's a combination of stupidity and arrogance . . . Perhaps, and sadly that will be the Trump supporter's strongest argument. "Trump is too stupid to plan something like that!" In any case, the larger issue is no longer the degree of collusion - it is the attempt to obstruct the investigation. Wrong againSo what is it? You've been dodging the question for over a week. First off, what question? Second I have asked repeatedly Do you believe that Russian attempts to meddle had nothing to do with election outcome? As stated by many in the intel community..."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yoink 321 #516 May 25, 2017 Do you think that Russian interference should only be investigated or prosecuted if it actually had an effect? Hypothetically, how would that conversation go? "OK, we know you colluded with the Russian government to influence the election but since you would have won anyway we'll just let it go." ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 800 #517 May 25, 2017 I was under the impression he has dodged questions since he first started posting in here. Not really sure these days as I scroll past ignoring him. Complete waste of time and logic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #518 May 25, 2017 Quote Do you think that Russian interference should only be investigated or prosecuted if it actually had an effect? Hypothetically, how would that conversation go? "OK, we know you colluded with the Russian government to influence the election but since you would have won anyway we'll just let it go." ? Duh. Obviously attempted murder shouldn't be prosecuted either. It's only a crime if you're successful. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #519 May 25, 2017 QuoteDo you believe that Russian attempts to meddle had nothing to do with election outcome? As stated by many in the intel community... Nobody here is capable of answering that question with anything more than an allegorical response. I had friends who are Republicans who didn't vote for Trump but didn't vote for Hillary citing the arrogance at which treated the security of her server. I have Democratic friends who didn't vote for her because they felt her integrity is compromised. Yes, it affected the election results and this was a very tight race but my opinion is that she did more to alienate, polarize, and mobilize her opponent party constituents by treating them like she was not going to represent them. Edit: The outcome of the election has nothing to do with the need to investigate Russia's actions."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,149 #520 May 25, 2017 DanG Quote Do you think that Russian interference should only be investigated or prosecuted if it actually had an effect? Hypothetically, how would that conversation go? "OK, we know you colluded with the Russian government to influence the election but since you would have won anyway we'll just let it go." ? Duh. Obviously attempted murder shouldn't be prosecuted either. It's only a crime if you're found guilty in a court of law. Fixed it for you. Worked for OJ. Works for the American Bar. Works for politicians. So must be good, just keep it secret and the public ignorant. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,489 #521 May 25, 2017 billvonIn any case, the larger issue is no longer the degree of collusion - it is the attempt to obstruct the investigation. Trump cheerleaders seem to be blind to the future, too. So we know Russia tried to meddle (and did meddle) with this election... so what about the next one? An investigation into what hapened in this election can help protect the integrity of the electoral process from foreign interference in the next election, and the one after, and the one after that. The President is trying to halt that investigation because it might make him look bad. But according to the Trumpeteers, that's just a meaningless procedural matter of no importance. Right.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #522 May 31, 2017 >And even more subpoenas - but this time for his businesses. (Businesses can't >plead the fifth.) Looks like that worked. Flynn has now agreed to hand over his emails and documents concerning his relationship with Russia. He is doing it as slowly as possible - perhaps he wants a few more days of freedom? - but he is doing it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #523 June 1, 2017 Regarding shark jumping http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/01/doj-blasts-report-sessions-may-have-met-privately-with-russian-official.html But then the media nose ring is tight will many of you. That said, I still have no opinion one way or another as I prefer to wait and see with comes out."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,991 #524 June 1, 2017 I am disappointed that you only used two Rush cliches and one FOX News link in your latest drive-by post. Where's the "fake news" claim? Where's the Clinton-did-it-first? Where's the Breitbart or white supremacist link to "prove" something? You're slipping. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #525 June 1, 2017 billvonI am disappointed that you only used two Rush cliches and one FOX News link in your latest drive-by post. Where's the "fake news" claim? Where's the Clinton-did-it-first? Where's the Breitbart or white supremacist link to "prove" something? You're slipping. You are getting more bitter the longer Trump is in office. Now, time to get off that shark Bill."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites